RPMfusion governance (Was: Kodi)
On 22/06/16 23:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Can you please explain a little more your point of view ? and what
did
you expect ?
Basically, two things. The first is some decency - this does not
include being called an idiot on the list by you.
The second is some transparency in how this repo is run. The docs still
describes a steering committee and packages being approved by reviewers
(and that's basically it). But in the end you overturn any decision you
feel that you need to (and the committee doesn't exist).
Which is perfectly fine, it's your show. But ít should really be
communicated so that contributors knows the rules.
RPMfusion is an important repo, and I wish you luck. And hopefully new
contributors.
Cheers!
-alec