April 2013 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2319] New: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 Bug #: 2319 Summary: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org MarkAd marks advertisements in VDR recordings. Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad.s... SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad-0... rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-markad-0.1.3-1.20120310git.fc17.x86_64.rpm vdr-markad.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-markad.so.1.7.27 vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/markad vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/plugins/markad vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/sk_SK/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/fi_FI/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary markad 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 2762] New: Review request: warsow - Fast paced 3D first person shooter

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2762 Bug #: 2762 Summary: Review request: warsow - Fast paced 3D first person shooter Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kalevlember(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/warsow.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/warsow-1.02-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Warsow is a fast paced first person shooter consisting of cel-shaded cartoon-like graphics with dark, flashy and dirty textures. Warsow is based on the E-novel "Chasseur de bots" ("Bots hunter" in English) by Fabrice Demurger. Warsow's codebase is built upon Qfusion, an advanced modification of the Quake II engine. ----- The package is GPL-licensed, but needs non-free data, which I'm submitting separately as warsow-data. The data files aren't suitable for inclusion in Fedora proper. This is my first rpmfusion package and I'd need rpmfusion sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2763] New: Review request: warsow-data - Game data for Warsow

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2763 Bug #: 2763 Summary: Review request: warsow-data - Game data for Warsow Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kalevlember(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/warsow-data.spec Description: Warsow is a fast paced first person shooter consisting of cel-shaded cartoon-like graphics with dark, flashy and dirty textures. Warsow is based on the E-novel "Chasseur de bots" ("Bots hunter" in English) by Fabrice Demurger. Warsow's codebase is built upon Qfusion, an advanced modification of the Quake II engine. This package installs the game data files (textures, maps, sounds, etc.). ----- The game-engine is GPL-licensed, but needs non-free data which isn't suitable for inclusion in Fedora proper. I've submitted the 'warsow' package separately in bug 2762. Note that I'm not uploading the srpm. Please use 'spectool -g warsow-data.spec' to retrieve the 500 MB data file tarball; I don't want to store it on fedorapeople.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2720] New: nvidia-settings-legacy - Configure the legacy NVIDIA graphics driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2720 Bug #: 2720 Summary: nvidia-settings-legacy - Configure the legacy NVIDIA graphics driver Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia-settings/nvidia-settings-le... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia-settings/nvidia-settings-le... Summary: Configure the legacy NVIDIA graphics driver This is a dedicated serie of the nvidia-settings tools to better track the support of legacy driver such as 173xx/96xx series. Since the 304xx driver support xrandr, it become more difficult to share the same tools there. The related "main package" changes are available in the same directory. SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia-settings/nvidia-settings.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2577] New: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2577 Bug #: 2577 Summary: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: greg.hellings(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos.spec SRPM file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Pithos is a native Pandora Radio client for Linux. It's much more lightweight than the Pandora.com web client, and integrates with desktop features such as media keys, notifications, and the sound menu. Ineligible for Fedora: relies on gstreamer-plugins-bad for codecs which are no provided in gstreamer-plugins-bad-free $ rpmlint results_pithos/20121123/1.fc17/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.*rpm pithos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pithos pithos.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pithos-20121123.tar.xz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. no-manual-page-for-binary pithos --- Ignored because none is provided by upstream invalid-url Source0 --- Ignored because upstream does not make tarball releases This is my first RPM Fusion package. I am a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 11 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2565] New: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565 Bug #: 2565 Summary: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Native linux client for Spotify's streaming music service. Spec: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client.spec Srpm: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client-0.8.4.103.g9cb17... Description: Think of Spotify as your new music collection. Your library. Only this time your collection is vast: millions of tracks and counting. Spotify comes in all shapes and sizes, available for your PC, Mac, home audio system and mobile phone. Wherever you go, your music follows you. And because the music plays live, there’s no need to wait for downloads and no big dent in your hard drive. Why not Fedora: closed source. Section: nonfree (closed source) rpmlint ~/Dropbox/Public/spotify/* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 2455] New: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455 Bug #: 2455 Summary: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: gbirchley(a)blueyonder.co.uk CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org The SPEC file and SRPM of this package are available at the following URLs (the files are compressed as tarballs to upload to forum)- SRPM: http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39887 SPEC - http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39888 Description: PCSX2 is an open source Playstation 2 emulator. It requires a dump of a real Playstation 2 BIOS, which is not included. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Fedora does not allow emulators The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages: $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm pcsx2.src:23: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag i686 [Comment: needs i686 packages to compile, will run in x86_64] pcsx2.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pcsx2.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1.0/pcsx2-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found [Comment: Compiled from subversion - have included shell script to build a tarball as a source and instructions for in comments] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.i686.rpm pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZCGReplayLoader [Comment:this is a debugging tool as pcsx2 is a WIP. Will help development to include this package, so users can follow debug insructions from developers but no man page available] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_GSReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. It is built with the help of a packager on fedora forums - I am a packaging novice - and then maintained by me on the fedora forum for about a year] I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years

1
69
0 / 0

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/... there are these new "features": * Use libavutil-provided implementations for CRC, SHA1 and BASE64 algorithms, this makes use of libavutil even outside the FFmpeg decoding plugin, but avoid duplication of algorithms between different plugins. * Use av_mallocz() when xine_xmalloc_aligned() wouldn't be needed. * FFmpeg is now required as an external dependency; if you want to build xine-lib from source, please download a copy of FFmpeg from their SVN server. which basically mean that xine-lib now has a global, non-optional dependency on FFmpeg's libavutil library. So there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. I don't think that's a good idea in the long run, upstream won't be providing security fixes for the old branch forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (I don't think libavutil, as opposed to libavcodec, is actually patent-encumbered, though that'd also have to be checked.) The issue there is that FFmpeg upstream obviously doesn't support this. It would need some more black packaging magic of the kind already done in xine-lib, and more legal auditing. I don't think I want to investigate going down that road. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. Yuck!!! (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go with (d). The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: * gxine * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) * oxine * xine-plugin * xine-ui These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. This means the affected packages are basically *xine*. So my plan is to retire (for my packages, resp. have the respective maintainer retire) the listed packages in Fedora for Fedora ≥ 17 and get (or have the respective maintainer get) them into RPM Fusion Free instead. (I'd take care of xine-lib and kaffeine myself, I hope the maintainers of the other packages will take care of them.) Comments? Objections? Kevin Kofler

11 years, 1 month

5
11
0 / 0

[RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some reason. This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable for it's target usage. I would like to list what would be possible workarounds for this issue. We likely need to build a openssl-freeworld package: - Build a similar package and drop a file in ld.conf.d to make it system wide ? (the freetype-freeworld way) This seems unpractical as we may produce unknown behavior and un-certified code path with others applications. - Build a shared object with another SONAME so packages liked with the freeworld version will not conflict with package linked with the fedora version. (It will eventually be possible to relink the so to the the fedora SONAME manually in a second step). - Build the freeworld version statically. The question to sync the patch between fedora and RPM Fusion VCS is a big question until we move to git, so I hope that progress will be made in this area soon. If not we may experiment an openssl-freeworld to be possibily behind the fedora version. Any thoughts on that ? Nicolas (kwizart).

11 years, 1 month

6
25
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers April 2013