Re: new rpmfusion-packager and rfpkg srpm broken
2016-09-13 10:47 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
On Ter, 2016-09-13 at 10:29 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-09-13 10:11 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I start building rpmfusion-packager-0.5.1 , with rpmfusion-koji
> > command
> > packaged , meantime new rfpkg fails to build srpm
> nitpick, but why rpmfusion-koji, i'm using koji-rpmfusion everywhere,
> but some started documenting rpmfusion-koji
> It's minor issue, I don't mind anyway.
because we have /etc/koji/rpmfusion-config , arm-config
and /usr/bin/arm-koji so need to be rpmfusion-koji , to not change
the script (arch=`basename $0 | cut -d '-' -f 1`)
Okay, but rpmfusion is not an arch. When we will need a arm/ppc
secondary, we will use arm-koji-rpmfusion and ppc-koji-rpmfusion.
Also look at the koji web URL, you start typing koji, then fedora or
rpmfusion. So here rpmfusion is a suffix not a prefix.
Please change the script, since the other is confusing, we just need
to use koji -c /etc/koji/rpmfusion-config (But I have a pending
question about this on #koji ...)
> > rfpkg srpm
> > error: line 85: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 7.fc26-
> > ree
> Seems self explaining, where does in -ree comes from ?
> do you have a custom dist macro in your rpm environment ?
after
dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-updates-testing distro-sync rfpkg
(with rfpkg-1.24.0-1.fc23.noarch) works again , seems rfpkg-1.25.0-
1.fc23.noarch fault .
Ok, thx for testing into that.
Please report in our bugzilla
> > next step for rpmfusion-packager is add rpmfuison_cert as
fedora-
> > packager have fedora_cert sub-package.
> Please don't, not needed for us.
fedora_cert is your client cert, we may check client is valid , say
when expires and we can renew it, at least should be useful, but I
don't want do anything with talk with you .
yes, but it is written as python
module whereas we would only need to
change a single parameter.
It's a sub-package because it might be used by others cli apps with
python "import fedora_cert"
If we start forking this python module, then it will mean we need to
fork every others cli apps I and would like to avoid that.
That been said if you want to rebase the current code from fedora-cert
and fedora-packager-setup for rpmfusion-packager it's a good idea.
There is just no need to have a rpmfusion-cert sub-package at this time.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)