8:26 p.m.
I finally imported "sidplay-libs" to RPMFusion, but I'm unable to create
the dir for "sidplay" now, must be that the process was turned manual.
Since this is a legacy package from Dribble, can som kind soul create this
for me and set up the proper ACL?
Linus Walleij
7:09 p.m.
On 11.11.2008 21:26, Linus Walleij wrote:
I finally imported "sidplay-libs" to RPMFusion,
thx!
but I'm unable to create
the dir for "sidplay" now, must be that the process was turned manual.
Package and branch creation always was manual in Fedora and RPM Fusion.
Since this is a legacy package from Dribble, can som kind soul create
this
for me and set up the proper ACL?
I created everything; but note, normally you should have filled a CVS
request in bugzilla (similar to how it's done in Fedora; we just use bug
#33 as blocker instead of a flag)
CU
knurd
10:24 p.m.
ons 2008-11-12 klockan 20:09 +0100 skrev Thorsten Leemhuis:
Package and branch creation always was manual in Fedora and RPM
Fusion.
Hm, fun, then "sidplay-libs" must have existed in nonfree already for
some reason whereas "sidplay" didn't. Well, there is an SRPM for the
former in Dribble and not for the latter so I believe that has something
to do with it...
normally you should have filled a CVS
request in bugzilla (similar to how it's done in Fedora; we just use bug
#33 as blocker instead of a flag)
Yeah I got it backwards, since it was described as part of the review
bug and since this wasn't a review, since it was old, etc. I will not do
this a lot so hope it doesn't disturb the workflow too much...
Linus
3:16 p.m.
On 12.11.2008 23:24, Linus Walleij wrote:
ons 2008-11-12 klockan 20:09 +0100 skrev Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Package and branch creation always was manual in Fedora and RPM Fusion.
Hm, fun, then "sidplay-libs" must have existed in nonfree already for
some reason
A lot of (all?) dribble packages was mass-branched by Xavier.
whereas "sidplay" didn't. Well, there is an SRPM for
the
former in Dribble and not for the latter so I believe that has something
to do with it...
Then the package normally should have been reviewed. But it is listed on
http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms9.html (I checked that before creating
the branch).
> normally you should have filled a CVS
> request in bugzilla (similar to how it's done in Fedora; we just use bug
> #33 as blocker instead of a flag)
Yeah I got it backwards, since it was described as part of the review
bug and since this wasn't a review, since it was old, etc.
Just like in Fedora we open bugs for CVS requests, even if the review is
old (and was done in other bugzillas like fedora.us)
I will not do
this a lot so hope it doesn't disturb the workflow too much...
np
But you (or the import script) did something else wrong: You added a
compressed patch to CVS:
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-commits/2008-November/0026...
CVS doesn't handle compressed files very well, hence we avoid to do it.
Can you please upload that patch to CVS with "make upload
FILES='sidplay_2.0.9-5.diff.gz'"? tia!
CU
knurd
3:25 p.m.
New subject: CVS mangle patches
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
But you (or the import script) did something else wrong: You added a
compressed patch to CVS:
Yeah, was going to mail about that. The reason to do this was that I first
added the (large) uncompressed patch, and it was mangled by CVS! The patch
no longe applied after being submitted... I never experienced anything
like this before. Has anyone else seen this behaviour?
CVS doesn't handle compressed files very well, hence we avoid to
do it. Can
you please upload that patch to CVS with "make upload
FILES='sidplay_2.0.9-5.diff.gz'"? tia!
Yeah I will fix it that way instead.
Linus
7:56 p.m.
tor 2008-11-13 klockan 16:16 +0100 skrev Thorsten Leemhuis:
Then the package normally should have been reviewed. But it is listed
on
http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms9.html (I checked that before creating
the branch).
It was reviewed and built for Dribble but there was something else that
made it never end up in the SRPM stash.
Review from Dribble is here:
http://dribble.org.uk/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123
Linus
5636
days inactive
5638
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Linus Walleij -
Thorsten Leemhuis