May 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3827] New: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3827 Bug #: 3827 Summary: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Description: RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git. SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg.spec SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc... $ rpmlint rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rfpkg-rpmfusion-free-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm rfpkg-rpmfusion-free.noarch: W: no-documentation rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree.noarch: W: no-documentation rfpkg.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/rfpkg/COPYING 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Notes: I don't know if this package must be packaged in EPEL5 too; impossible for missing packages (pyrpkg). It can be built in Fedora and EPEL6. I added same Requires package from fedpkg, since rfpkg is a fork project; unsure if it's correct. bash-completion file seems automatically installed in datadir in Fedora 23, in /etc/bash_completion.d in Fedora 24 and EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 3762] New: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3762 Bug #: 3762 Summary: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.0.0-3git20150901.fc22.src.rpm Description: This is a work-in-progress implementation of the vendor-neutral dispatch layer for arbitrating OpenGL API calls between multiple vendors on a per-screen basis, as described by Andy Ritger's OpenGL ABI proposal. Currently, only the GLX window-system API and OpenGL are supported, but in the future this library may support EGL and OpenGL ES as well. Fedora Account System Username: kwizart This package is currently only supported on x86_64 i386 and armhfp This package has been submitted for fedora, specially as it might be used by mesa at some point. Until approved or if there is any other issue preventing, it will better makes senses in the nonfree section instead of the free section. This package is currenly usefull for the nvidia nonfree driver in optimus setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3687] New: AMD Catalyst 15.101 for Fedora 22 with X.Org X11 Server 1.16

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3687 Bug #: 3687 Summary: AMD Catalyst 15.101 for Fedora 22 with X.Org X11 Server 1.16 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hx(a)inbox.lv CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Here is full description of patches that needs to be applied: https://bluehatrecord.wordpress.com/2015/06/05/installing-the-proprietary... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
22
0 / 0

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 --- Comment #75 from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org(a)bfccomputing.com> 2016-05-31 22:39:58 CEST --- > What you mean by "Rebuilt via rpmbuild from 20160529 / 0841ef5 " ? I built it successfully using rpmbuild (which failed on me last time due to the XML::Parser problem). It was the 20160529 tarball, corresponding to git 0841ef5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 --- Comment #74 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2016-05-29 22:46:11 CEST --- (In reply to comment #73) > > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is > > required for intltool > > I tracked this down to an ancient version of XML::Parser hiding in /usr/local. > Rebuilt via rpmbuild from 20160529 / 0841ef5 and it builds and launches fine > now. What you mean by "Rebuilt via rpmbuild from 20160529 / 0841ef5 " ? > It would be great to get this in the repo - thanks for packaging! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 --- Comment #73 from Bill McGonigle <bill-bugzilla.rpmfusion.org(a)bfccomputing.com> 2016-05-29 20:07:15 CEST --- > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is > required for intltool I tracked this down to an ancient version of XML::Parser hiding in /usr/local. Rebuilt via rpmbuild from 20160529 / 0841ef5 and it builds and launches fine now. It would be great to get this in the repo - thanks for packaging! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[ANNOUNCE] New infra has rised up (finally)

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi RPM Fusion developpers As some of you are aware, out of the mud, a the new shini infrastructure has rised up! There is a new koji instance and a git repository living at: http://koji.rpmfusion.org http://pkgs.rpmfusion.org (even with let's encrypt certificate). This morning, I was able to restore the git hook to sync to github (remember that github is a read only mirror). Most packages from the free section are branched for f23 ( there is a need to understand why a minor portion has failed and need to be repaired), so devel branch is currently f24. Contributors still cannot push until pkgdb2 is setup, so for now the priority is for packages that fail to build in f24, you can submit a github pull request or open a bugzilla. There are lot of tasks remaing to have the new infra fully working, mainly: - rfpkg (http://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rfpkg ) - pkgdb2 - ipsilon - bodhi - fedmsg If you want to help, you need to dive into the code of theses projects, setup your test own instance locally and submit patch upstream to adapt to our needs. Also some theme adaption would be welcomed. If you want to pick a task, please mention it there and keep us informed from your improvements. Please try to avoid asking what you can do, please do something (have a look on https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023) Also to mention is that the new infra is ansible managed (old services are still using puppet), the public part is located here: https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/ansible-rpmfusion That's for thoses who wondered how to help, here what you "could" have done. Reviewing is welcomed. >From my side, there are lot more actions that I cannot list here, so any help is appreciated. Hopefully, next year I will have a day off! Last word to mention, some project started as a replacement for RPM Fusion. While it's probably a good opportunity to learn how to start a self repository / project, I just remind that it will also put Fedora users into a conflicting situation where packages from one repo will behave badly with packages from others repos. (missing options, subpackage, etc). So I really hope theses new repositories will find their way to our community repository. Thx PS: I have some issue with gmail email rate limitations, if you want an info from me, please drop by #rpmfusion on IRC freenodes. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 11 months

6
5
0 / 0

Where to push f23 rpmfusion pkg updates ?

by Hans de Goede

Hi All, I'm working on updating the gstreamer1* pkgs for f23 to 1.6.4, should I push the resulting changes to pkgs.kwizart.net as before (and send a mail to request a build), or should I send a github pull-req as done for f24? Regards, Hans

7 years, 11 months

3
2
0 / 0

[Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Frederic Germain <frederic.germain(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frederic.germain(a)gmail.com --- Comment #56 from Frederic Germain <frederic.germain(a)gmail.com> 2016-05-21 14:41:06 CEST --- I wanted to test the video editor in blender, and find out it would need to be compiled with the ffmpeg option, hence this freeworld package to use it. I'm not a experienced fedora maintainter, but just to let you know the tests I did with the latest blender blender-2.76-1.fc23.src.rpm So I just changed " -DWITH_CODEC_FFMPEG:BOOL=ON " in blender.spec, probably depends on ffmpeg-devel I already had installed, and then it compiles & I can import vids. Only /usr/bin/blender is slightly bigger (49382816 vs 49291104) and blender manpage documents the "--debug-ffmpeg" option. I saw this thread after my tests. Jochen Schmitt are not available anymore on his server, and I don't really understand all that talking is about. I'd just say just do a blender-freeworld package with ffmpeg flag, incomptatible with fedora-update blender package, but I've used ubuntu too much probably and don't grasp rpmfusion policy too much. Let me know if I can help having this package released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4053] New: new build for kmod-wl for fedora 24

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4053 Bug #: 4053 Summary: new build for kmod-wl for fedora 24 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dexter(a)beetjevreemd.nl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 1573 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1573 The SRPM containing the things Created a new build for the wlan package for broadcom chipsets. Little patch from https://github.com/cstrahan/nixpkgs/commit/cb65fb956802f7d591abaaf25a157b... added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2016