December 2015 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2997] New: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2997 Bug #: 2997 Summary: Review Request: spinroot - Formal verification of multi-threaded software applications Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexisis-pristontale(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot.spec SRPM: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/spinroot-6.2.5-1.fc18.src.rpm MOCK BUILD LOG: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/build.log ALL OTHER USEFULL STUFF: http://lameire.iiens.net/spinroot/ RPMLINT: spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti spinroot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti spinroot.x86_64: W: invalid-license free use for educational purpose Not eligible on fedora repo : non free app, only redistribuable without money exchange. NB: a "spin" package is already avalable on fedora repo, I rename the package folowing the website domain Description: Spin targets the efficient verification of multi-threaded software, not the verification of hardware circuits. The tool supports a high level language to specify systems descriptions called PROMELA (short for: PROcess MEta LAnguage). Spin has been used to trace logical design errors in distributed systems design, such as operating systems, data communications protocols, switching systems, concurrent algorithms, railway signaling protocols, control software for spacecraft, nuclear power plants, etc. The tool checks the logical consistency of a specification and reports on deadlocks, race conditions, different types of incompleteness, and unwarranted assumptions about the relative speeds of processes. I have no approuved package on rpm-fusion, but I'm already approuved on fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3001] New: Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3001 Bug #: 3001 Summary: Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: chemobejk(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spawned from discussion in bug #2633 ---------------------------------------------------------- SPEC: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1199 FYI: The SRPM will use the same Nvidia blob files as xorg-x11-drv-nvidia. ---------------------------------------------------------- %description This package includes firmware files required for the nouveau kernel driver to activate Video acceleration on certain Nvidia devices. ---------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint SRPMS/nouveau-firmware-325.15-1.fc19.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/nouveau-firmware-325.15-1.fc19.noarch.rpm nouveau-firmware.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Firwmare -> Firmware, Firearm - Oops will fix that of course :-) nouveau-firmware.src: W: file-size-mismatch extract_firmware.py = 11218, https://raw.github.com/imirkin/re-vp2/master/extract_firmware.py = 10692 - I made modifications to this script to enable use in "packaging mode" nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Firwmare -> Firmware, Firearm - see above nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - No idea. The binary package has only firmware files for the kernel, i.e. /usr/lib/firmware/nouveau/* nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: no-documentation - Good point. I guess I could add a README with a URL pointing to the nouveau Video Acceleration page 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------- This is my first RPMFusion package. I'm a Fedora sponsored package though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 3007] New: Review request: gtkradiant-data - Data files for the video games level editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3007 Bug #: 3007 Summary: Review request: gtkradiant-data - Data files for the video games level editor Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: bebo.sudo(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2909 Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant-data/gtkra... SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant-data/F19/S... Description: Data files for the gtkradiant engine. ---- This package is related with bug 2909, because unless this, the gtkradiant package is useless. I split the data in another package to manage it better. The license of these gamepacks are not certain, and this is the main reason I have to file this package in rpmfusion. I only found the quake3 sdk license, which I put in the package, but I'm not able to find the others. If you have any suggestion please share with me. Thanks, Alberto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 3036] New: Review request: RBDoom3BFG - Robert Beckebans' Doom 3 BFG engine

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3036 Bug #: 3036 Summary: Review request: RBDoom3BFG - Robert Beckebans' Doom 3 BFG engine Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/RBDoom3BFG.spec SRPM: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-11.gitaaed5dd0.fc19.sr... RBDoom3BFG 3 is a Doom 3 BFG GPL source modification. The goal of RBDoom3BFG 3 is to bring Doom 3 BFG with the help of SDL to all suitable platforms. Bugs present in the original DOOM 3 will be fixed (when identified) without altering the original game-play. Why it's not in Fedora? Packaging guidelines prohibit engines where the content is not available. The engine is fully Open Source. Note: Information on the package and on the game content is inside the README.txt file. $ rpmlint RBDoom3BFG*rpm RBDoom3BFG.src: W: strange-permission RBDoom3BFG-git-checkout.sh 0751L RBDoom3BFG.src: W: invalid-url Source0: RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-gitaaed5dd0.tar.bz2 RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libidlib.so libidlib.so RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/RBDoom3BFG-1.1400/COPYING.txt RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary RBDoom3BFG 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. > RBDoom3BFG.src: W: strange-permission RBDoom3BFG-git-checkout.sh 0751L > RBDoom3BFG.src: W: invalid-url Source0: RBDoom3BFG-1.1400-gitaaed5dd0.tar.bz2 Script used to generate the Source0 main file. This is legitimate in Fedora packaging guidelines. > RBDoom3BFG.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libidlib.so libidlib.so This is the main engine code, it is dynamically loaded at runtime from the ld.so path; default compilation from upstream sources loads it through RPATH. The game it's looking for that specific name, much like a plugin. There's no need to run ldconfig in %post/%postun. The rest can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 3900] New: Review Request: tivolibre - Java app and library for decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3900 Bug #: 3900 Summary: Review Request: tivolibre - Java app and library for decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: orion(a)cora.nwra.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Java app and library for decoding TiVo files to standard MPEG files. Spec file: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/rpmfusion/tivolibre.spec SRPM file: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/rpmfusion/tivolibre-0.7.2-1.fc23.src.rpm This contains an implementation of the Qualcomm Touring family of encryption algorithms and has the following restriction: # 5. The Turing family of encryption algorithms are covered by patents in # the United States of America and other countries. A free and # irrevocable license is hereby granted for the use of such patents to # the extent required to utilize the Turing family of encryption # algorithms for any purpose, subject to the condition that any # commercial product utilising any of the Turing family of encryption # algorithms should show the words "Encryption by QUALCOMM" either on the # product or in the associated documentation. and hence should be considered nonfree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3863] New: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863 Bug #: 3863 Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data. . game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data). Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others. http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/ ------------- http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool... The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release, so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release. These are built this way: git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master > ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz Which makes rmplint complain: "game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz" ------------- This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's free software, but of no use without non-free assets; likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 : "game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself." --------------------------- remaining rpmlint: game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror lists. either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time, or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't much matter. http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager that's not a script intended to be run, but a script fragement to be sourced game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too ----- This is my first RPM Fusion package. ------- upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule; having this would allow to trim the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 2929] New: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 Bug #: 2929 Summary: Review Request: smtube - A Youtube browser that can play and download Youtube videos Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cickumqt(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://cicku.me/smtube.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/smtube-1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: SMTube is a Youtube browser which allows to search, play and download Youtube videos. This project is based on some code from UMPlayer. Reason for not in Fedora: It needs smplayer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 Bug #: 3576 Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software. I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in Fedora. OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think that all of these errors are related to this. rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 8 months

1
51
0 / 0

[Bug 3111] New: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 Bug #: 3111 Summary: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Description: PPSSPP is a playstation portable emulator Why not in fedora: emulators are not allowed. SPEC:https://www.dropbox.com/s/likw80h5k1yqigp/ppsspp.spec SRPM:https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmaz75mm4hauacf/ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga1... also I've made a bash script which makes latest rpm from git snapshot rpms:https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ziwo5e49emml6j/make-ppsspp-rpm-from-git.sh rpmlint output: bash-4.2$ rpmlint ppsspp.spec ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga113abd.fc20.src.rpm ppsspp.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz ppsspp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Playstation -> PlayStation, Play station, Play-station ppsspp.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url URL ppsspp.org ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission make-ppsspp-from-git.sh 0755L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.spec 0640L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.png 0755L ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 3255] New: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3255 Bug #: 3255 Summary: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwrobel(a)ertelnet.rybnik.pl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/ldoce5viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ldoce5viewer-2014... Description: The ldoce5viewer is an alternative dictionary viewer for the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English 5th Edition (LDOCE 5). Fedora Account System Username: dwrobel According to the packaging guidelines [1] packages which are not useful without external bits are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. This is my first package for RPM Fusion. $ rpmlint ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.src.rpm ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ldoce5viewer.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldoce5viewer 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Manual page is optional. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers December 2015