7:54 p.m.
Dear all,
ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and
the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
rpmsodiff output is attached.
Best regards,
Julian
8:16 p.m.
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>
Dear all,
ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and
the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
rpmsodiff output is attached.
devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass rawhide
usability
tests before anything else.
As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if any.
I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a later
point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc because they
will build but the rework needed to make it run will be done in the next
vlc, not vlc bugfix.
Nicolas (kwizart)
Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
9:02 p.m.
W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
<belegdol(a)gmail.com
<mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
Dear all,
ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and
the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
rpmsodiff output is attached.
devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass rawhide
usability tests before anything else.
As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if any.
I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
Nicolas (kwizart)
Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed.
More details can be seen here:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/ffmpeg.html
vlc builds indeed, I can look into setting up a test environment to
check whether it runs. In any case, f20 is eons away so there will be
plenty of time to fix this.
When it comes to mplayer, each branch contains the latest mplayer that
will build together with ffmpeg shipped on said branch. ffmpeg-1.2
allows building today's snapshot, so the update limit has not been
reached yet.
Julian
9:30 p.m.
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>
W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> <belegdol(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
>
> Dear all,
>
> ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds
and
> the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
> dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
> I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe
even
> to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
> rpmsodiff output is attached.
>
> devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass rawhide
> usability tests before anything else.
> As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if
any.
>
> I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
> later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
> because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
> done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
>
>
>
>
As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed.
More details can be seen here:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/ffmpeg.html
what is the answear ? (I've no time to check)
vlc builds indeed, I can look into setting up a test environment to
check whether it runs. In any case, f20 is eons away so there will be
plenty of time to fix this.
I prefer that you spend time on doing reviews than loosing it on testing
vlc-2.0.5 at runtime whereas latest bugfix as everything already commented
out.
That been said, the version that vlc tried to avoid was with
libavcodec.so.55 (so not yet).
When it comes to mplayer, each branch contains the latest mplayer that
will build together with ffmpeg shipped on said branch. ffmpeg-1.2
allows building today's snapshot, so the update limit has not been
reached yet.
good,
so, but my comment still hold, get it settle on f20, then we will see if we
have it on f19 before GA.
Nicolas (kwizart)
10:53 p.m.
2013/3/18 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com>
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>
> W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> > <belegdol(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep
> rebuilds and
> > the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
> > dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
> > I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe
> even
> > to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
> > rpmsodiff output is attached.
> >
> > devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass rawhide
> > usability tests before anything else.
> > As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if
> any.
> >
> > I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
> > later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
> > because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
> > done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> >
> > Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed.
>
I should apologize, I've miss to see the rpmdiff output was attached in
the
first message.
So the rpmsodiff looks more safe than I expected.
There is a need to know the reason from this symbol removal, but this
should be better to expect to F-19 soon, indeed.
That been said, there are still pending FTBFS from the F-19 mass rebuild,
and some of theses are related to ffmpeg API. So unless there is a newer
version compatible with current ffmpeg, it would like them to be moved to
ffmpeg-compat (motion failed to catch it despite my attempt).
Nicolas (kwizart)
6:59 a.m.
W dniu 20.03.2013 23:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2013/3/18 Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com
<mailto:kwizart@gmail.com>>
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
<belegdol(a)gmail.com
<mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> <belegdol(a)gmail.com
<mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com
<mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>>
>
> Dear all,
>
> ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of
dep rebuilds and
> the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino,
lightspark and
> dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg
though.
> I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and
then maybe even
> to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
> rpmsodiff output is attached.
>
> devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must
pass rawhide
> usability tests before anything else.
> As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes
involved if any.
>
> I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in
branched/F-19 at a
> later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked
by vlc
> because they will build but the rework needed to make it run
will be
> done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
> Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
>
>
>
>
As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was
removed.
I should apologize, I've miss to see the rpmdiff output was attached in
the first message.
So the rpmsodiff looks more safe than I expected.
There is a need to know the reason from this symbol removal, but this
should be better to expect to F-19 soon, indeed.
That been said, there are still pending FTBFS from the F-19 mass
rebuild, and some of theses are related to ffmpeg API. So unless there
is a newer version compatible with current ffmpeg, it would like them to
be moved to ffmpeg-compat (motion failed to catch it despite my attempt).
Nicolas (kwizart)
Hardware acceleration was overhauled so this might be the reason
for
symbol removal.
I have now committed the updated spec so that maintainers can look into
fixing their packages, I'll submit a build in several days.
Best regards,
Julian
12:09 a.m.
On Sáb, 2013-03-23 at 07:59 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 20.03.2013 23:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2013/3/18 Nicolas Chauvet
> <kwizart(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:kwizart@gmail.com>>
>
> 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> <belegdol(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>
>
> W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski
> > <belegdol(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com
> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>>
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of
> dep rebuilds and
> > the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino,
> lightspark and
> > dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg
> though.
> > I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and
> then maybe even
> > to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
> > rpmsodiff output is attached.
> >
> > devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must
> pass rawhide
> > usability tests before anything else.
> > As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes
> involved if any.
> >
> > I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in
> branched/F-19 at a
> > later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked
> by vlc
> > because they will build but the rework needed to make it run
> will be
> > done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
> >
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> >
> > Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was
> removed.
>
> I should apologize, I've miss to see the rpmdiff output was attached in
> the first message.
> So the rpmsodiff looks more safe than I expected.
> There is a need to know the reason from this symbol removal, but this
> should be better to expect to F-19 soon, indeed.
>
> That been said, there are still pending FTBFS from the F-19 mass
> rebuild, and some of theses are related to ffmpeg API. So unless there
> is a newer version compatible with current ffmpeg, it would like them to
> be moved to ffmpeg-compat (motion failed to catch it despite my attempt).
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
Hardware acceleration was overhauled so this might be the reason for
symbol removal.
I have now committed the updated spec so that maintainers can look into
fixing their packages, I'll submit a build in several days.
Hi,
I finally have a F19 virtual machine to test things.
On F19, kmediafactory and k3b-extras-freeworld still not fixed for
ffmpeg-1.1.4 ?
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
12:37 a.m.
On Seg, 2013-03-18 at 21:16 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
--
Sérgio M. B.
2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>
Dear all,
ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep
rebuilds and
the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark
and
dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg
though.
I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then
maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
rpmsodiff output is attached.
devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass
rawhide usability tests before anything else.
As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if
any.
I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a
later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc
because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be
done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix.
Nicolas (kwizart)
Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently
Hi,
I think we should begin mass rebuild dependencies of ffmpeg / x264 /
mplayer on rawhide . After we check that almost everything compiles and
run. we should pass it to F19 , I'm giving up have it on F18.
Reindl Harald said ffmpeg-1.3 is on the way.
So after merge it to F19, we have another round on rawhide for
ffmpeg-1.3 and I hope in time to merge again on F19 , before F19
Release.
IMHO
repoquery --releasever=rawhide list --disablerepo=\*updates\* -q mplayer
ffmpeg --nvr
ffmpeg-1.1.3-1.fc19
mplayer-1.1-5.20130123svn.fc19
9:25 p.m.
On Seg, 2013-03-18 at 20:54 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
and then maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule
Fedora 19 Final Release will be, at best, 2013-06-25
So for me 3 months is a long time and I agree and support push all
ffmpeg / x264 from F19 to F18.
But I think we should have some QA in F19 before push it therefore I'm
trying setup a vm with F19 which is not easy , because compose images of
F19 are stopped due a bugs in pungi, lorax , fedup etc.
So until we have a F19 alfa install iso . I can't test it on a F19 , and
don't have any rawhide .
--
Sérgio M. B.
3:13 a.m.
On Seg, 2013-03-18 at 20:54 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear all,
ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and
the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and
dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though.
I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even
to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered.
rpmsodiff output is attached.
Hi, I saw that you build ffmpeg and mplayer on rawhide .
repoquery --nvr --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo=\*updates\* -q ffmpeg
\*-1.2 mplayer\* --whatrequires --alldeps --source | grep -vP "^mplayer|
^ffmpeg.*-1.2|^mencoder" | grep src.rpm | sort -u
we should rebuild this 48 packages:
acoustid-fingerprinter-0.6-1.fc19.src.rpm
alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.0.26-2.fc19.src.rpm
audacious-plugins-freeworld-3.3.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
bino-1.4.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
bombono-dvd-1.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
chromaprint-tools-0.7-3.fc19.src.rpm
cmus-2.5.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
devede-3.23.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
dvbcut-0.6.1-8.svn179.fc19.src.rpm
dvd95-1.6p0-5.fc19.src.rpm
DVDRipOMatic-0.95-9.fc19.src.rpm
dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
dvdstyler-2.4.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
ffmpeg2theora-0.29-3.fc19.src.rpm
ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.8-3.fc19.src.rpm
ffmpegthumbs-4.9.97-1.fc19.src.rpm
get_iplayer-2.80-6.fc19.src.rpm
gmtk-1.0.8-1.fc19.src.rpm
gpac-0.5.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
guvcview-1.6.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
imagination-3.0-9.fc19.src.rpm
k3b-extras-freeworld-2.0.2-9.fc19.src.rpm
k9copy-2.3.8-2.fc17.src.rpm
kdenlive-0.9.4-2.fc19.src.rpm
kmediafactory-0.8.1-5.fc19.src.rpm
kplayer-0.7.0-8.20081211cvs.fc19.src.rpm
libquicktime-1.2.4-5.fc19.src.rpm
lightspark-0.7.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
minidlna-1.0.25-4.fc19.src.rpm
miro-5.0.4-3.fc19.src.rpm
mjpegtools-2.0.0-6.fc19.src.rpm
mlt-0.8.8-2.fc19.src.rpm
mpd-0.17.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
mythtv-0.26.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
nailer-0.4.6-1.fc19.src.rpm
ogmrip-1.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
picard-freeworld-1.1-2.fc19.src.rpm
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.6.6-2.fc19.src.rpm
smplayer-0.8.4-2.fc20.src.rpm
vdr-mp3-0.10.2-6.fc19.src.rpm
vdrsync-0.1.3-16.PRE1.050322.fc19.src.rpm
vlc-2.0.5-6.fc20.src.rpm
wxsvg-1.1.13-1.fc19.src.rpm
x264-0.129-3.20130305gite403db4.fc19.src.rpm
xbmc-12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.21-5.fc19.src.rpm
xmms2-freeworld-0.8-7.fc19.src.rpm
xmms-mplayer-0.5-4.fc19.src.rpm
--
Sérgio M. B.
4045
days inactive
4063
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
9 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Julian Sikorski -
Nicolas Chauvet -
Sérgio Basto