Multi-card nVidia driver patch
by Bob Richmond
The new vga arbiter API in Fedora 12's kernel breaks the nVidia driver
when used with multiple cards. Drivers that don't need legacy VGA I/O
are supposed to opt-out of VGA Arbitration.
I posted a patch to nvnews last night that is working for a few people
(including myself) for multi-card configurations.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142656
Can the nvidia driver maintainer incorporate the patch in the rpmfusion
package? The patch is attached.
14 years, 11 months
BuildSystem stuck
by Jack Neely
Folks,
It looks as if the build system is stuck. I've had packages "building"
for 16 or so hours. The PPC arches build, but not the intel arches.
Jack
--
Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu>
Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services
Office of Information Technology, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
14 years, 11 months
CVS Admin Request
by Jack Neely
Folks,
I've got a CVS permissions problem with the openafs-kmod package:
**** Access denied: jjneely is not in ACL for rpms/openafs-kmod/F-11
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
This is Bug 803.
Xavier, can you help me out?
Jack Neely
--
Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu>
Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services
Office of Information Technology, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
14 years, 11 months
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2010-01-05
by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12: 2
vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc12
vlc-1.0.4-2.fc12
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 2
NEW openafs-1.4.11-10.fc11 : Enterprise Network File System
vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc11
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2
NEW vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc13 : Hollywood+/DXR3 output plugin for VDR
vlc-1.0.4-2.fc13
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/12:
vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc12
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <felix(a)fetzig.org> - 0.2.10-2
- added missing BuildReq: gettext
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <heffer(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.10-1
- new upstream release
vlc-1.0.4-2.fc12
----------------
* Mon Jan 04 2010 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.4-2
- Add vlc-1.0.4-xulrunner-191.patch
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11:
openafs-1.4.11-10.fc11
----------------------
* Mon Jan 04 2010 Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu> 0:1.4.11-10
- Add a BuildRequires for bison to build on PPC
vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc11
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <felix(a)fetzig.org> - 0.2.10-2
- added missing BuildReq: gettext
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <heffer(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.10-1
- new upstream release
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development:
vdr-dxr3-0.2.10-2.fc13
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <felix(a)fetzig.org> - 0.2.10-2
- added missing BuildReq: gettext
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Felix Kaechele <heffer(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.10-1
- new upstream release
vlc-1.0.4-2.fc13
----------------
* Sun Jan 03 2010 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.4-2
- Add vlc-1.0.4-xulrunner-192.patch
* Tue Dec 15 2009 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.4-1
- Update to 1.0.4
- Drop patch2 - PulseaAudio is tried first from original sources.
14 years, 11 months
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2010-01-05
by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12: 2
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc12
sdlmame-0136-1.fc12
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 2
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc11
sdlmame-0136-1.fc11
============================================================================
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 2
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc13
sdlmame-0136-1.fc13
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/12:
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc12
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.17.b13
- Updated to 0.2b13
- Dropped the cflags patch
- Dropped the additional Fedora configs
* Sat Nov 21 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.16.b12
- Updated to 0.2b12
- Worked around RH bug 532763 for Fedora 12 and above
- Added Fedora 12 and Fedora 13 configs
sdlmame-0136-1.fc12
-------------------
* Fri Jan 01 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0136-1
- Updated to 0.136
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11:
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc11
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.17.b13
- Updated to 0.2b13
- Dropped the cflags patch
- Dropped the additional Fedora configs
* Sat Nov 21 2009 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.16.b12
- Updated to 0.2b12
- Worked around RH bug 532763 for Fedora 12 and above
- Added Fedora 12 and Fedora 13 configs
sdlmame-0136-1.fc11
-------------------
* Fri Jan 01 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0136-1
- Updated to 0.136
============================================================================
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development:
qmc2-0.2-0.17.b13.fc13
----------------------
* Sat Jan 02 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.17.b13
- Updated to 0.2b13
- Dropped the cflags patch
- Dropped the additional Fedora configs
sdlmame-0136-1.fc13
-------------------
* Fri Jan 01 2010 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0136-1
- Updated to 0.136
14 years, 11 months
Buildsystem questions
by Jack Neely
Folks,
I've run a build of the openafs package and it fails on the PPC arches.
Build logs are here:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-11-rpmfusion_free/6010-openafs-...
Errors in question are:
make[3]: execvp: bison: Permission denied
I'm not familar with building and maintaining things on PPC arches at
all, however that looks like a problem on the build host. Is that
correct?
Are the PPC arches required for the packages to be approved for the
testing/production repositories?
Thanks!
Jack
--
Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu>
Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services
Office of Information Technology, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
14 years, 11 months
Introduction
by John Arntz
Greetings!
My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages that RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a programmer, but I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my first package submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on FCE Ultra. My first question, though, where would be a good place to host the .spec and .srpm files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of sites like rapidshare, megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure if those would be the best places to host the files. Once I am able to find a place to post them, I will take the plunge and file my submission for review. Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based on GFCE Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two separate packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds included in
the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
John S. Arntz
14 years, 11 months
