https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-08-20 12:39:52 CEST --- Thanks for inspecting BRs. I'll look at that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-08-27 22:19:03 CEST --- 404 while trying to download your latest package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-08-28 06:57:21 CEST --- Ok, it looks fine except one small issue (should be fixed before final submission) - BuildRequires: libvdpau-devel is listed twice. Here is my REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is almost silent (these messages are harmless) Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/mpv-0.1.2-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/mpv-0.1.2-2.fc19.src.rpm mpv.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecs -> codes, coders, code's mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codecs -> codes, coders, code's mpv.src:42: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv3 or later, see https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/commit/1752808 ) + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum v0.1.2.tar.gz* 9d9d680670308102453c8498580b284d66b673f8f0435254ee131e72d93096c3 v0.1.2.tar.gz 9d9d680670308102453c8498580b284d66b673f8f0435254ee131e72d93096c3 v0.1.2.tar.gz.1 sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (my x86_64 box). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. 0 The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No C/C++ header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files without a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so) in some of the dynamic linker's default paths. 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 A console application, no need to install *.desktop file. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-08-28 13:36:49 CEST --- Thanks Peter. I'll remove the duplicity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-08-31 12:49:08 CEST --- That's RPMFusion, a place with ancient buildings abandoned long time ago. So please be patient - it could take a very long time. In the meantime you can use RFRemix koji to play with more modern and reliable build system (it's prohibited to use Fedora koji for building patent-encumbered software). Just drop me (or Alexandra "Bookwar") a line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-09-08 15:01:57 CEST --- Miro, how's is going? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-09-09 13:39:43 CEST --- (In reply to comment #12) There is a need to rebuild the packages that was hitten by the buildsys issue, mainly during F-20. there are no broken packages out of the infra, so you might be able to reproduce using mock. libswresample might only be enabled recently in our ffmpeg package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel(a)seyman.fr&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel(a)seyman.fr --- Comment #15 from Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel(a)seyman.fr&gt; 2013-09-09 13:46:46 CEST --- I believe you'll find libswresample in the ffmpeg-libs package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-09-09 18:11:28 CEST --- In mock, F19 and devel builds fine. In F18, I get this: Checking for libavresample >= 1.0.0 ... no Checking for libswresample >= 0.17.102 ... no Error: No resampler found. Install libavresample or libswresample (FFmpeg). However, it fails in buildsys to all of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #19 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-09-09 22:58:51 CEST --- OK, so I won't target F18. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #21 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-09-15 01:17:55 CEST --- Builds are failing in buildsys, working in mock. Have no idea how to solve that, logs are incomplete or missing. When logs are somehow available, it seems weird stuff is in buildroot, e.g.: DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: ffmpeg-devel-2.0.1-1.fc20.i686 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: ffmpeg-libs(x86-32) = 2.0.1-1.fc20 DEBUG util.py:264: Available: ffmpeg-libs-2.0.1-1.fc20.i686 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide) DEBUG util.py:264: ffmpeg-libs(x86-32) = 2.0.1-1.fc20 DEBUG util.py:264: Installing: ffmpeg-libs-2.0.1-2.fc20.i686 (rpmfusion-free-needsign-rawhide) DEBUG util.py:264: ffmpeg-libs(x86-32) = 2.0.1-2.fc20 DEBUG util.py:264: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-09-15 06:23:36 CEST --- Btw ver. 0.1.6 is out https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/releases/tag/v0.1.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #25 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-09-15 16:12:30 CEST --- It never happened to me in Fedora, that I was unable to build a package for weeks due to buildroot errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #27 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-09-20 10:11:48 CEST --- Folks, I think we should seriously reconsider replacing RPMFusion with something better. I propose * Switching to Git * GitHub integration * Koji instead of plague * Redmine instead of Bugzilla Actually we already have such a platform (in a fully working state, completely separated from main Fedora) but we don't mind if someone proposes his own solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu&gt; 2013-09-20 14:24:46 CEST --- Yes, please, bugs are not the place for discussion of this nature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #31 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-10-12 13:05:02 CEST --- Looks like we should close this ticket since the package is now in updates. Miro, please start updating it up to currently released 0.1.7: * https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/releases Also I think it would be great to build it with wayland support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 --- Comment #32 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com&gt; 2013-10-12 13:38:15 CEST --- That would be great, but I failed at that point. Have no idea how to make it work. Even if I install every relevant wayland package and try to --enable-wayland, it doesn't help at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.