March 2010 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 461] New: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 Summary: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr $ rpmlint openmotif-devel-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint openmotif-demos-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/fontsel/creation-c.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/earth/earth.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/wsm/wsm_cb.h openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/todo/io.c $ rpmlint openmotif-mwm-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-mwm.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Why not in Fedora? Package contains a nonfree license: Plese refer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif Known issues: opemmotif-devel has a conflict with lesstif-devel. But mesa-libGLw-devel depends on lesstif-devel. So we need a virtual provides 'motif-devel' on lesstif-devel and mesa-libGLw-devel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
36
0 / 0

[Bug 794] New: Review-request: r5u87x-loader - R5U87x webcam firmware loader

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794 Summary: Review-request: r5u87x-loader - R5U87x webcam firmware loader Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/r5u87x-loader.spec SRPM: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/r5u87x-loader-0.2.0-1.32a27008b8b9.fc1... This package contains a firmware load tool and udev rules to load the firmware needed to make cameras based on Ricoh R5U87x chipsets work with the uvcvideo driver. Why RPMFusion ? -> Non Free Why Non Free -> because of the firmware microcode files -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 9 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 782] New: Review Request: sonic-visualiser-freeworld - A program for viewing and exploring audio data

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782 Summary: Review Request: sonic-visualiser-freeworld - A program for viewing and exploring audio data Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Michael.Silvanus(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 spec: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/rpmfusion/sonic-visualiser-freeworl... srpm: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/rpmfusion/sonic-visualiser-freeworl... This is the Fedora package, additionally with MP3 support which cannot be shipped in Fedora. >From package description: Sonic Visualiser is an application for viewing and analysing the contents of music audio files. The aim of Sonic Visualiser is to be the first program you reach for when want to study a musical recording rather than simply listen to it. As well as a number of features designed to make exploring audio data as revealing and fun as possible, Sonic Visualiser also has powerful annotation capabilities to help you to describe what you find, and the ability to run automated annotation and analysis plugins in the Vamp analysis plugin format – as well as applying standard audio effects. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 1071] New: Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Summary: Review request: guvcview - GTK+ UVC Viewer and Capturer Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 description: A simple GTK interface for capturing and viewing video from devices supported by the linux UVC driver, although it should also work with any v4l2 compatible device. spec: http://thm.1erlei.de/review/guvcview.spec srpm: http://thm.1erlei.de/review/guvcview-1.2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint: no messages. why in rpmfusion: depends on twolame-devel and ffmpeg-devel. this is my first rpmfusion package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1024] New: Review request: pushover - Fun puzzle game with dominos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1024 Summary: Review request: pushover - Fun puzzle game with dominos Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/pushover.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/pushover-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Rearrange the dominoes on the different platforms so that you can start a chainreaction that makes all dominoes topple over. Not eligible to be included in Fedora: it uses some proprietary graphics from the original game. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pushover-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pushover-0.0.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm pushover.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pushover/data/FreeSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/gnu-free/FreeSans.ttf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pushover-debuginfo-0.0.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Bug 802] New: Review request: openafs - Enterprise Network File System

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802 Summary: Review request: openafs - Enterprise Network File System Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jjneely(a)ncsu.edu CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is my first RPM Fusion package, however I am a Fedora sponsored packager. These packages contain the userland bits for OpenAFS which depends on a 3rd party kernel module. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SPECS/openafs.spec http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SRPMS/openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm $ rpmlint openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/libafssetpag.so.1.0 openafs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libafsrpc.so.1.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.0 openafs.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/libafsrpc.so.1.1 openafs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libafsauthent.so.1.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.0 openafs.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Library issues: If we need to find/open a bug with the OpenAFS's bugtracker we can, but I don't think it wise to make API/ABI chages only in the version supplied by rpmfusion. dangerous-command-in-%preun: Required to clean up the OpenAFS cache in /var/cache/openafs $ rpmlint openafs-client-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-client.i586: W: no-documentation openafs-client.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/openafs 0700 Documentation provided in parent package. The cache directory must only be readable by root to avoid users being able to see other users' data. $ rpmlint openafs-devel-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-devel.i586: W: no-documentation openafs-devel.i586: E: zero-length /usr/include/afs/osi_inode.h I can remove osi_inode.h if needed. It is empty in the distribution tar ball. $ rpmlint openafs-server-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-server.i586: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

2
38
0 / 0

[Bug 803] New: Review request: openafs-kmod - Kernel Modules

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803 Summary: Review request: openafs-kmod - Kernel Modules Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jjneely(a)ncsu.edu CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is the matching kernel module for the OpenAFS packages. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SPECS/openafs-kmod.spec http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SRPMS/openafs-kmod-1.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm $ rpmlint openafs-kmod-1.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint kmod-openafs-1.4.11-1.fc11.i586.rpm kmod-openafs.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE-1.4.11-1.fc11.i686.rpm kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized openafs kernel module(s) for 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE/extra/openafs/openafs.ko kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I believe the above rpmlintage is pretty normal for kmods. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 828] New: Review Request: omnibook-kmod - Kernel module for HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite and Compal laptops

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828 Summary: Review Request: omnibook-kmod - Kernel module for HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite and Compal laptops Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpm(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod.spec SRPM URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.1.s... Description: Linux kernel module for many HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite (with Phoenix BIOS) and Compal laptops. It is based on the module found in the 'omke' project. And the -common package: Spec URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-common.spec SRPM URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-common-2.2009071... rpmlint output: kmod-omnibook.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized omnibook kernel module(s) for 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/omnibook/omnibook.ko kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

2
16
0 / 0

[Bug 952] New: Review request: Maelstrom - Space combat game

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952 Summary: Review request: Maelstrom - Space combat game Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/Maelstrom.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/Maelstrom-3.0.6-19.fc12.src.rpm Description : Maelstrom is a space combat game, originally ported from the Macintosh platform. Brave pilots get to dodge asteroids and fight off other ships at the same time. Note eligible for Fedora: It has just been blocked from rawhide because the data is non free: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529907 Note that the specfile is almost unchanged from the Fedora one, so this should be a simple review (I did some minor cleanups). rpmlint output: Maelstrom.src: W: invalid-license Distributable Maelstrom.x86_64: W: invalid-license Distributable Maelstrom-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Distributable Duh, that is why it is going to rpmfusion. Maelstrom.x86_64: E: score-file-must-not-be-conffile /var/lib/games/Maelstrom-Scores This is just plain wrong, if the high score file is not marked %config(noreplace), then the highscores will get reset to their defaults with each package update. Maelstrom.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/Maelstrom 02755 This is for the shared highscore file. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years

1
10
0 / 0

rpmfusion and no frozen rawhide

by Hans de Goede

Hi All, So how are we going to handle the new no frozen rawhide ? I see 2 options: 1) As soon as the branching point between rawhide and the pending next release (iow F-13 atm) has been reached (which is today). Change our buildsys mock setups to make builds for devel build from the new development/F-## repo. And delay forking until the final release of F-## gets real close. The advantage of doing this is that it is slightly less work, the disadvantage is that we have no repo tracking the real rawhide, which could lead to dep problems for people who want to keep consuming rawhide after the branch. 2) Do early branching, just like Fedora does. We could make it a bit easier on ourselves by immediately putting the new F-## repo next to the already released repo's instead of putting it under development like Fedora does. Regards, Hans

14 years

7
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers March 2010