[Bug 2150] New: Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
Bug #: 2150
Summary: Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kmilos(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom.spec
SRPM: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom-6.3.1.8-1.svn222.fc16.src.rpm
A complete OpenCascade - OCAF based CAD framework. Note that this is not the
original SALOME GEOM project but an effort to create a standalone framework
based on the existing one from SALOME project, with the addition of extra
functionality.
This package can not be included in Fedora because it links with the non-free
OCE library.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, however I packaged for Fedora before
(redshift).
rpmlint output:
rpmlint geom*.rpm
geom.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/geom-6.3.1.8/LICENCE.lgpl.txt
geom.src: W: invalid-url Source0: geom-6.3.1.8-svn222.tar.gz
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/quat.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunk.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/node.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/node.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/vector.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/light.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/light.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/io.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/background.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/background.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/quat.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/atmosphere.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/atmosphere.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tcb.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/mesh.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/mesh.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/io.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunk.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tcb.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/matrix.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/matrix.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/types.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/vector.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/material.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/material.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/viewport.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/viewport.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tracks.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/tracks.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/shadow.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/chunktable.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/ease.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/file.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/file.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/camera.h
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/shadow.c
geom-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/geom-6.3.1.8/src/Exchange3DS/lib3ds/camera.c
geom-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 38 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 2804] New: Review Request: jvgs - Minimalistic platform game loosely based on xkcd webcomic
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2804
Bug #: 2804
Summary: Review Request: jvgs - Minimalistic platform game
loosely based on xkcd webcomic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/jvgs.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/jvgs-0.5.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: This game takes place in a world much like ours, which has started
fading away. At a point where nearly everything has gone, a poet
finds himself, alone in a strange world of danger. He starts a journey
along the broken stream of thoughts that's left.
The package is not eligible for fedora because the sound track is
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license;
The Non-Commercial is the problem. It works if stripping the sound
from the installation, but I believe that removes most of the
game experience, and requiring the user to download the sound track
is too much overhead for the user also giving the user could just
enable rpmfusion for other similar content.
Last run of fedora-review on it can be found at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914798#c3
This is still my first attempt of getting a package in rpmfusion.
Previously I cancelled 0ad and nvidia-texture-tools requests
because it ended up being approved for Fedora; some of my first
Fedora contributions...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 2838] New: "Review request: lttng-modules - LTTng 2.x kernel tracer modules"
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2838
Bug #: 2838
Summary: "Review request: lttng-modules - LTTng 2.x kernel
tracer modules"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: yannick.brosseau(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
This is my first packages on RPM Fusion (I'm a fedora packager). They cannot go
in fedora, since they are kernel modules.
SPEC: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/kernel/lttng-modules.spec
SRPM:
http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/kernel/lttng-modules-2.1.2...
%description
The LTTng project aims at providing highly efficient tracing tools for Linux.
Its tracers help tracking down performance issues and debugging problems
involving multiple concurrent processes and threads. Tracing across multiple
systems is also possible.
This package contains the LTTng kernel modules. These provide
the ring buffer library and the kernel tracer itself
rpmlint output:
[scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/lttng-modules.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/scientist/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lttng-modules-2.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/scientist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lttng-modules-2.1.2-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
lttng-modules.x86_64: E: no-binary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM
Fusion
contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug.
SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please
take it off of this list.
Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side)
no need to request for sponsorship.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years
[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351
Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages
needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen...
SRPM URL:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen...
Description:
Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally.
This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console
package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website.
Can't be in Fedora:
- it's a meta package
- it enables use of non fedora software
- the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author.
- the upstream is not open source
- the upstream do not support the fedora distribution
- FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party
apps shall be blocked from Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17
The original Fedora review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007
FESCO item tracking:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35
FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30:
http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/
=====
rpmlint:
vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/lib/security/pam_unix.so
vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6
vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6
vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation
vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary
vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation
vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings.
=====
So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ?
Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does
it attempt to download them.
Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype
etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 1 month