FAS fully migrated to new version and URL
by Nicolas Chauvet
With the migration from older URL to admin.rpmfusion.org/accounts we
had an issue with new users accounts.
This is now fixed and old URL is disabled, there is still a need to
build rpmfusion-packager for the new fas. So I hope someelse to pick
the tasks so I can continue with my long list.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 2444] Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Stuart Gathman <stuart(a)gathman.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |33
--- Comment #27 from Stuart Gathman <stuart(a)gathman.org> ---
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: mp3fs
Short Description: FUSE filesystem to transcode FLAC to MP3 on the fly
Owners: sdgathman
Branches: master, fc25, fc24, fc23, el7, el6
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
yet anothers things to do: Appstream, comps and remix
by Sérgio Basto
Hello,
Adam Williamson wrote today in reply of one question (made by me) :
"Hmm, actually, maybe it currently doesn't, but it definitely has
before:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/20/x86_64/co
mps.xml
But basically, any repo can have comps data and dnf will respect it;
you can set up an external repo with comps data that lists some package
from that repo as being in the `standard` group, for instance, and when
it installs the `standard` group, dnf will include that package. AFAIK
this has always been intended to work. I'm not sure how often it gets
tested. "
Goggled and found http://rpmfusion.org/comps , so maybe we should add
rpmfusion-comps repo (to archive) , in
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-comps/
like fedora-comps , btw comps was talked here in rpmfusion in 2007 [1]
, and if we need generate comps.xml , we also may talk in Appstream ,
we need generate something isn't it ? And since remxis depends on
comps.xml (If I am correct), also talk about RPMFusion remixs, not
propose generate the remixs , but at least update remix specs [2], and
be able do remix in a local machine .
About appstream [3], can I add/update the missing packages for Fedora
23 ? and close the review request after that?
Cheers,
[1]
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2007-October/
000042.html
[2]
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/?q=remix
[3]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658
--
Sérgio M. B.
8 years, 1 month