[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
Bug #: 3335
Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec.
It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple
API makes it easy to integrate it into other software.
The package was rejected for Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC
implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as
previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information.
Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated.
This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and
sponsor it.
rpmlint output for the RPMs:
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> "codec" is just fine for this.
libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
-> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the
package just fine with wget or curl.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
-> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's
fine.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec ->
codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
-> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet.
Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
-----
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
Bug #: 3491
Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from
mp3splt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec
libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on
libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec).
rpmlint output:
libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a
Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes
(http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
Bug #: 2433
Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of
extra plugins for Qmmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr...
Description:
Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora.
* MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library
I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description
... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740
rpmlint output:
[kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months
[Bug 3485] New: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3485
Bug #: 3485
Summary: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://girl.software/
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: oka(a)oka.no
CC: anto.trande(a)gmail.com,
rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://girl.software/girl.spec
SRPM URL: http://girl.software/girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
Description: I am the developer of the GNOME Internet Radio Locator, and would
like to see it included in RPMFusion since some of the included radio stations
depends on the MP3 codec. Girl is a GNOME Internet Radio Locator program that
allows the user to easily find and record live radio programs on radio
broadcasters on the Internet. Girl is developed on the GNOME platform and it
requires at least one audio player such as Totem to be installed for playback
and streamripper for recording. Enjoy Internet Radio.
I think that the rpmlint message below can safely be ignored, since
streamripper is "streamripper" according to "yum info streamripper".
oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
girl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US streamripper -> stream
ripper, stream-ripper, stripper
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings
oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Antonio Trande wrote that he can review the package in RPMFusion
according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161834
Thanks in advance.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months
[Bug 2518] New: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518
Bug #: 2518
Summary: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0...
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0...
Description :
This plugin enables VDR to write compliant DVDs from VDR recordings
while being able to control the process and to watch progress from
inside VDRs on-screen-display. If the selected recordings don't fit
the DVD, the video tracks are requantized (shrinked) automatically.
The created menus support multipage descriptions (in case the
recording summary exceeds one page).
rpmlint output:
rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized ->
quarantined
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked,
shrink ed, shrink-ed
vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage -> multistage
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized ->
quarantined
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked,
shrink ed, shrink-ed
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage ->
multistage
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters/standard
vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn vdr
vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post perl
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
The link exists on a installed package vdr-burn:
ll /etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 41 Oct 7 19:55
/etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf ->
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
The package is a update of the previous vdr-burn for fc17 from
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-17-rpmfusion_free/12218-vdr-bur...
There exists no bug report from vdr-burn so I have created a new bug review.
The package was marked as orphaned
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=free&view=co
Fedora|vdr-burn|DVD writing plugin for VDR|orphaned||
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 years