[Bug 302] New: Review request: shorten - Fast, low complexity audio compressor
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
Summary: Review request: shorten - Fast, low complexity audio
compressor
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: bjohnson(a)symetrix.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/shorten.spec
SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/shorten-3.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
Shorten is a fast, low complexity waveform coder (i.e. audio compressor),
originally written by Tony Robinson at SoftSound. It can operate in both lossy
and lossless modes.
Why not Fedora?: Package license contains limitations on commercial use.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint *rpm
shorten.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use Only
shorten.src: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use Only
shorten-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use
Only
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I was unsure what to put for the license tag since it doesn't fit a "standard"
license.
This is my first rpmfusion package - although I have packages in Fedora proper.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 283] New: revel - Really easy video encoding library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283
Summary: revel - Really easy video encoding library
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fabian(a)bernewireless.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL: http://bernewireless.net/files/rpms/revel.spec
SRPM URL: http://bernewireless.net/files/rpms/revel-1.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
Project URL: http://revel.sourceforge.net/
Description:
Revel is a library designed to be the shortest, simplest path between
your application and high-quality well-compressed video output. Any
program that generates a series of successive images (e.g. video games,
3D graphics applications, media players, animation packages) can use Revel
to output a compressed AVI video, without having to know hardly anything
about the overwhelming esoterica of video encoding. Revel is implemented
in C++, but the public API is in plain old C for maximum compatibility.
Why not in Fedora?
Because xvidcore is not in Fedora.
rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint revel*
revel.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/revel.h
revel.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/librevel.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
I'm not able to build a proper -debuginfo file because of that I added '%define
debug_package %{nil}' to suppress the rpmlint warning about this.
[fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint revel-1.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
This is my first package for RPMFusion.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 167] New: Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for anyRemote
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167
Summary: Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for
anyRemote
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://anyremote.sf.net
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: anyremote(a)mail.ru
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
anyRemote is bluetooth remote control software.
anyremote-J2ME-client is J2ME client for anyRemote. This J2ME client should
be installed on JSR-82 capabled cell phone.
SRPM
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-J2ME-client-4.10-1.f...
Beware: Actually to build anyremote-J2ME-client it needs to install Sun WTK
and Proguard.
So, if possible i can specify SRPM and .spec for package which contains
prebuild
java midlet. This can simplify package build process by elimination of
Sun WTK-Proguard toolchain.
This package can not be included into Fedora because it uses for build Sun WTK
toolkit, which is free, but not open source.
This is my first RPM Fusion package (and i have 4 packages in Fedora repo).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 48] New: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48
Summary: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on
Linux
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://freej.dyne.org
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SRPM:
http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej-0.10-8.20080726.fc9.src...
SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej.spec
FreeJ is a digital instrument for video livesets, featuring realtime
rendering of multilayered video and chained effect filtering directly
on the screen. It plays with video4linux devices, DIVX/AVI files, and
PNG images, letting you dynamically apply on each layer a chain of
effect plugins.
NOTE: This package is hard-coded to require an MMX capable processor.
RPMLINT:
freej.i386: I: checking
freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js
"/usr/local/bin/freej"
freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js 0644
freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan.js
"/usr/local/bin/freej"
freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan.js 0644
freej.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/freej
freej.src: I: checking
freej.src:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make
freej-debuginfo.i386: I: checking
freej-devel.i386: I: checking
freej.spec:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings.
FreeJ has a built in javascript interpreter. rpmlint is not intelligent enough
to realize this. The rest is a silly warning.
This package depends on libffmpeg which is not available in Fedora.
Note: First time submitter.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 118] New: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Summary: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video
capturing, compositing, and editing
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com
CC: matthias(a)rpmforge.net, rpmfusion-package-
review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SRPMS:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv-2.1-22.g...
SPECS:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv.spec
Summary: Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing
I would like to help merging cinelerra-cv within RPM Fusion.
Few notes:
cinelerra need to be renamed to cinelerra-cv because the cinelerra name is from
Herroine-Virtual, Hence there is a need to avoid conflicting namespace.(it
remains to have the locale renamed along with some internals libraries
dropped).
--with libmpeg3_system is meant to be used with libmpeg3 from current rawhide.
F-8/F-9 will use the current internal snapshot. This is the most recent patch.
Might need the same patch for mpeg2enc (will needs more testing).
Some of the patches still bundled was already submitted upstream. But
unfortunately, the "community upstream" failed to understand why they are
needed.
I will give a re-try today.
@Matthias
I would like to co-maintain cinelerra-cv with you. But the current way bugzilla
works for now, assume the primary owner to be the default assigned e-mail to
any bugreport.
Would you agree if I'm this primary owner ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 459] New: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459
Summary: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA
Toolkit libraries
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki...
SRPM:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki...
Description:
NVIDIA(R)CUDA(TM) is a general purpose parallel computing architecture
that leverages the parallel compute engine in NVIDIA graphics
processing units (GPUs) to solve many complex computational problems
in a fraction of the time required on a CPU. It includes the CUDA
Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and the parallel compute engine in
the GPU. To program to the CUDATM architecture, developers can, today,
use C, one of the most widely used high-level programming languages,
which can then be run at great performance on a CUDATM enabled
processor. Other languages will be supported in the future, including
FORTRAN and C++.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
Not open source.
rpmlint output:
>rpmlint ../SRPMS/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-2.1-1.src.rpm
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
This is ok, even moving file from the hardcoded path.
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src: W: no-%build-section
Nothing to build. This, however, implies no stripping & no debuginfo.
Unfortunately, debuginfo creation fails because the binaries don't contatin
build id. I don't know whether there is something I could do with this.
>rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-*
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/bec
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/inline
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/be
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gfec
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/nvopencc
See the previous comment.
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufft.so.2.1
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libcufftemu.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libcudart.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
Again, there is nothing we can do with this, AFAIK.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora packager (both FAS
names are mjakubicek). My primary motivation to package this is that I maintain
a CUDA-enabled application, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 7 months
[Bug 461] New: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461
Summary: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries
and executables
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec
SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
$ rpmlint openmotif-devel-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint openmotif-demos-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/fontsel/creation-c.c
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/earth/earth.c
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/wsm/wsm_cb.h
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/todo/io.c
$ rpmlint openmotif-mwm-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-mwm.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Why not in Fedora?
Package contains a nonfree license:
Plese refer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif
Known issues:
opemmotif-devel has a conflict with lesstif-devel. But mesa-libGLw-devel
depends on lesstif-devel. So we need a virtual provides 'motif-devel' on
lesstif-devel and mesa-libGLw-devel.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
14 years, 3 months