Re: [Bug 1958] New: Review request: gmtk - Library of common functions and widgets for gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958 Summary: Review request: gmtk - Library of common functions and widgets for gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: belegdol(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk-1.0.5b1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Library of common functions and widgets for gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer Why not in fedora: It requires mplayer rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/*.rpm gmtk.spec gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://code.google.com/p/gmtk/files/gmtk-1.0.5b1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gmtk.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://code.google.com/p/gmtk/files/gmtk-1.0.5b1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. 404 is because the tarball is made by me in order to start the review before 1.0.5 is out. This way the delay for updating gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer will be shorter. There is one problem: the COPYING file contains GPLv3 while the files seem to be GPLv2+. I'll clarify that with upstream.