February 2015 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 Bug #: 3335 Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec. It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple API makes it easy to integrate it into other software. The package was rejected for Fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information. Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated. This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and sponsor it. rpmlint output for the RPMs: ----- $ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> "codec" is just fine for this. libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0.... HTTP Error 403: Forbidden The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. -> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the package just fine with wget or curl. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's fine. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. -> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet. Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
55
0 / 0

[Bug 3492] New: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 Bug #: 3492 Summary: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org mp3splt - the command line program from the mp3splt-project http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-2.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt.spec mp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: mp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 Bug #: 3491 Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 Bug #: 2433 Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr... Description: Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora. * MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description ... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 rpmlint output: [kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 10 months

2
26
0 / 0

[Bug 2736] New: Review Request: fdk-aac - Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2736 Bug #: 2736 Summary: Review Request: fdk-aac - Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/fdk-aac/fdk-aac.spec SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/fdk-aac/fdk-aac-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Summary: Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library This library implement the AAC codec which is covered by several patents. Hence this make it eligible to the RPM Fusion free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 10 months

2
26
0 / 0

[Bug 3485] New: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3485 Bug #: 3485 Summary: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://girl.software/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: oka(a)oka.no CC: anto.trande(a)gmail.com, rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://girl.software/girl.spec SRPM URL: http://girl.software/girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: I am the developer of the GNOME Internet Radio Locator, and would like to see it included in RPMFusion since some of the included radio stations depends on the MP3 codec. Girl is a GNOME Internet Radio Locator program that allows the user to easily find and record live radio programs on radio broadcasters on the Internet. Girl is developed on the GNOME platform and it requires at least one audio player such as Totem to be installed for playback and streamripper for recording. Enjoy Internet Radio. I think that the rpmlint message below can safely be ignored, since streamripper is "streamripper" according to "yum info streamripper". oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm girl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US streamripper -> stream ripper, stream-ripper, stripper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Antonio Trande wrote that he can review the package in RPMFusion according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161834 Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 11 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3085] New: Review Request: Mutiara - Motif Designer

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3085 Bug #: 3085 Summary: Review Request: Mutiara - Motif Designer Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://mutiara.sourceforge.net/ Description: Mutiara is a border motif designer with an interesting twist. Even non-artists can easily design pleasing motifs. SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fivlzvzaohxkdc8/mutiara.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kg3jskfq2rr1ked/mutiara-0.11.1-1.fc20.src.rpm rpmlint mutiara.spec /home/rizvan/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mutiara-0.11.1-1.fc20.src.rpm /home/rizvan/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mutiara-0.11.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm /home/rizvan/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mutiara-debuginfo-0.11.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm mutiara.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mutiara.src: W: strange-permission mutiara-0.11.1.tar.bz2 0600L mutiara.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mutiara.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mutiara mutiara-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 11 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2518] New: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2518 Bug #: 2518 Summary: vdr-burn - DVD writing plugin for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0... SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-burn/vdr-burn-0.2.0... Description : This plugin enables VDR to write compliant DVDs from VDR recordings while being able to control the process and to watch progress from inside VDRs on-screen-display. If the selected recordings don't fit the DVD, the video tracks are requantized (shrinked) automatically. The created menus support multipage descriptions (in case the recording summary exceeds one page). rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized -> quarantined vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked, shrink ed, shrink-ed vdr-burn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage -> multistage 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. rpmlint vdr-burn-0.2.0-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US requantized -> quarantined vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shrinked -> shrieked, shrink ed, shrink-ed vdr-burn.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multipage -> multistage vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters/standard vdr vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn/counters vdr vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf vdr-burn.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/burn vdr vdr-burn.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post perl 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. The link exists on a installed package vdr-burn: ll /etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 41 Oct 7 19:55 /etc/vdr/plugins/burn/fonts/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf -> /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuLGCSans.ttf The package is a update of the previous vdr-burn for fc17 from http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-17-rpmfusion_free/12218-vdr-bur... There exists no bug report from vdr-burn so I have created a new bug review. The package was marked as orphaned http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=free&view=co Fedora|vdr-burn|DVD writing plugin for VDR|orphaned|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 11 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 3290] New: Review request: libopenshot1 - Library for creating and editing videos

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3290 Bug #: 3290 Summary: Review request: libopenshot1 - Library for creating and editing videos Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jonathan(a)openshot.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 OpenShot Library (libopenshot) is an open-source project dedicated to delivering high quality video editing, animation, and playback solutions to the world. For more information visit <http://www.openshot.org/>. SPEC and SRPM Files: https://launchpad.net/libopenshot/0.0/0.0.2/+download/libopenshot.spec https://launchpad.net/libopenshot/0.0/0.0.2/+download/libopenshot1-0.0.2-... This package is not eligible for Fedora due to FFmpeg and LibAV dependencies. This (and libopenshot-audio) are my first 2 packages to submit to RPM Fusion. I am seeking a sponsor for this package and also libopenshot-audio (filed in another bug report). I am also the lead developer of OpenShot Video Editor, and am looking forward to having libopenshot and libopenshot-audio available in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 4 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 2733] New: Review Request: xpra-codecs-freeworld - Additional codecs for xpra

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2733 Bug #: 2733 Summary: Review Request: xpra-codecs-freeworld - Additional codecs for xpra Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-codecs-freeworld.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.8.8-2.fc18.src.rpm FAS Username: patches Description: Provides support for H.264 AVC and WebM in xpra. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 6 months

1
21
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2015