October 2010 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 1316] New: Review Request: ffms2 - An FFmpeg based source library for easy frame accurate access

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1316 Summary: Review Request: ffms2 - An FFmpeg based source library for easy frame accurate access Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpm(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ffms2.spec SRPM: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ffms2-2.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: FFmpegSource (usually known as FFMS or FFMS2) is a cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg, plus some additional components to deal with file formats FFmpeg's libavformat has (or used to have) problems with. It gives you an easy, convenient way to say "open and decompress this media file for me, I don't care how you do it" and get frame- and sample-accurate access (usually), without having to bother with the sometimes less than straightforward and less than perfectly documented FFmpeg API. The library is written in C++, but the public API is C-friendly and it should be possible to simply include and link directly with a pure C application. The source is available under the MIT license, but the binaries are GPL licensed because they need to be linked against a GPL'd FFmpeg. Why not in Fedora? It's a wrapper around FFmpeg with strict dependency. $ rpmlint ffms2* ffms2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libavformat -> informative, malformation, informatics ffms2.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ffmpegsource.googlecode.com/files/ffms2-2.13_src.7z HTTP Error 404: Not Found ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libavformat -> informative, malformation, informatics ffms2.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffms2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ffms -> fums, ff ms, ff-ms ffms2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffms -> fums, ff ms, ff-ms ffms2-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffms2-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffmsindex 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1453] New: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1453 Summary: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libaacs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libaacs-0.1-0.1.20100817.fc13.src.rpm Description: This library is an open implementation of the AACS specification. It can be dlopen'ed by libbluray if present and allows decryption of AACS protected bluray disc. The keys are NOT provided. This package was rejected by Red Hat Legal team. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603 It depends on libbluray, which is under review for Fedora. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 I'm already a Fedora packager, but I don't maintain any package for RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1171] New: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Summary: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump.spec SRPM: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump-2.2c-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: rtmpdump is a toolkit for RTMP streams. All forms of RTMP are supported, including rtmp://, rtmpt://, rtmpe://, rtmpte://, and rtmps://. Not suitable for Fedora because it was subject to a DMCA takedown request because it "can be used to download copyrighted works"... much like a web browser can: http://www.chillingeffects.org/anticircumvention/notice.cgi?NoticeID=25159 rpmlint whines about spelling errors on the names of the various rtmp-based protocols, but has no valid objections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 3 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 195] New: Review request: perl-Crypt-IDEA - Perl interface to IDEA block cipher

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 Summary: Review request: perl-Crypt-IDEA - Perl interface to IDEA block cipher Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: paul(a)city-fan.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.08... This perl extension is an implementation of the IDEA block cipher algorithm. The module implements the Crypt::BlockCipher interface. The IDEA algorithm is patented in Europe and the United States by Ascom-Tech AG. The package is rpmlint-clean. This is my first RPM Fusion package; I am a sponsor in Fedora and have already been sponsored for RPM Fusion cvs access by Thorsten Leemhuis. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 4 months

3
22
0 / 0

[Bug 1035] New: Review request: amap - Network tool for application protocol detection

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035 Summary: Review request: amap - Network tool for application protocol detection Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rebus(a)seznam.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org, rebus(a)seznam.cz Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/amap.spec SRPM: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/amap-5.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: THC Amap is a next-generation tool for assistingnetwork penetration testing. It performs fast and reliable application protocol detection, independent on the TCP/UDP port they are being bound to. Package is based on the amap package from PLD linux using the patches used for the PLD src.rpm Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: AMAP license is applying extra restrictions to GPLv2 making it non-free for Fedora. This is also source of warning of rpmlint as this is not approved license. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2010-January/msg00003.html rpmlint output: amap.src: W: invalid-license GPLv2 with AMAP disclaimers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is my first (public) package for rpmfusion and fedora so I kindly ask for reviewer and sponsoring. Thank you Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 118] New: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Summary: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: matthias(a)rpmforge.net, rpmfusion-package- review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPMS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv-2.1-22.g... SPECS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv.spec Summary: Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing I would like to help merging cinelerra-cv within RPM Fusion. Few notes: cinelerra need to be renamed to cinelerra-cv because the cinelerra name is from Herroine-Virtual, Hence there is a need to avoid conflicting namespace.(it remains to have the locale renamed along with some internals libraries dropped). --with libmpeg3_system is meant to be used with libmpeg3 from current rawhide. F-8/F-9 will use the current internal snapshot. This is the most recent patch. Might need the same patch for mpeg2enc (will needs more testing). Some of the patches still bundled was already submitted upstream. But unfortunately, the "community upstream" failed to understand why they are needed. I will give a re-try today. @Matthias I would like to co-maintain cinelerra-cv with you. But the current way bugzilla works for now, assume the primary owner to be the default assigned e-mail to any bugreport. Would you agree if I'm this primary owner ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

2
33
0 / 0

[Bug 585] New: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 Summary: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Z-push is an implementation of the ActiveSync protocol which is used 'over-the-air' for multi platform ActiveSync devices, including Windows Mobile, iPhone, Sony Ericsson and Nokia mobile devices. With Z-push any groupware can be connected and synced with these devices. For use cases of Z-push with the Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration, please use the prepared package zarafa-z-push. I'll add the spec file and source rpm this evening or so, then I also will set RF_NEW blocker. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 is a blocker dependency as well. Before that, this package unluckily doesn't make that much sense. Of course z-push is nice with IMAP and so as well, but the main purpose is with Zarafa. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

2
40
0 / 0

[Bug 789] New: Review request: moc - Music on Console

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 Summary: Review request: moc - Music on Console Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rayllu(a)yahoo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/moc.spec Description: MOC (music on console) is a console audio player for LINUX/UNIX. This package is a modified version of the Fedora packages linked to from here: http://moc.daper.net/download MOC includes MP3 playback capabilities, which is why it's not eligible for the Fedora repositories. Like the 2.4.0 i386 packages, I could split the decoder plugins up and submit the MOC core to Fedora and the decoder plugins to RPM Fusion (though I'm not clear on exactly what functionality is and isn't allowed). Also to note is this review request in Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 The patch that I include allows the FFmpeg decoder plugin to build when ffmpeg-devel is installed, but it seems a bit hackish. $ rpmlint SRPMS/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. However, I should note that the debug package gets: $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/moc-debuginfo-2.4.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm moc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/moc-2.4.4/libltdl/.libs moc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/moc-2.4.4/libltdl/.libs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I am seeking a sponsor since this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 899] New: REVIEW: imagination - a DVD Slide Show Creator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899 Summary: REVIEW: imagination - a DVD Slide Show Creator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alsadi(a)ojuba.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 hi, this is my first trial to pack something for rpmfusion why not in fedora, because it depends on ffmpeg so it should be in rpmfusion-free the package is from http://imagination.sourceforge.net/ It's packing was straight forward. here is the .src.rpm http://www.ojuba.org/downloads/updates/3/SRPMS/imagination-2.1-1.oj3.src.rpm I build it on ojuba 3 (fedora 11) [alsadi@pc1 imagination]$ rpmlint /opt/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/imagination-2.1-1.oj3.i586.rpm imagination.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1-1 ['2.1-1.oj3', '2.1-1.oj3'] imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sl_SI/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1257] New: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1257 Summary: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lucas.jacobs(a)mines.sdsmt.edu CC: kwizart(a)gmail.com, rpmfusion-package- review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 1.5 Created an attachment (id=427) --> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=427) Diff from old SRPM to new SRPM, without the new CVS tarball SRPM: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac-0.4.6-0.4cvs20100527.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac.spec Description: GPAC is a multimedia framework based on the MPEG-4 Systems standard developed from scratch in ANSI C. The original development goal is to provide a clean, small and flexible alternative to the MPEG-4 Systems reference software. GPAC features the integration of recent multimedia standards (SVG/SMIL, VRML, X3D, SWF, 3GPP(2) tools and more) into a single framework. GPAC also features MPEG-4 Systems encoders/multiplexers, publishing tools for content distribution for MP4 and 3GPP(2) files and many tools for scene descriptions (MPEG4 <-> VRML <-> X3D converters, SWF -> MPEG-4, etc). Short version: This package is already in RPM Fusion, (patent concerns?) and used to include MP4Box, a popular muxing tool. Currently the binary RPM doesn't include MP4Box, and the source RPM doesn't build. This submission will fix that. rpmlint mentions some harmless comments in the spec file that I didn't remove because they were present in the previous version, and missing manpages for some binaries - manpages for mp4box and mp4client are provided, however. There's also the source tarball pulled straight from gpac's CVS repository which needs to be hosted somewhere. I've been using MP4Box built from this SRPM for a while, and it seems to work fine. Osmo4 crashes on start, but that's nothing new. I haven't tried the rest yet. I just finished getting the SRPM to cross-compile for a 32-bit target on a 64-bit platform, so that should be okay. This is my first RPM Fusion package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2010