November 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 175] New: Review Request: viafb - The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175 Summary: Review Request: viafb - The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/viafb/viafb.spec SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/viafb/viafb-2.6.04-3.fc10.src.rpm Summary: The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics Fedora forbids out of tree kernel module. That the reason of this package submission here. Work have been done to merge this module into the kernel, but this task seems to have been dropped, there is not timeline for this merge. The above module does not permit kernel mode setting with "via" hardware and Fedora 10. The module is unloaded by default, -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 176] New: Review Request: viafb-kmod - The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176 Summary: Review Request: viafb-kmod - The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/viafb/viafb-kmod.spec SRPMS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/rawhide/SRPMS/viafb-kmod-2.6.04-8.fc10.src... Summary: The console framebuffer driver for VIA graphics The x86_64 build doesn't worked for me. If someone report it to work, i will re-enable it... "via" GPU are only available on %{ix86}. If there is arch where it is available and build fine that i don't know, please report it. It will be fixed later. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 89] New: Review request: avbin - Cross-platform media decoding library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89 Summary: Review request: avbin - Cross-platform media decoding library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 ----------------files-------------------------------------------- SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/avbin.spec SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/avbin-7-0.20081023svn.1.fc9.src.rpm ----------------%description------------------------------------- AVbin is a thin wrapper around FFmpeg, providing binary compatibility for applications and languages that need it. FFmpeg is a collection of audio and video codecs widely used in projects such as mplayer, xine, gstreamer and VLC. It is under continuous development; so much that its developers rarely provide a release, and SVN snapshots of the library must be statically linked to avoid version incompatibilities. AVbin allows programs that require dynamic linkage to use FFmpeg. It does this by providing * an accurate version number within the shared library, allowing applications to select the appropriate data structures and functions to use at runtime, and * a simplified interface with an unchanging ABI to the most common decoding functionality within FFmpeg. AVbin is distributed as a single dynamic library that depends on no other files or installations. ---------------Why rpmfusion?------------------------------------- As was said in the description, this package includes a copy of ffmpeg statically linked. Hence it should be in rpmfusion. ---------------rpmlint-------------------------------------------- [orcan@desitter SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/avbin-7-20081023svn.1.fc9.src.rpm avbin.src:87: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is the configure script of ffmpeg. We don't need to specify a libdir since ffmpeg will be compiled into libavbin.so later (which has a libdir). [orcan@desitter SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/avbin-* avbin.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libavbin.so avbin.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/libavbin.so.7 I wasn't sure how to package this file. Should I put libavbin.so into the devel package (it's just a symlink to libavbin.so.7)? Also, can we ignore the error message since avbin has no apparent dependencies? ---------------note----------------------------------------------- I wanted to have this package in rpmfusion because I will also package pyglet soon and that one depends on avbin. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 57] New: doc - CVS request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 Summary: doc - CVS request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: packages(a)marcbradshaw.co.uk Blocks: 33 Estimated Hours: 0.0 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: doc Short Description: Diagnose unhealthy DNS domains Owners: packages(a)marcbradshaw.co.uk Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: packages(a)marcbradshaw.co.uk Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 26] New: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 Summary: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec srpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.2.20080217svn11... Description: dvbcut is a Qt application that allows you to select certain parts of an MPEG transport stream (as received via Digital Video Broadcasting, DVB) and save these parts into a single MPEG output file. It follows a "keyhole surgery" approach where the input video and audio data is mostly kept unchanged, and only very few frames at the beginning and/or end of the selected range are re-encoded in order to obtain a valid MPEG file. For mpeg video playback dvbcut can use mplayer if available. No can do in Fedora: manipulates mpeg2 transport and program streams, and requires ffmpeg. See also: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-October/msg02398.html rpmlint: is silent for i386|debuginfo|src rpms/ rpmfusion: first timer. 1 package in Fedora: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/glglobe/#dirlist -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
44
0 / 0

[Bug 96] New: Review request: broadcom wireless kmod (wl-kmod)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96 Summary: Review request: broadcom wireless kmod (wl-kmod) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://www.cenolan.com/fedora9/broadcom-wl/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: chris(a)cenolan.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 This package contains Broadcom's IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n hybrid Linux device driver for use with Broadcom's BCM4311-, BCM4312-, BCM4321-, and BCM4322 based hardware. This is my first package for RPM Fusion. Jarod Wilson is co-maintainer and Thorsten Leemhuis is my sponsor. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint wl-kmod.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/kmod-wl-5.10.27.6-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm kmod-wl.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64-5.10.27.6-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized wl kernel module(s) for 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64 kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64/extra/wl/wl.ko 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm broadcom-wl.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6/LICENSE.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/wl-kmod-debuginfo-5.10.27.6-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I believe all 5 warnings above can be safely ignored but I am happy to stand corrected! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
39
0 / 0

[Bug 29] New: Review request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Summary: Review request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc(a)foresightlinux.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/freesci.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/freesci-0.6.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: FreeSCI is a portable interpreter for SCI (Sierra Creative Interpreter) games, such as the Space Quest series (starting with SQ3) or Leisure Suit Larry (2 and sequels). Not in Fedora: "Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included." -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 - This is my first rpmfusion package - I made fbpanel (Fedora 8/9), XQF (in review) and various Foresight Linux packages -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years

1
5
0 / 0

Conflicts

by Michael Schwendt

dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-3.fc10.noarch in rpmfusion-free-development-i686 File conflict with: vdrsync-0.1.3-9.PRE1.050322.fc10.noarch /usr/bin/dvd-menu vdrsync-0.1.3-9.PRE1.050322.fc10.noarch in rpmfusion-free-development-i686 File conflict with: dvd-slideshow-0.8.0-3.fc10.noarch /usr/bin/dvd-menu foo2oak-0.20080826-1.fc10.i386 in rpmfusion-free-development-i686 File conflict with: foomatic-3.0.2-67.fc10.i386 /usr/share/foomatic/db/source/printer/HP-Color_LaserJet_1500.xml http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1474 normalize-0.7.7-4.fc10.i386 in rpmfusion-free-development-i686 File conflict with: html-xml-utils-3.7-6.fc10.i386 /usr/share/man/man1/normalize.1.gz A "Conflicts" tag has been set in html-xml-utils in F11 devel. Upstream html-xml-utils has renamed the manual in >= 5.0. streamdvd-streamanalyze-0.4-8.fc10.i386 in rpmfusion-free-development-i686 File conflict with: lsdvd-0.16-10.fc10.i386 /usr/bin/lsdvd Still not resolved? http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183 http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1762

16 years

5
5
0 / 0

the libdvdcss issue

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

Hi. I'd like to bring up the topic once again. I've been discussing it with Nicolas and noticed that both rpmfusion.pl and rpmfusion.fr domains are free. Nicolas said he could arrange for hosting libdvdcss in France under such domain and so could I, in Poland. Is it OK if we use the RPMFusion name for that purpose or isn't it? IIRC someone said earlier that some people wouldn't contribute to RPMFusion if it was in any way associated with distribution of libdvdcss, but never mentioned any names or what these contributors would bring to RPMFusion. Frankly I'm a bit tired of this game, but I'm willing to do whatever I can to provide users with complete DVD playback capability. So what CAN I do? Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

16 years

13
30
0 / 0

suns' java leagal issues

by مؤيد السعدي

there was a long heated thread on fedora ML titled "Proposal: Rolling Release" and some people mentioned something about sun's java and ubuntu was mentioned > How many years has fedora policy forced a horribly fractured 3rd party repository situation - and not had a working java at all while Ubuntu's approach was much more ensible? > All I can say is that with Ubuntu you can pick vendor drivers and Sun Java 1.5 from the software management tool and you almost never have to worry about conflicts among packages from the different repositories. I've repeatedly requested these things in fedora and been repeatedly told it wasn't going to happen. the rpm provided by sun is broken, and I was advised by fedora solved not to use the rpm and to use the self installer any of the two mean that I can't use package manager to get it I can't install netbeans ..etc. from package manager ..etc. I think it's very easy to make a sun's tarball into a good rpm the have the proper Provides: section and that uses fedora's alternatives ...etc. but when I asked about this I was told they they can't be redistributed, if this is the case how did ubuntu people did it ? we have a non-free section in rpmfusion, in ubuntu world they call it "multiverse" http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components I noticed that they ship sun's java http://javachannel.net/wiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JavaOnUbuntu sun-java6-jdk sun-java6-jre why we don't pack suns' java like them ? is there any legal issue ? and what are the counter legal procedures done by ubuntu people in order to provide that package and redistribute it

16 years

11
30
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2008