Hi All, I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the plans here ?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello, > > On Seg, 2015-10-12 at 08:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23: > > > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 > > > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the > > plans here ? > > Hi, > > Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user > glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied : > "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week > so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates. > Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too > little on new infra tasks" > I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again. > And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo > is published in directory development/23/ ! > > I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will > be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest > priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? > > About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers > like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next > piece that we should integrated ? I don't think packages should have the priority. At least not until it receives the work that we are planning on doing on it and while useful for user it does not have an influence on the other tools (bothi2, pkgdb2).

> Other questions : > > - x264 is missing in Fedora 23 devel repo [2] , what happened ? Failed > to build on ARM ? I want enable with-asm option (only > F21 ) I could try and help, but since I have no access to the "new" infra, I can't test-build anything for F22+ on ARM.

I'd like to update FFmpeg to 2.8.x and MPlayer to 1.2, too.

Lot of work done and still no help. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023

Hello mates On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com&gt;: > Hi All, > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x > for Fedora-23: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What > are the > plans here ? > Sorry for the lake for answear, > > > The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time > after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. > > development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, > updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages > (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) > > > Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 > later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from > end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) > As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd like try do it in oneshot ... Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 yesterday for F23 . I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump .

2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>>: Hi, On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hello mates On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>>: Hi All, I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the plans here ? Sorry for the lake for answear, The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd like try do it in oneshot ... Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 yesterday for F23 . I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg. We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent version fit. Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 08:14 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >> 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede >> <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>>: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> Hello mates >> >> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede >> <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>>: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer >> packages to 1.6.x >> for Fedora-23: >> >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 >> >> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 >> yet. What >> are the >> plans here ? >> Sorry for the lake for answear, >> >> >> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some >> time >> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. >> >> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the >> f23 key, >> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages >> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) >> >> >> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into >> releases/23 >> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from >> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) >> >> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with >> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! >> and I'd >> like try do it in oneshot ... >> >> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 >> yesterday for F23 . >> >> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had >> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a >> copy!) , >> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some >> coordination >> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik >> suggest >> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname >> bump . >> >> >> Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would >> be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for >> F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite >> its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg. >> >> >> We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not >> completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent >> version fit. >> Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing. >> >> Thx >> >> >> -- >> - >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) > Hi, > > I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw, > should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net? Hello, Thanks for taking care of mplayer. What are the developments ? - https://github.com/rpmfusion have a mirror of all sources , at least people could know the state of updates and build in on others arches - if spectool -g foo.spec doesn't download the sources , we should upload sources to old infra with old make new-sources FILES="foo" - and, please, do not forget update the sources file on git (md5sum foo.tar.bz2 > sources) BTW what is the state of gstreamer (packages to 1.6.x ) for F23 ? you need help?

Hello mates On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com&gt;: > Hi All, > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x > for Fedora-23: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What > are the > plans here ? > Sorry for the lake for answear, > > > The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time > after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. > > development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, > updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages > (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) > > > Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 > later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from > end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) > As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd like try do it in oneshot ... Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 yesterday for F23 . I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . [1] http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists [2] https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419... > >

2015-10-25 21:12 GMT+01:00 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt;:

> I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted > already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is > not completely populated yet. > xvidcore and x265 are failing.