Hans de Goede wrote :
Richi Plana wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as both
>> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel
>> package which should be removed.
> Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate
> package? And is this an rpmfusion policy?
No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a
rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora
And libdvdcss is dlopen()ed from everywhere anyway, right?
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 220.127.116.11-10.fc7
Load : 0.08 0.06 0.11