On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
Because this "transarc style" doesn't comply to the FHS.
I think FHS is a good thing to have. Several packages have exceptions,
$ rpm -ql krb5-workstation
Jack's simply proposing that this optional openafs-compat package
provide symlinks in the non-FHS locations. The main packages' binaries
would still follow the FHS.