July 2013 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2577] New: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2577 Bug #: 2577 Summary: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: greg.hellings(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos.spec SRPM file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Pithos is a native Pandora Radio client for Linux. It's much more lightweight than the Pandora.com web client, and integrates with desktop features such as media keys, notifications, and the sound menu. Ineligible for Fedora: relies on gstreamer-plugins-bad for codecs which are no provided in gstreamer-plugins-bad-free $ rpmlint results_pithos/20121123/1.fc17/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.*rpm pithos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pithos pithos.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pithos-20121123.tar.xz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. no-manual-page-for-binary pithos --- Ignored because none is provided by upstream invalid-url Source0 --- Ignored because upstream does not make tarball releases This is my first RPM Fusion package. I am a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 1 month

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2803] New: Review request: opencv - Collection of algorithms for computer vision

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2803 Bug #: 2803 Summary: Review request: opencv - Collection of algorithms for computer vision Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC/SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/opencv-rpmfusion/opencv.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/opencv-rpmfusion/opencv-2.4.4-3.fc20.s... Description: OpenCV means Intel® Open Source Computer Vision Library. It is a collection of C functions and a few C++ classes that implement some popular Image Processing and Computer Vision algorithms. fas username: ankursinha (package maintainer) This package includes only the nonfree and gpu shared objects that aren't available in the fedora package. I haven't been able to build the CUDA related stuff yet. It's my first rpmfusion package :) [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm ../SPECS/opencv.spec ./opencv-2.4.4-3.fc19.src.rpm opencv-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Nonfree -> Non free, Non-free, Freon opencv-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nonfree -> non free, non-free, Freon opencv-free.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Nonfree -> Non free, Non-free, Freon opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nonfree -> non free, non-free, Freon opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-nonfree.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-nonfree-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opencvlibrary/OpenCV-2.4.4a.tar.bz2 timed out 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 2 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 3 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2565] New: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565 Bug #: 2565 Summary: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Native linux client for Spotify's streaming music service. Spec: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client.spec Srpm: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client-0.8.4.103.g9cb17... Description: Think of Spotify as your new music collection. Your library. Only this time your collection is vast: millions of tracks and counting. Spotify comes in all shapes and sizes, available for your PC, Mac, home audio system and mobile phone. Wherever you go, your music follows you. And because the music plays live, there’s no need to wait for downloads and no big dent in your hard drive. Why not Fedora: closed source. Section: nonfree (closed source) rpmlint ~/Dropbox/Public/spotify/* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 4 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 2455] New: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455 Bug #: 2455 Summary: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: gbirchley(a)blueyonder.co.uk CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org The SPEC file and SRPM of this package are available at the following URLs (the files are compressed as tarballs to upload to forum)- SRPM: http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39887 SPEC - http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39888 Description: PCSX2 is an open source Playstation 2 emulator. It requires a dump of a real Playstation 2 BIOS, which is not included. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Fedora does not allow emulators The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages: $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm pcsx2.src:23: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag i686 [Comment: needs i686 packages to compile, will run in x86_64] pcsx2.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pcsx2.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1.0/pcsx2-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found [Comment: Compiled from subversion - have included shell script to build a tarball as a source and instructions for in comments] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.i686.rpm pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZCGReplayLoader [Comment:this is a debugging tool as pcsx2 is a WIP. Will help development to include this package, so users can follow debug insructions from developers but no man page available] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_GSReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. It is built with the help of a packager on fedora forums - I am a packaging novice - and then maintained by me on the fedora forum for about a year] I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 4 months

1
69
0 / 0

[Bug 2897] New: Review request: libvdpau-va-gl - VDPAU driver with OpenGL/VAAPI back-end

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2897 Bug #: 2897 Summary: Review request: libvdpau-va-gl - VDPAU driver with OpenGL/VAAPI back-end Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libvdpau-va-gl/libvdpau-va-gl.spec SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libvdpau-va-gl/libvdpau-va-gl-0.1.... Summary: VDPAU driver with OpenGL/VAAPI back-end This package is eligible for the free section because it requires libswscale which is part of ffmpeg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 4 months

1
33
0 / 0

[Bug 2857] New: Review request: xine-lib 1.2 - A multimedia engine

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2857 Bug #: 2857 Summary: Review request: xine-lib 1.2 - A multimedia engine Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org xine-lib is currently stuck at branch 1.1 in Fedora. The current main branch is 1.2, and 1.1 will likely be deprecated by upstream in the not too distant future, and will not receive updates, including security ones, hence it would be wise to move to the 1.2 branch for Fedora 20. Currently, xine-lib is in Fedora, with all the possibly patent encumbered bits split into xine-lib-extras-freeworld in RPM Fusion. However, with xine-lib 1.2 such a split is now longer possible, because ffmpeg is now needed to build xine-lib. According to current xine-lib maintainer there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before xine-lib was needed for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). This package review is for solution d. It merges Fedora's xine-lib spec with RPM Fusion's xine-lib-extras-freeworld. Hopefully, I got everything right, but the changes are big enough it worth having it fully reviewed. Spec : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/xine-lib.spec SRPM : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/xine-lib-1.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

2
20
0 / 0

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/... there are these new "features": * Use libavutil-provided implementations for CRC, SHA1 and BASE64 algorithms, this makes use of libavutil even outside the FFmpeg decoding plugin, but avoid duplication of algorithms between different plugins. * Use av_mallocz() when xine_xmalloc_aligned() wouldn't be needed. * FFmpeg is now required as an external dependency; if you want to build xine-lib from source, please download a copy of FFmpeg from their SVN server. which basically mean that xine-lib now has a global, non-optional dependency on FFmpeg's libavutil library. So there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. I don't think that's a good idea in the long run, upstream won't be providing security fixes for the old branch forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (I don't think libavutil, as opposed to libavcodec, is actually patent-encumbered, though that'd also have to be checked.) The issue there is that FFmpeg upstream obviously doesn't support this. It would need some more black packaging magic of the kind already done in xine-lib, and more legal auditing. I don't think I want to investigate going down that road. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. Yuck!!! (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go with (d). The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: * gxine * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) * oxine * xine-plugin * xine-ui These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. This means the affected packages are basically *xine*. So my plan is to retire (for my packages, resp. have the respective maintainer retire) the listed packages in Fedora for Fedora ≥ 17 and get (or have the respective maintainer get) them into RPM Fusion Free instead. (I'd take care of xine-lib and kaffeine myself, I hope the maintainers of the other packages will take care of them.) Comments? Objections? Kevin Kofler

10 years, 6 months

5
11
0 / 0

[RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some reason. This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable for it's target usage. I would like to list what would be possible workarounds for this issue. We likely need to build a openssl-freeworld package: - Build a similar package and drop a file in ld.conf.d to make it system wide ? (the freetype-freeworld way) This seems unpractical as we may produce unknown behavior and un-certified code path with others applications. - Build a shared object with another SONAME so packages liked with the freeworld version will not conflict with package linked with the fedora version. (It will eventually be possible to relink the so to the the fedora SONAME manually in a second step). - Build the freeworld version statically. The question to sync the patch between fedora and RPM Fusion VCS is a big question until we move to git, so I hope that progress will be made in this area soon. If not we may experiment an openssl-freeworld to be possibily behind the fedora version. Any thoughts on that ? Nicolas (kwizart).

10 years, 6 months

6
25
0 / 0

[Bug 2890] New: Review request: wl-6xx-kmod - Kernel module series 6.xx for Broadcom wireless devices

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890 Bug #: 2890 Summary: Review request: wl-6xx-kmod - Kernel module series 6.xx for Broadcom wireless devices Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC file: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/Rawhide/wl-6xx-kmod... SRPMS file: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/Rawhide/wl-6xx-kmod... Sources URL: https://launchpad.net/~albertomilone/+archive/broadcom/+packages Description: These packages contain Broadcom's IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n hybrid Linux device driver version 6.xx for use with Broadcom's BCM4311-, BCM4312-, BCM4313-, BCM4321-, BCM4322-, BCM43224-, and BCM43225-, BCM43227-, BCM43228-, BCM43142- and BCM4331-based hardware. rpmlint wl-6xx-kmod.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint wl-6xx-kmod-6.30.223.30-1.fc20.src.rpm wl-6xx-kmod.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readme -> reamed, remade, read me 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This package depends on broadcom-wl-6xx package (review request filled at the same time with same comment). This review request obsolete review request #2550. As the maintainer of the actual wl-kmod package for rpmfusion, I had to face some unresolved bug report against the current wl-kmod 5.100.82.112 version (rfbz#2721). The only solution was to provide this new device driver. This driver comes from Ubuntu developer's repository, and is not a Broadcom official wireless device driver, even if it was provided by Broadcom to the Ubuntu team (in a goal of testing I guess). This driver is actually used in recent official Ubuntu distributions. Why proposing a wl-6xx-kmod instead of just "bumping" the actual rpmfusion wl-kmod? Some Ubuntu users with not so old wireless devices had bad experience with the new driver (ie 6.30.223.30 and previous one 6.20) and had to revert to the actual official Broadcom driver (ie 5.100.82.112). So, the two versions have to be available in order to keep user's experience as smoother as possible as described below. Some new wireless devices don't work with the old driver (5.xx series), but with the new one (6.xx series). Some not so old wireless devices works with the old and the new driver (5.xx and 6.xx series - my bcm4313 do for example). Some not so old wireless devices works only with old driver (5.xx series). Last reason to keep two versions of this driver is that it isn't an official Broadcom one. Its status should be considered as "early-alpha" even if this one is functional since April 2013 on some Fedora laptops (see rfbz#2721 or rfbz#2550 for user's feedback). Why offer this driver while the official kernel driver should also work on certain wireless devices? Users want their device to work to highest possible bit rate, want a working LED on their laptop, etc. Thanks in advance for your comments. Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2013