March 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4013] New: Review request: devedeng - A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 Bug #: 4013 Summary: Review request: devedeng - A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/devedeng.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/devedeng-4.6.1.tar.gz Description: DevedeNG is a program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD), suitable for home players, from any number of video files, in any of the formats supported by FFMpeg. The suffix NG is because it is a rewrite from scratch of the old Devede, to work with Python3 and Gtk3, and with a new internal architecture that allows to expand it and easily add new features. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora? It depends on other packages in RPM Fusion. Rpmlint: $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/devedeng-4.6.1-1.fc23.src.rpm devedeng.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sVCD -> scud devedeng.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sVCD -> scud devedeng.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US suitables -> suitable, suitable s, suitably 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/devedeng-4.6.1-1.fc23.noarch.rpm devedeng.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-urllib3 devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sVCD -> scud devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sVCD -> scud devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US suitables -> suitable, suitable s, suitably devedeng.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary devede_ng.py devedeng.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary copy_files_verbose.py 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. The "explicit-lib-dependency" error is erroneously raised by rpmlint because it the package name has lib in its name. Warnings can be safely ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3985] New: Review request: kisslicer - Keep It Simple Slicer

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3985 Bug #: 3985 Summary: Review request: kisslicer - Keep It Simple Slicer Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mhroncok(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kisslicer.spec SRPM: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kisslicer-1.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm %description KISSlicer is a fast, easy-to-use, cross-platform program that takes 3D files (STL) and generates path information (G-code) for a 3D Printer. This FREE version has all the features needed for the hobbyist who uses a single-head machine. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: nonfree The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it: > kisslicer.x86_64: W: invalid-license Redistributable valid in nonfree > kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-documentation upstream provides none > kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary KISSlicer > kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kisslicer upstream provides none, also a GUI so not really needed > kisslicer.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable valid in nonfree 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Bug 3740] New: Review request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" non-free plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Bug #: 3740 Summary: Review request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" non-free plug-ins Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree.spec SRPM: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree-1.4.5-1.fc19.sr... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements which operate on media data. This package contains plug-ins that depend on libraries which use a non-free license. This package is not eligible for Fedora because it depends on packages from rpmfusion-nonfree. gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The rpmlint error can be ignored as it is in an automatically generated sub-package. I'm already a rpmfusion packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429 Bug #: 3429 Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.sr... Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive Fiction". Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3) Rpmlint: frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++) frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman) frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also in other packages) no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 3493] New: Review request: mp3splt - GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3493 Bug #: 3493 Summary: Review request: mp3splt - GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org mp3splt-gtk - a GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-gtk-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-gtk.spec mp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: mp3splt-gtk.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-gtk.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-gtk-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 Bug #: 3335 Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec. It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple API makes it easy to integrate it into other software. The package was rejected for Fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information. Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated. This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and sponsor it. rpmlint output for the RPMs: ----- $ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> "codec" is just fine for this. libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0.... HTTP Error 403: Forbidden The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. -> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the package just fine with wget or curl. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's fine. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. -> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet. Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 5 months

1
55
0 / 0

[Bug 3492] New: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 Bug #: 3492 Summary: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org mp3splt - the command line program from the mp3splt-project http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-2.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt.spec mp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: mp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 5 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 Bug #: 3491 Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 5 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 3688] New: Review request: vdr-mpv - A mpv player plugin for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3688 Bug #: 3688 Summary: Review request: vdr-mpv - A mpv player plugin for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-mpv.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-mpv-0.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Description:A mpv player plugin for VDR forked from vdr-play Fedora Account System Username: martinkg this package belongs to rpmfusion, due mpv dependencies. # rpmlint vdr-mpv-0.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm vdr-mpv.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-mpv HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # rpmlint vdr-mpv-debuginfo-0.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm vdr-mpv-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-mpv HTTP Error 404: Not Found vdr-mpv-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mpv-0.0.2/player.h vdr-mpv-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mpv-0.0.2/mpv.cpp vdr-mpv-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mpv-0.0.2/player.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. # rpmlint vdr-mpv-0.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm vdr-mpv.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-mpv HTTP Error 404: Not Found vdr-mpv.src: W: invalid-url Source0: vdr-mpv-0.0.2.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. %changelog * Tue Jun 09 2015 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.0.2-1 - initial build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 5 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 3647] New: Review request: zboy - A GameBoy emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3647 Bug #: 3647 Summary: Review request: zboy - A GameBoy emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/zboy.spec https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.src... Description: zBoy is a multiplatform GameBoy emulator that provides a load/save feature, can perform PCX screenshots either manually or automatically (every few seconds) and emulates an internal battery for ROMs that were designed to use one (this allows to use the internal save option provided by such games, remember highest scores, etc). zBoy supports some additional features, too, like intelligent saving of hi-scores for some games that aren't able to save their hi-scores table by themselves because of the lack of a battery-backed RAM on the cartridge, and improving screen's resolution output using graphic algorithms like Scale2x, Scale3x, eagle... It is also one of the very few GameBoy emulators that provides a 2-gameboys link emulation, which makes it possible to play some games in 2-players mode on a LAN. Why not in Fedora: Emulators are not allowed in Fedora Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.src.rpm zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplatform -> multiform, formulation, formulator zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameboys -> game boys, game-boys, homeboys zboy.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer zboy.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/zboy/zboy-0.60.tar.gz timed out 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplatform -> multiform, formulation, formulator zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameboys -> game boys, game-boys, homeboys zboy.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer zboy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zboy 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/zboy-debuginfo-0.60-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm zboy-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. AFAIK spelling is correct and URLs are correct too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 5 months

1
10
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers March 2016