April 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954 Bug #: 3954 Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise. Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora: nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included in RPM Fusion. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint nordlicht.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel] nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for several years (FAS: ngompa). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 1 month

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3111] New: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 Bug #: 3111 Summary: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Description: PPSSPP is a playstation portable emulator Why not in fedora: emulators are not allowed. SPEC:https://www.dropbox.com/s/likw80h5k1yqigp/ppsspp.spec SRPM:https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmaz75mm4hauacf/ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga1... also I've made a bash script which makes latest rpm from git snapshot rpms:https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ziwo5e49emml6j/make-ppsspp-rpm-from-git.sh rpmlint output: bash-4.2$ rpmlint ppsspp.spec ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga113abd.fc20.src.rpm ppsspp.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.spec:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz ppsspp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Playstation -> PlayStation, Play station, Play-station ppsspp.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games ppsspp.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url URL ppsspp.org ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission make-ppsspp-from-git.sh 0755L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.spec 0640L ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.png 0755L ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ppsspp.src:55: W: setup-not-quiet ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 4019] New: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar - GNOME Shell Extension TaskBar

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4019 Bug #: 4019 Summary: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar - GNOME Shell Extension TaskBar Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zpydr(a)openmailbox.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org spec file URL: https://github.com/zpydr/gnome-shell-extension-taskbar-rpm/blob/master/gn... source rpm URL: https://github.com/zpydr/gnome-shell-extension-taskbar-rpm/blob/master/gn... Description: TaskBar displays icons of running applications on the top panel. rpmlint output spec file: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint output source rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package and I am seeking a sponsor. https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/584/taskbar/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3255] New: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3255 Bug #: 3255 Summary: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwrobel(a)ertelnet.rybnik.pl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/ldoce5viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ldoce5viewer-2014... Description: The ldoce5viewer is an alternative dictionary viewer for the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English 5th Edition (LDOCE 5). Fedora Account System Username: dwrobel According to the packaging guidelines [1] packages which are not useful without external bits are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. This is my first package for RPM Fusion. $ rpmlint ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.src.rpm ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ldoce5viewer.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldoce5viewer 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Manual page is optional. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2222] New: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222 Bug #: 2222 Summary: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp-0.0.2-0.1.20111219giteb97a6... Description: The libactp (Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library) is an implementation of the GPL'ed algorithm demonstrated in FreeSteel as a set of C library functions Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: "Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only [...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora"[1] Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume the term "not useful" applies here. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines rpmlint output: SPECS/libactp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 libactp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball. Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2363] New: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 Bug #: 2363 Summary: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedora(a)marionline.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec SRPMS: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.bui... Description: Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo! and many other useful features. Why here: This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream use ffmpeg library. Rpmlint: jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository. This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for another SIP software, homer: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 3749] New: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 Bug #: 3749 Summary: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... Description: Kodi frontend for MythTV (up to MythTV 0.28). Supports streaming of live TV & recordings, listening to radio channels, EPG and timers. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 3717] New: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 Bug #: 3717 Summary: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform-1... Description: Kodi platform support library. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 4029] New: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4029 Bug #: 4029 Summary: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 4027 Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Description: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora? It depends on FS-UAE. rpmlint output: [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-documentation fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-arcade fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/utf-8.zip fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/iso-8859-1.zip 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 3747] New: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple - Kodi's IPTV Simple client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747 Bug #: 3747 Summary: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple - Kodi's IPTV Simple client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple/kodi-pvr-... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple/kodi-pvr-... Description: Kodi PVR addon for IPTV support, with M3U playlists, streaming of live TV for multicast/unicast sources, listening to radio channels and EPG. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years

3
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers April 2016