[Bug 1653] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
4:50 p.m.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart -
RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart
package manager
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fduraibi(a)fadvisor.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
http://fadvisor.net/files/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart.spec
http://fadvisor.net/files/rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-14-0.1.src.rpm
This package provides the configuration files required by the Smart package
manager to use RPM Fusion's "free" software repository.
rpmlint output SPEC:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint output SRC.RPM:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
This is my first RPM Fusion package and I am seeking a sponsor.
This package is based on the original package
"rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart-11-0.4.src.rpm" found in RPM Fusion which
I updated to work with Fedora 14
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1653] Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
Fahad Alduraibi <fduraibi(a)fadvisor.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |1654
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1653] Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtimms(a)iinet.net.au
--- Comment #1 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2011-03-14 07:06:11 ---
Hi Fahad: We only need one package in the rpmfusion repo for multiple fedora
releases. My initial thought is that if the current version available in the
repository does not work, then you should create a bug for that issue, and add
a patch to that bug that resolves the issues you are presenting here.
Does that make sense, or am I missing something ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1653] Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
--- Comment #2 from Fahad Alduraibi <fduraibi(a)fadvisor.net> 2011-03-14 18:41:19
---
Hi David,
I do agree on how it should be done, but on how the current package (F11)
works, it reads the version from the package itself. So if we update the old
one from 11 to 14 then it will work for F14 users only but F12 and F13 will not
have the correct repos.
So should we have a single package that gets the version from a place like
"/etc/fedora-release" , or have multiple packages for every supported Fedora
release bu RPM Fusion (currently F12, 13 and 14)?
The same issue applies to the architecture (i386 vs x86_64). Since currently it
is applied during the package build time so we need a package for each arch,
while it can be set during the installation time where the package will read
the system arch and use it to set the correct URL.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1653] Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
--- Comment #3 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2011-03-14 21:45:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I do agree on how it should be done, but on how the current package
(F11)
works, it reads the version from the package itself. So if we update the old
To me,
it looks like it sed fixes the smart config files during the build
process, and hence does what we need. Again getting the initial packager onside
by creating a bug report is the best bet.
Open a bug against the package and express the problem there, then close this
one for now (leaving refers bug id).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:40 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1653] Review request: rpmfusion-free-package-config-smart - RPM Fusion (free) configuration files for the Smart package manager
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653
Fahad Alduraibi <fduraibi(a)fadvisor.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|2, 30 |
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Fahad Alduraibi <fduraibi(a)fadvisor.net> 2011-03-15 04:40:33
---
You are right, the sed will get the version but during build time, so the final
package will only work for the version that it was set to. So we will end up
with a package that will work with one Fedora release only.
I feel the sed should be done during "%post" and get the version of the target
machine not the build machine.
And there was a bug report to update 11 to 12 but until now it is still at 11
and there is not 12, 13 or 14.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1008 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4801
days inactive
4807
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
5 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla