--- Comment #22 from Mikhail Kalenkov <Mikhail.Kalenkov(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-18
(In reply to comment #21)
SPEC - http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid.spec
SRPM - http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid-3.7.3-7.fc11.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #18)
> I wrote two patches scid-makefile-togaII.patch and
> scid-makefile-phalanx.patch. Actually I don't like the way I fix optflags
> issues. Could you recommend a better way?
I think this is the best we could do. You could ask upstream why they are not
honoring the flags defined by OPTIMIZE variable for the compilation of these
> Is it necessary to specify license tag for subpackages?
Actually, this is a good question and something that I missed during the
review. The license tag is inherited from the parent package. You only have to
define the license tag in a subpackage if it is different from the parent's.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong: In this case,
- the main package is "GPLv2+ and distributable only in Scid"
- sounds and bases packages are "GPLv2+"
- books package is "GPL+ and freely distributable"
Done. I found that
src/tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/* files have a nonGPL license
(tcl/contrib/ezsmtp/license.txt). I wrote in spec file that they are "freely
distributable". Is it correct?
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.