https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgansser(a)alice.de --- Comment #1 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; 2012-10-06 18:40:21 CEST --- a few notes: BuildRoot tag isn't required in the spec file http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag same with clean http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean also rm -rf %{buildroot} isn't necessary in the install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier(a)bachelot.org --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org&gt; 2012-10-11 15:21:52 CEST --- (In reply to comment #2) Just keep them in the spec, they will be ignored when not needed. Also, iirc, there is no difference between current fedora and rhel6 guidelines, only rhel5 needs special attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org(a)bfccomputing.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org | |(a)bfccomputing.com --- Comment #5 from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org(a)bfccomputing.com&gt; 2014-01-09 07:43:33 CET --- Greetings from 2014! SPEC: https://www.bfccomputing.com/downloads/fedora/fuse-mp3fs/fuse-mp3fs.spec SRPM: https://www.bfccomputing.com/downloads/fedora/fuse-mp3fs/fuse-mp3fs-0.32.... This wouldn't build for me on f19. Upstream seems to have addressed this by implementing the fixes in C++ in the source. I've updated the spec and source accordingly, and got a git commit archive from github to build inside the spec (there has been no numbered release of these fixes). I updated the name to fuse-mp3fs to match the current pattern with fuse filesystems in the fedora and rpmfusion repos. I'm currently testing this (listening to a Steve Miller FLAC via mp3fs over nfs at the moment) and it's working for me. I hit one snag where it would segfault in libmp3lame if the destination mountpoint was on a zfs volume (I don't even know if zfs or fuse support this). I moved it to an ext4 filesystem and it's working fine. I don't any way for that to be a build issue, but just for the sake of future searchers: [861607.664978] traps: mp3fs[24682] general protection ip:38c708040c sp:2b54514b08e8 error:0 [861607.671871] mp3fs[24683]: segfault at 2b496ee37c08 ip 00000038cf80ca18 sp 00002b54516cf800 error 6 [861607.727759] in libc-2.17.so[38c7000000+1b6000] [861607.785165] in libmp3lame.so.0.0.0[38cf800000+47000] Anyway, I was surprised this wasn't already in rpmfusion, so what else needs to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 --- Comment #7 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de&gt; 2014-01-09 11:09:01 CET --- please correct the version numbering in %changelog section and post the output from rpmlint again. rpmlint fuse-mp3fs-0.32.53-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm fuse-mp3fs.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.32-2 ['0.32.53-2.fc20', '0.32.53-2'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 --- Comment #9 from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org(a)bfccomputing.com&gt; 2014-01-10 13:43:34 CET --- (In reply to comment #7) SPECS]$ rpmlint fuse-mp3fs.spec ../SRPMS/fuse-mp3fs-0.32-2.fc19.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 --- Comment #11 from Stuart Gathman <stuart(a)gathman.org&gt; 2014-01-29 23:14:28 CET --- I submitted this package quite some time ago. Did I miss something? Was there a next step I was supposed to take? I don't believe I have priv to build on the official build system. If it is just a matter of waiting for people to get a round TUIT, I understand. I just want to make sure I'm not missing something in the procedure. I presume it would help if I submitted some packages to Fedora first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan(a)gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2014-01-30 11:27:17 CET --- (In reply to comment #11) I suggest you to submit packages in Fedora and start unofficial reviews of other packages there. This will help you to get sponsored faster. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Fedora sponsored packagers are automatically RPM Fusion sponsored packagers. Then, when you are sponsored, try to swap this review with another one - this usually works :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.