January 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

Re: s/nonfree/freeworld/ in package name postfix?!

by Aurelien Bompard

> Why don't you name it to a name actually saying what it means: > *-nonus There are other places where software patents are legal, eg Japan IIRC. Aurélien -- http://aurelien.bompard.org ~~~~ Jabber : abompard(a)jabber.fr This mail is displayed with recycled electrons

16 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

s/nonfree/freeworld/ in package name postfix?!

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi all! FYI: there was a new package reviewed for Livna which contains bits that are not acceptable for Fedora. During review it had the name-postifx "-nonfree". Several people never liked the term, as the bits in this and similar cases are actually free, just not acceptable for Fedora due to US laws. So there was a discussion to chose a different name. We quick settled on the term "freeworld". If that name is okay for everybody else I'd suggest we use it from now on and change all other "nonfree OSS" packages (audacious-plugins-nonfree, xine-lib-extras-nonfree, kde-multimedia-nonfree, ...) to that name before or during the move to RPM Fusion. Does that sound like a plan? For details see: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1631 Cu knurd

16 years, 11 months

5
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3] Tracker: Packages under review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|18 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |18 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 18] New: Review request: autopano-sift-C - SIFT feature detection

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Summary: Review request: autopano-sift-C - SIFT feature detection Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: bruno(a)postle.net Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/autopano-sift-C.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/8/x86_64/SRPMS.pa... Description: This package provides an implementation of the SIFT algorithm and a set of utilities to utilize the algorithm to match two or more images. The output is created as project file for the hugin panorama stitching software. Note0: This is an SVN snapshot as there have been no tarball releases. Note1: This isn't in fedora because SIFT is patented in the US. Note2: This is a C port of 'autopano-sift' (which is a mono app). Note3: autopano-sift is on the rpmfusion wishlist. Note4: builds in mock for x86_64 and i386. Note5: rpmlint reports no errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|18 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3] Tracker: Packages under review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |18 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Bruno Postle <bruno(a)postle.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |18 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: upnp and patents

by Hans de Goede

Tanguy Eric wrote: > Hi, this soft make what i hate : integrate another project. Mediatomb > integrate in the tarball a quite old version of libupnp (1.6.1) which is > BSD license (http://pupnp.sourceforge.net/). Fedora have libupnp 1.6.2 > in stable and 1.6.3 is pending. > I hope this package will not interfere with fedora libupnp. > There is also libdlna (http://libdlna.geexbox.org/) which is an > extension of libupnp. Libdlna is patent encumbred because it uses ffmpeg > and is now part of livna. > > In conclusion, Mediatomb uses pupnp software which is patent free but it > duplicates software ... > Thanks for your reply, can you please add your comment about Mediatomb using its own private copy of libupnp to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 Then the packager should patch is so that it will use the system version instead, Thanks! Regards, Hans > Regards > > Eric Tanguy > > Le mercredi 02 janvier 2008 à 12:28 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I know that there has been some work done recently on some upnp packages for >> livna as there were some patent issues, today I stumbled over this review in >> Fedora: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 >> >> Can someone who knows a bit more check wether this piece of upnp software is >> patent stuff free? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> ___________________________________________ >> Freeworld mailing list: Freeworld(a)livna.org >> http://livna.org/mailman/listinfo/freeworld > > ___________________________________________ > Freeworld mailing list: Freeworld(a)livna.org > http://livna.org/mailman/listinfo/freeworld >

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

upnp and patents

by Hans de Goede

Hi, I know that there has been some work done recently on some upnp packages for livna as there were some patent issues, today I stumbled over this review in Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 Can someone who knows a bit more check wether this piece of upnp software is patent stuff free? Regards, Hans

16 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2008