VirtualBox Status
by Sérgio Basto
Hi,
as a quick note.
yesterday , I saw virtualbox commits , and they do more than 5 patches,
to fix gcc compiles, so I think in next release of VirtualBox, I will be
able to compile on F-17 .
Regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
12 years, 9 months
Updating mplayer in F-16
by Julian Sikorski
Hi,
after taking care of mplayer in F-17+ I have tried to check which is the
latest mplayer compiling w/ ffmpeg in F-16. The answer is 2011-09-24
snapshot, aka r34129 - in r34130 CODEC_ID_G729 was added, which is
missing from ffmpeg-0.8 branch.
This is almost a month fresher than what we have now, and limited
testing shows it fixes [1] at least.
The question is why Rathann chose to update to 2011-08-16 (r34996)
snapshot on 23rd September. Rathann, do you happen to remember? Were
there any things blocking update to later snapshot?
If not, I would like to update mplayer in F-16 to the latest possible
snapshot.
Julian
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 1539] Review request: pithos - A Pandora client for the GNOME Desktop
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539
--- Comment #17 from Eric Work <work.eric(a)gmail.com> 2012-03-01 18:18:35 CET ---
Making the following change allowed me to build the RPM on F15 and workaround
the strange GTK bug during setup.
--- pithos.spec.orig 2011-12-17 20:06:58.000000000 -0800
+++ pithos.spec 2012-03-01 09:14:32.677645257 -0800
@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@
%{name}/plugins/notification_icon.py
%build
-%{__python} setup.py build
+env DISPLAY=:0 %{__python} setup.py build
%install
-%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
+env DISPLAY=:0 %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build
--prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
# Remove packaged pylast
rm -fr %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/pylast.py*
# Install icon
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 1901] Review request: bino - 3D video player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1901
Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|4 |33
--- Comment #29 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> 2012-03-01 15:28:06 CET ---
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: bino
Short Description: 3D video player
Owners: jskarvad(a)redhat.com
Branches: f16
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 1034] Review request: sinthgunt - An easy to use GUI for ffmpeg
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034
Jean-Francois Saucier <jsaucier(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|4 |33
--- Comment #24 from Jean-Francois Saucier <jsaucier(a)gmail.com> 2012-03-01 15:06:11 CET ---
Thanks a lot for taking the time to review my package! I will add the fix to
the icons line in the final version when I import my package into rpmfusion.
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: sinthgunt
Short Description: An easy to use GUI for ffmpeg
Owners: jfsaucier
Branches: f15 f16 f17
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 1901] Review request: bino - 3D video player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1901
--- Comment #25 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad(a)redhat.com> 2012-03-01 13:43:21 CET ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> However, the
> oxygen icons still worries me, partly because I'm not completely sure that they
> are not a "bundled library" issue. From a formal point of view they are(?)
> OTOH, the major argument not to bundle, security, just makes no sense here.
> More practically, bundling a set of icons is so common that making it a problem
> might be to open Pandora's box without any reasonable purpose.
>
It makes sense to me. I will try to unbundle them. Please stay tuned.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 1901] Review request: bino - 3D video player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1901
--- Comment #24 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2012-03-01 12:42:32 CET ---
Licensing experts are rare out here... I learned a little reading your reply :)
Basically, I can follow your arguments and they seem to be sound. However, the
oxygen icons still worries me, partly because I'm not completely sure that they
are not a "bundled library" issue. From a formal point of view they are(?)
OTOH, the major argument not to bundle, security, just makes no sense here.
More practically, bundling a set of icons is so common that making it a problem
might be to open Pandora's box without any reasonable purpose.
I'll wait until tomorrow. Unless there's more input on this issue then, I'll
approve.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 9 months
