http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at&gt; 2009-06-23 19:25:14 --- Why the heck is speex (and speexrate) in -freeworld? And what are those *dsp* modules? Do they depend on ffmpeg or something? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-24 16:14:39 --- (In reply to comment #2) the maemo plateform target an arm processor. This plugin is only usefull to control the dsp on such plateform. There is no dependency expect from dbus. from the fedora alsa-plugin, we could have : %ifarch arm --enable-maemo-plugin \ --enable-maemo-resource-manager \ %else --disable-maemo-plugin \ %endif (For some reason this has to be explicitly disabled or enabled - and then have the related -maemo sub-package done) There is a maemo sub-package that can be found for some distro on ix86 and x86_64. But I expect it will be usefull only for development purpose. (And I'm not even sure). If speex was in livna at the time of the alsa-plugin review, this is not the case anymore. You can enable it from the fedora package (then I will disable it). The current shape, only the a52 and lavcrate plugin are provided (in other word, only needs the libavcodec dependency since a52 from libavcodec extends feature wise the previous a52dec implementation.) I would like to keep the freeworld keyword, and stay monolithic unless other dependencies are added... I'm not a I don't think ldconfig should be run on library meant to be dlopened from a path not added to the linker (_libdir/alsa-lib ). If it is required, then ldconfig need to be run on %post and %postun for each sub-package as : %post subpackage -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun subpackage -p /sbin/ldconfig But I'm very confident that this is not required at all. (at least grep libasound_module /etc/ld.so.cache doesn't seems to output anything). yes, the lib option isn't related to the library path on lib64. It stands for system library over "no" speex usage or "builtin" speex library (understand statically linked). (Furthermore, x86_64 is my primary testing platform, so yes it works). But I will not enable speex from there since it should go to fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #5 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-25 01:21:51 --- [snip] Why would we want a package specific to the maemo platform knowing that the distro itself does not officialy support the platform? If you think I missed it, could you point me to the Fedora maemo support page? I am not suggesting the freeworld keyword should go but rather that using subpackages would be consistent with other alsa-plugins subpackages. Splitting the package has the additional benefit of not bloating the streamlined setup of an embedded device. I would prefer to see 2 packages, one containing the a52 plugin: alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and the other having the lavcrate: alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate even if they both depend on libavcodec. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #7 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-25 20:41:15 --- If you simply re-use the alsa-plugins subpackage structure you should end up with a source package called alsa-plugins-freeworld and upon building, two binary packages alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #9 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-29 19:43:11 --- Yes, I will add a speex plugin to the Fedora package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #11 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-07-03 01:27:50 --- * %dir is missing from %file lavcrate subpackage. Without it and installing only lavcrate _sysconfdir/alsa/pcm would be orphaned * You should only leave LGPLv2+ in the License tag, neither a52 or lavcrate are under GPLv2+ * You could add some spaces to correctly indent the Provides: alsa-plugins-lavcrate tag * If it was my package I would list ffmpeg-devel as a dependency for both a52 and lavcrate even though it may seem to be a duplication :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #13 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-07-15 12:48:06 --- ping ? Is there a reviewer actually ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |33 --- Comment #16 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-08-20 15:34:32 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: alsa-plugins-freeworld Short Description: The ALSA Plugins - freeworld version Owners: kwizart(a)gmail.com Branches: devel F-11 F-10 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.