Re: retiring sdlmame-data-foo packages

2010/9/30 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt;: > Dear all, > > recently a request was filed to rename this packages to mame-data-foo > [1], which has prompted me to ask myself the question: do these packages > make any sense? > In my opinion, they violate two of the packaging guidelines: code vs > content and shipping multiple upstreams in one package. I think that > sdlmame-data itself makes some sense since it enriches the experience > with frontends, but others are pointless imo. Having said that, I just > issued what I think will be a final update to sdlmame-data samples. > Also, co-maintainers for the main sdlmame-data package are welcome. > > Julian > > [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426 > > Maybe you can also retire sdlmess-data* packages as well :) Chen Lei