January 2014 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2838] New: "Review request: lttng-modules - LTTng 2.x kernel tracer modules"

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2838 Bug #: 2838 Summary: "Review request: lttng-modules - LTTng 2.x kernel tracer modules" Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: yannick.brosseau(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org This is my first packages on RPM Fusion (I'm a fedora packager). They cannot go in fedora, since they are kernel modules. SPEC: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/kernel/lttng-modules.spec SRPM: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/kernel/lttng-modules-2.1.2... %description The LTTng project aims at providing highly efficient tracing tools for Linux. Its tracers help tracking down performance issues and debugging problems involving multiple concurrent processes and threads. Tracing across multiple systems is also possible. This package contains the LTTng kernel modules. These provide the ring buffer library and the kernel tracer itself rpmlint output: [scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/lttng-modules.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/scientist/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lttng-modules-2.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [scientist@fedora rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/scientist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lttng-modules-2.1.2-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm lttng-modules.x86_64: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2134] New: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2134 Bug #: 2134 Summary: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify-1.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for the official Spotify API Why not in Fedora: Requires libspotify which is proprietary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2135] New: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2135 Bug #: 2135 Summary: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 2133, 2134 Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy-0.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Mopidy is a music server that plays music from a user's Spotify account, given that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Any MPD clients can connect and control the server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM Fusion contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug. SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please take it off of this list. Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side) no need to request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
87
0 / 0

[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. Can't be in Fedora: - it's a meta package - it enables use of non fedora software - the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author. - the upstream is not open source - the upstream do not support the fedora distribution - FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party apps shall be blocked from Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17 The original Fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 FESCO item tracking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35 FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/ ===== rpmlint: vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/pam_unix.so vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. ===== So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does it attempt to download them. Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1971] New: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1971 Summary: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 33 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mp3gain Updated RPMFusion Owners: kvolny I'd like to take care of this orphan (http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-September/...) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1032] New: Review request: idjc - Internet DJ Console

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032 Summary: Review request: idjc - Internet DJ Console Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jsteffan(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/idjc.spec SRPM: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/idjc-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Internet DJ console is a free software application for people wanting to make radio shows on the internet. [...] Needs rpmfusion due to BRs. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/*.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/idjc.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 1 month

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1742] New: Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 Summary: Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: linux.n.pkd(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vo-aacenc.spec SRPM URL: http://prabindatta.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vo-aacenc-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This library contains an encoder implementation of the Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) audio codec. The library is based on a codec implementation by VisualOn as part of the Stagefright framework from the Google Android project. > Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811#c3 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811#c4 > Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package? Yes! > Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored > packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored package? I am already sponsored in fedora. fas name: prabindatta -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
22
0 / 0

[Bug 584] New: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584 Summary: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish-1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish.spec Summary: Squish DXT compression library The package was refused on Fedora according that DXT is patented: http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patsearch.cgi?patnum=US+5956431#show https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407561 This package is elligible for rpmfusion-free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1319] New: Review request:BLCR - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1319 Summary: Review request:BLCR - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: https://ftg.lbl.gov/CheckpointRestart/CheckpointRestart. shtml OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nguyenkims(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 * URLS to spec file and source rpm of BLCR package: http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=de0138956b52366aab1eab3e9fa335ca4bbcee... * Description: Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications. Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority of scientific applications which use MPI for communication on Linux clusters are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code. * Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: This package contains BLCR kernel module so it can not be included in Fedora. * The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. - BLCR-kmod source package: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - BLCR source package: blcr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint blcr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointable -> checkpoint able, checkpoint-able, checkpoint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The first two messages are just spelling problems. - kmod-blcr binary package kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized C blcr kernel module(s) for 2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686 kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr_imports.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: no-documentation kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr_imports.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr.ko 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 4 warnings. The 1st message: I think this is a bug of rpmlint The 2nd & 3rd message: I don't know how to correct it ( but I don't think it is serious) The 4th message: There's no documentation for this module package The 5th-7th errors: Due to fedora politics about modules. - BLCR binary package blcr.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint blcr.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointable -> checkpoint able, checkpoint-able, checkpoint blcr.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/blcr 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The first 2 messages: Spelling problems The 3rd: I suppose that is due to the fact that BLCR is already installed on my machine. * It's my first RPM fusion package * Also, I'm seeking for a sponsor :) (I'm not sponsored packager in fedora) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2014