Summary: Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for
Product: Package Reviews
Component: Review Request
Estimated Hours: 0.0
A C crosscompiler for 6502 systems, including a macroassembler that
supports 6502, 65SC02 and 65816 CPUs, a linker, an archiver and some
other tools. To create programs for one of the supported target
machines, you have to install at least one of the target platform
packages in addition to the main package.
Not eligible for Fedora, as it is a "non-free" package. Received permission
from its author, Ullrich von Bassewitz, to act as a package maintainer and
request submission to RPM Fusion.
License: Freeware with exceptions - see docs
$ rpmlint SPECS/cc65.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/cc65-2.13.2-1.src.rpm
cc65.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Crosscompiler -> Cross compiler,
cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crosscompiler -> cross
compiler, cross-compiler, crosscutting
cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US macroassembler -> macro
assembler, macro-assembler, assembler
cc65.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US archiver -> archive,
cc65.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
cc65.src: W: invalid-license Freeware with exceptions - see docs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
With the exception of the invalid-license warning, I see no issue. Please
advise what this non-free packaging license may conform to, thank you, as this
is my FIRST package submission.
I am seeking to become an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. If this 8-bit
compiler suite is adopted, it will allow other homebrewed 8-bit software to be
packaged to run with VICE and other emulators found in RPM Fusion repository.
But this package would be the first, necessary step for dependency issues.
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.