July 2015 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3717] New: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 Bug #: 3717 Summary: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform-1... Description: Kodi platform support library. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 2855] New: Flowblade

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Bug #: 2855 Summary: Flowblade Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux released under GPL 3 license. Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible editing experience. Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips. Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites unless correct work flow is followed. spec file: ---------- http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 1 month

1
36
0 / 0

[Bug 3694] New: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 Bug #: 3694 Summary: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69... Description: Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux released under GPL 3 license. Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible editing experience. Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips. Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites unless correct work flow is followed. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package belongs to rpmfusion, because it uses streamripper and GStreamer-plugins (which are not in Fedora) to decode audio. rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.noarch.rpm flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multiracial flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time line, time-line, timeliness flowblade.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.src.rpm flowblade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multiracial flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time line, time-line, timeliness flowblade.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/mime/packages/flowblade 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 1 month

1
33
0 / 0

[Bug 2681] New: akmods for EL6

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2681 Bug #: 2681 Summary: akmods for EL6 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jcpunk(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org May I request the akmods package be built for EL6? It seems like an excellent alternative to DKMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 3176] New: Review Request: mscore-tahoma-fonts - Microsoft core Tahoma fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176 Bug #: 3176 Summary: Review Request: mscore-tahoma-fonts - Microsoft core Tahoma fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org TTF Tahoma fonts that was distributed by Microsoft as part of the Word Reader package having sort of a "free" license. Nowadays available from the Sourceforge mscorefonts2 project. These fonts are not redistributable, hence the lpf wrapper. spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-tahoma-fo... srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-tahoma-fo... target spec and srpm in: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1 Rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target packages besides spelling errors and the target package license. Since this is about building a non-free package this should go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3177] New: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3177 Bug #: 3177 Summary: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org TrueType core fonts for the web that prior to 2002 was available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ , updated in the European Union Expansion Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. The Tahoma font (often distributed with the fonts in this package) is in a separate package mscore-tahoma-fonts due to different license terms. --- spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts-2.2-1.fc20... Target spec and srpmat: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/ These fonts are not redistributable, hence the lpf wrapper. rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This is about building a non-free package, so this should go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3178] New: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178 Bug #: 3178 Summary: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Cleartype fonts made available to the public in the PowerPoint Viewer package around 2006. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-... target spec and srpm in: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1 rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This lpf package builds a non-free target and should thus go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3601] New: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 Bug #: 3601 Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org - spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec - src rpm: https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src... - descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages): Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications. - why not in Fedora: Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9 - is this my first rpmfusion package no, I've already filed another package: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 - am I seeking a sponsor: no, I am Fedora sponsored packager - rpmlint on src rpm: spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > this is why Fedora don't accept the package spread.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz > source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form - rpmlint on rpms: spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > -devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned .so in -libs spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 > let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2421] New: booh - Static web-album generator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2421 Bug #: 2421 Summary: booh - Static web-album generator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh-0.9.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Yet another Web-Album generator. Highlights: * automatic rotation of portrait images thanks to information put by digital camera in .jpg file (EXIF) * immediate display of images (preloading in browser) * keep position of "next/previous" hyperlinks in browser between images * full video support (including thumbnailing) * clever use of the whole space of a typical browser window (the need to scroll portrait images is stupid) * themability * sub-albums support * remember your preferred size of thumbnails accross sub-albums * multi-processor support to speed up thumbnails generation * smooth integration of panoramic images in thumbnails pages * multi-languages web-album navigation (navigation links are automatically shown in user's language) * a GUI to input captions, rotate, reorder and remove images FAST (extensive use of keyboard shortcuts) * another GUI to classify photos and videos in a powerful manner Hello, this a new package for rpmfusion-free repository Have a nice day -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2677] New: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677 Bug #: 2677 Summary: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nanopqr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Address of spec file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm address of source rpm file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar.spec About al-anvar: Al-Anvar is a cross-platform Quran Study Software. It uses "Tanzil.net" and "Zekr.org" database as its database, It has lots of features: - Text of the Quran - Adding different translations of the Quran - Adding interpretation of the Quran - ... I didn't try to put this package in fedora, but one of guys said that religious software couldn't be in fedora. Output of rpmlint: $rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.i686.rpm al-anvar.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra, sure al-anvar.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/al-anvar-0.5.0/README al-anvar.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary al-anvar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm al-anvar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra, sure 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. "sura" is the name of each part of Quran, I don't know why it isn't in spell checker. This is my first rpm in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2015