July 2009 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 719] New: avidemux-plugins - Plugins for the avidemux video editing and transcoding tool

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719 Summary: avidemux-plugins - Plugins for the avidemux video editing and transcoding tool Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/avidemux/avidemux-pluins.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/avidemux/avidemux-plugins-2.5.0-1... Description: This package contains various plugins for avidemux. This package is not eligible for Fedora because it links against ffmpeg. Backgound info: In avidemux 2.5, the main package now provides some shared libraries which the plugins link against at compile time. Because of this, the main package must be compiled & installed first before compiling any plugins. For compatibility reasons, avidemux will now be metapackage which tracks in the appropriate subpackages (main libraries, gtk interface, plugins) to enable the same functionality as the previous 2.3/2.4 installations of avidemux (I've uploaded the new avidemux 2.5 SRPM here [1], I'll the commit the changes once this package is reviewed). rpmlint output: avidemux-plugins.x86_64: W: no-documentation [1] http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/avidemux/avidemux-2.5.0-1.fc11.sr... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-07-30

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: 2 NEW freetype-freeworld-2.3.9-3.fc11 : A free and portable font rendering engine NEW libmad-0.15.1b-13.fc11 : MPEG audio decoder library ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 1 vlc-1.0.1-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 11: freetype-freeworld-2.3.9-3.fc11 ------------------------------- * Tue Jul 28 2009 Kevin Kofler <Kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2.3.9-3 - Add freetype-2.3.9-aliasing.patch to fix Navit crash (rh#513582) libmad-0.15.1b-13.fc11 ---------------------- * Sun Jul 19 2009 David Juran <david(a)juran.se> - 0.15.1b-13 - ppc asm patch from David Woodhouse (Bz 730) - rpmlint warnings * Wed Jul 01 2009 David Juran <david(a)juran.se> - 0.15.1b-12 - fix typo in multiarch patch - fix ppc64 version (Bz 691) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: vlc-1.0.1-1.fc11 ---------------- * Tue Jul 28 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 1.0.1-1 - Update to 1.0.1 (Final) - Improve conditionals - Backport zip qt4 from 1.0-bugfix - More %_isa requirement

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-07-30

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 2 nvidia-kmod-185.18.29-1.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-185.18.29-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: nvidia-kmod-185.18.29-1.fc11 ---------------------------- * Thu Jul 30 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 185.18.29-1 - Update to 185.18.29 (final) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-185.18.29-1.fc11 ------------------------------------ * Thu Jul 30 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 185.18.29-1 - Update to 185.18.29 (final)

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

ffmpeg-php

by manuel "lonely wolf" wolfshant

Hello I am trying to package ffmpeg-php and use rpmfusion's ffmpeg package. My package compiles (and works ) fine on centos 5 when using the package from rpmforge. However, when using fedora + rpmfusion (or centos + rpmfusion), mock build fails because it does seem to not be able to locate the ffmpeg headers. Excerpt from working (rpmforge) build log: checking for ffmpeg support... yes, shared checking whether to force gd support in ffmpeg-php... no checking for ffmpeg headers... ...found in /usr/include/libavcodec checking for ffmpeg libavcodec.so... ...found in /usr/lib checking for ffmpeg swscale support... yes checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld Same when using rpmfusion: checking for ffmpeg support... yes, shared checking whether to force gd support in ffmpeg-php... no checking for ffmpeg headers... configure: error: ffmpeg headers not found. Make sure ffmpeg is compiled as shared libraries using the --enable-shared option RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38650 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38650 (%build) The config.m4 contains: dnl Determine path to ffmpeg libs if test "$PHP_FFMPEG" != "no"; then dnl Default directories to check for ffmpeg headers INC_CHECK_DIRS="/usr/local /usr" dnl User has specified using --with=ffmpeg=[dir] a directory where we should dnl look for ffmpeg headers. Prepend this directory to the default dirs so it dnl gets checked first. if test "$PHP_FFMPEG" != "yes"; then INC_CHECK_DIRS="$PHP_FFMPEG $INC_CHECK_DIRS" fi AC_MSG_CHECKING(for ffmpeg headers) for i in $INC_CHECK_DIRS ; do if test -f $i/include/ffmpeg/avcodec.h; then PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/ffmpeg) FFMPEG_INC_FOUND=$i/include/ffmpeg break elif test -f $i/include/avcodec.h; then PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include) FFMPEG_INC_FOUND=$i/include break elif test -f $i/include/libavcodec/avcodec.h; then dnl ffmpeg svn revision 12194 and newer put each header in its own dir dnl so we have to include them all. PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libavcodec/) PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libavformat/) PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libavutil/) PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libswscale/) PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libavfilter/) PHP_ADD_INCLUDE($i/include/libavdevice/) FFMPEG_INC_FOUND=$i/include/libavcodec break fi done if test -z "$FFMPEG_INC_FOUND"; then AC_MSG_RESULT() AC_MSG_ERROR([ffmpeg headers not found. Make sure ffmpeg is compiled as shared libraries using the --enable-shared option]) else AC_MSG_RESULT(...found in $FFMPEG_INC_FOUND) fi If I am not mistaken, these checks should accommodate the different directory structure (rpmforge uses a single directory for all headers, our package seems to have the headers split as described above under the "svn revision 12194" section"). I have tried passing different "--with-ffmpeg=" variants, but none was successful. My current attempts are available at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg-php/ Any ideas, please ? TIA wolfy

15 years, 4 months

3
2
0 / 0

package name ffmpeg-php

by manuel "lonely wolf" wolfshant

Hello I am trying to package ffmpeg-php but I am not sure what name should the package have. Everybody knows the application as ffmpeg-php, but current guidelines seem to imply that the package name should be php-ffmpeg-php (in which case I will add Provides: ffmpeg-php to facilitate yum searches) What do you think ? wolfy

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-07-29

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 1 bsnes-0.048-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 1 sdlmess-0133-1.fc11 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 sdlmess-0133-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 sdlmess-0133-1.fc12 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: bsnes-0.048-1.fc11 ------------------ * Tue Jul 14 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.048-1 - Updated to 0.048 - Updated the Fedora readme ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: sdlmess-0133-1.fc11 ------------------- * Fri Jul 24 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0133-1 - Updated to 0.133 - Made the -data subpackage noarch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: sdlmess-0133-1.fc10 ------------------- * Sat Jul 25 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0133-1 - Updated to 0.133 - Made the -data subpackage noarch ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: sdlmess-0133-1.fc12 ------------------- * Fri Jul 24 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0133-1 - Updated to 0.133 - Made the -data subpackage noarch

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion

by Andrea Musuruane

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Lucian Langa<cooly(a)gnome.eu.org> wrote: > I've submitted for review other emulator which didn't require any roms > at that time and it is still not accepted at this time. > It's really clear that no emulator is welcomed in fedora, fuse case (and > perhaps one or two more) was just a lucky one so I'm trying not to stir > any waters because with the current rules I doubt fuse is valid for > fedora. Other emulators that are in Fedora are Atari++, Hatari and OpenMSX which do not require the original ROMs of the systems to work, but they use they own open-source reimplementation. Bye, Andrea.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion

by Andrea Musuruane

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Lucian Langa<cooly(a)gnome.eu.org> wrote: >> Can you please tell me why? I cant see the difference between >> fuse-emulator and FBZX. > > There is no difference between the two but the current rules forbids it: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:SoftwareTypes > > >> Emulators >> Most emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not >> permitted for inclusion in Fedora. The rule of thumb to follow is: If >> it requires ROMs (or image files in any format) of copyrighted or >> patented material to be useful (and the owners of those copyrights and >> patents have not given their express written permission), then it's >> not permitted. > > Which is a total crap. > In the past it was possible to include FOSS emulator and remove roms as > it was done for fuse. Now I do not know exactly where it stands as > guidelines are intentionally made vague about this. Amstrad, the copyright owner of Spectrum ROMs has give express written permission to use the ROMs: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.amstrad.8bit/msg/c092cc4d4943131e Therefore Spectrum emulators are OK in Fedora. > If you do a search by closed review requests for term "emulator" you'll > see that most of emulators were rejected. Simcoupe, a SAM Coupé emulator got included because of the same reason: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 And it's ROMs even in Fedora because the copyright holder of the SAM Coupé ROM (Andrew Wright) and he has given permission to freely redistribute it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 As I understand, Amstrad do not want 3rd party to ship Spectrum ROMs for profit, which is something is possible using Fedora, therefore the ROMs aren't allowed in Fedora in this case. > You can take this with FESCO or block it for legal but you'll just waste > time and perhaps get fuse removed from fedora too. > I've submitted for review other emulator which didn't require any roms > at that time and it is still not accepted at this time. > It's really clear that no emulator is welcomed in fedora, fuse case (and > perhaps one or two more) was just a lucky one so I'm trying not to stir > any waters because with the current rules I doubt fuse is valid for > fedora. As I said, IMHO fuse is safe too. Bye, Andrea.

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion

by Andrea Musuruane

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk> Date: Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:04 PM Subject: Re: Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion To: Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> Cc: RPM Fusion developers discussion list <rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:57:17PM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Lucian Langa<cooly(a)gnome.eu.org> wrote: > > Unfortunately only a few spectrum roms are provided by above package. > > As I understand package was created to simplify spectrum emulators > > installation and roms were downloaded from Philip's website why not > > include all roms provided there ? > > I think that if we can provide Colin a list of ROMs required for > inclusion, he will add them. He already did so in the past upon a > request by FBZX maintainer. Colin, you are in CC, what's your thought > about this? Sure, just give me the list you need. I think I was just trying to keep the size under control by not adding the ROMs that were essentially only of theoretical interest. -- Colin Watson [cjwatson(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk]

15 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Spectrum ROMs in RPM Fusion

by Andrea Musuruane

Hi all, I'm going to submit FBZX, a Spectrum emulator, for review in Fedora. Fedora allows the packaging of Spectrum emulators but it doesn't allow Spectrum ROMs, even though they are distributable. Therefore I'll have to remove the ROMs from the tarball as it is currently done by fuse-emulator. Since there is just one Spectrum emulator in Fedora, the required ROMs are currently shipped in RPM Fusion by the package fuse-emulator-roms. My idea is to make a package called spectrum-roms and submit it for inclusion in RPM Fusion. All packaged Spectrum emulators will have to be patched to find the required ROMs under /usr/share/spectrum-roms/ and should have a README.Fedora file that should forward the user to RPM Fusion to install spectrum-roms. Probably it will also be a good idea to document this on RPM Fusion wiki. I'm going to use the same upstream Debian uses. Both Debian package and upstream are maintained by Colin Watson who is in CC. http://packages.debian.org/sid/spectrum-roms http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/code/spectrum-roms/ Lucian, as the maintainer of fuse-emulator, can you please check if all the ROMs it requires are currently shipped by upstream "spectrum-roms"? Please let me know your thought about this plan. Thanks. Bye, Andrea.

15 years, 4 months

4
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2009