On 11/22/2011 05:20 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
On 21.11.2011 22:37, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 06:16 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
>> Le 21/11/2011 17:15, Xavier Bachelot a écrit :
>>> After many years, there's a new release of libdvdcss. This raises the
>>> question of who does maintain this package these days. I've asked ANvil
>>> from
livna.org, but it was not clear even to him, so I thought asking
>>> here might bring some light. This might be a bit off topic, but Livna
>>> instructs to mail rpmfusion-devel anyway.
>> Check the remi repository ;)
> Yes, indeed, I've been pointed at your repo for libdvdcss already. But
> your repo provides much more than libdvdcss and most of the other stuff
> it provides is overlaping with other Fedora reporitories. Don't get me
> wrong, I know for sure you're doing a great work. My point is just that
> it's less convenient than repositories that stack up properly like
> Fedora + RPM Fusion + Livna.
+1
> I'm not looking at replacing the Livna repo
> with something else, I just want to make sure there is someone to
> maintain libdvdcss in Livna (or another place with a non-replacement
> policy). If there's no maintainer currently, I'll discuss further with
> Anvil on the way forward and I'm willing to step up to be the maintainer
> if needed. Maybe you'll want to step up too :-)
I'm wondering if those involved and most active in RPM Fusion these days
should first discuss if shipping libdvdcss in RPM Fusion might be the
better solution...
The idea of suggesting to move libdvdcss into RPM Fusion crossed my
mind, but I re-read the archived threads and refrained from doing so, at
least for now. I'm genuinely interest in finding out who is the current
maintainer and who can sign packages for Livna. But now you made the
suggestion, let's discuss that too :-)
Regards,
Xavier