[Bug 528] New: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528
Summary: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Depends on: 527
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec:
http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SPECS/mlt++.spec
Source:
http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/RPMFusion/SRPMS/mlt++-0.3.6-2.fc10....
Description:
This mlt sub-project provides a C++ wrapping for the MLT library.
MLT is an open source multimedia framework, designed and developed for
television broadcasting.
It provides a toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players,
transcoders, web streamers and many more types of applications. The
functionality of the system is provided via an assortment of ready to use
tools, xml authoring components, and an extendible plug-in based API.
This package hardly depend on ffmpeg library (without them is mostly useless),
so this is the main reason why I put them here.
rpmlint -mlt++
--------------
mlt++-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
mlt++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
There is no documentations provided by the author for devel package
No more warnings in source and binary RPMs.
Package tested with mock for i386 and x86_64 architectures.
This is one of my first packages on RPM Fusion.
On Fedora I put four packages last month. But I'm not yet sponsored there, so I
seeking for sponsor here.
kind regards,
Zarko
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 437] New: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on
Rails deployment system
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kanarip(a)kanarip.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec
SRPM:
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.6-2.fc10.sr...
Description:
Phusion Passenger is a deployment system for Ruby on Rails
applications on Apache, i.e. a 'mod_rails'. Rails deployment becomes an "upload
& done" process.
No eligible for inclusion to Fedora, because:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696#c7 (incompatible
licenses in the sources). No response or action from upstream parties.
rpmlint output:
[jmeeuwen@ghandalf result]$ rpmlint *.rpm
mod_passenger.i386: W: no-documentation
mod_passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_passenger.so 0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/passenger/native_support.so 0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.0.6/lib/passenger/ApplicationPoolServerExecutable
0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.0.6/bin/passenger-config
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/passenger-config
rubygem-passenger-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
rubygem-passenger-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings.
- These I will fix as soon as I can, except for:
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/passenger-config
The file is not a devel file
This is my first RPMFusion package
I am a Fedora Packager:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/kanarip
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 392] New: sp-auth - P2P internet TV
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392
Summary: sp-auth - P2P internet TV
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: oget.fedora(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/review/sp-auth.spec
SRPM: http://6mata.com:8014/review/sp-auth-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
SopCast is a simple, free way to broadcast video and audio or watch the video
and listen to radio on the Internet. Adopting P2P(Peer-to-Peer) technology, it
is very efficient and easy to use.
Why rpmfusion?
Upstream provides an i386 binary only.
rpmlint:
sp-auth.i386: W: invalid-license Freeware
sp-auth.i386: E: missing-PT_GNU_STACK-section /usr/bin/sp-sc-auth
sp-auth.src: W: invalid-license Freeware
I'm not sure if we can do anything about the E message above. Any opinions?
The downloads page of the upstream website [1] says:
All downloads (include SopPlayer and SopServer) and channel list can be
copied and distributed freely for anyone. Any portion of these may not be
sold, resold, or otherwise exploited for any commercial purpose that is not
expressly permitted by SopCast.
I also sent an email to them for double-checking. They replied:
Dear Orcan Ogetbil
Yes, you can include Sopcast Linux binary in RPMFusion repositories. The
software which you download from www.sopcast.com is freeware, and you can
use this letter as an official authorization for your distribution.
Best Regards
[1] http://www.sopcast.com/download/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 310] New: scid - A chess database application
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
Summary: scid - A chess database application
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: Mikhail.Kalenkov(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC - http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid.spec
SRPM -
http://katrine.lpi.ru/kalenkov/fusion/scid-3.6.26-12.3.7beta3.fc10.src.rpm
Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular
players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern
searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its
own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the
standard format for chess game files.
Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also
has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from
the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc.
Scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov
tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebases may be very important in the
endgame
analysis.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/scid.spec
SPECS/scid.spec:71: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/scid-3.6.26-12.3.7beta3.fc10.src.rpm
scid.src:71: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
RPMS/i386/scid-3.6.26-12.3.7beta3.fc10.i386.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
RPMS/i386/scid-sounds-3.6.26-12.3.7beta3.fc10.i386.rpm
scid-sounds.i386: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
RPMS/i386/scid-books-3.6.26-12.3.7beta3.fc10.i386.rpm
scid-books.i386: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[mkalenkov@sadki rpmbuild]$
PS
scid is my first RPM Fusion package.
I am seeking a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months