[Bug 3438] New: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and converter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3438
Bug #: 3438
Summary: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and
converter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/clipgrab.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: ClipGrab is a free downloader and converter for YouTube, Vimeo,
Dailymotion and many other online video sites.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded,
down loader, down-loader
clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader ->
downloaded, down loader, down-loader
clipgrab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary clipgrab
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down
loader, down-loader
clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader -> downloaded,
down loader, down-loader
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
%changelog
* Sat Dec 06 2014 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 3.4.8-1
- rebuild for new version
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
Bug #: 3429
Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads
games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.sr...
Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of
tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive
Fiction".
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3)
Rpmlint:
frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob
frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
Bug #: 3335
Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec.
It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple
API makes it easy to integrate it into other software.
The package was rejected for Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC
implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as
previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information.
Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated.
This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and
sponsor it.
rpmlint output for the RPMs:
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> "codec" is just fine for this.
libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
-> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the
package just fine with wget or curl.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
-> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's
fine.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec ->
codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
-> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet.
Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
-----
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
Bug #: 3491
Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from
mp3splt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec
libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on
libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec).
rpmlint output:
libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a
Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes
(http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
Bug #: 2433
Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of
extra plugins for Qmmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr...
Description:
Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora.
* MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library
I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description
... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740
rpmlint output:
[kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months
[Bug 3485] New: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3485
Bug #: 3485
Summary: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://girl.software/
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: oka(a)oka.no
CC: anto.trande(a)gmail.com,
rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://girl.software/girl.spec
SRPM URL: http://girl.software/girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
Description: I am the developer of the GNOME Internet Radio Locator, and would
like to see it included in RPMFusion since some of the included radio stations
depends on the MP3 codec. Girl is a GNOME Internet Radio Locator program that
allows the user to easily find and record live radio programs on radio
broadcasters on the Internet. Girl is developed on the GNOME platform and it
requires at least one audio player such as Totem to be installed for playback
and streamripper for recording. Enjoy Internet Radio.
I think that the rpmlint message below can safely be ignored, since
streamripper is "streamripper" according to "yum info streamripper".
oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
girl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US streamripper -> stream
ripper, stream-ripper, stripper
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings
oka@linux:~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint girl-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Antonio Trande wrote that he can review the package in RPMFusion
according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161834
Thanks in advance.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 11 months