January 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2363] New: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 Bug #: 2363 Summary: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedora(a)marionline.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec SRPMS: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.bui... Description: Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo! and many other useful features. Why here: This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream use ffmpeg library. Rpmlint: jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository. This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for another SIP software, homer: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

nVidia howto question or solution

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, After on IRC another fellow, had problems on install nVidia drives on first installation and reboot, I also had a similar problem that make me think. And I think I found the issue, instead try blacklist nouveau on boot we should run: dracut -f /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia package have blacklist-nouveau.conf [1] but just install a new kernel nouveau enter in blacklist isn't it ? , so after installing nVidia drives (for the first time) we should also run dracut to generate initramfs without nouveau module isn't it ? anyway like blacklist-nouveau.conf text says. Conclusion we should/need update https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia Best regards, [1] https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.git/tree/bl acklist-nouveau.conf -- Sérgio M. B.

6 years, 9 months

4
5
0 / 0

[Bug 4441] New: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 Bug ID: 4441 Summary: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: seancallaway(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord.spec SRPM URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord-0.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm DESCRIPTION: Discord is a free-of-cost proprietary VoIP application designed for gaming communities. WHY NOT IN FEDORA? Discord is a proprietary application *and* relies on nonfree libraries (such as ffmpeg), which the developer has bundled into the application. RPMLINT OUTPUT (SRPM): discord.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers discord.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. RPMLINT OUTPUT (RPM): discord.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers discord.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_voice.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/discord/Discord ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/lib/'] discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_toaster.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_utils.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: W: no-documentation discord.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary Discord discord.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/discord.desktop /usr/bin/Discord JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ERRORS AND WARNINGS: * spelling-error: gamers is the proper plural of gamer. * invalid-license: rpmlint doesn't seem to support nonfree licenses * binaryinfo-readelf-failed: It's right. There's aren't ELF binaries, as they're ZIP files. Not sure how to remove this error, but am more than willing to do something to fix this. * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath: The developer has built their proprietary binary to use bundled libraries. It's not ideal, but it's what they've done. I can try to convince them to just include those libs as a requirement in their Linux release. * no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary: No documentation is provided for Discord outside of their website. * desktopfile-without-binary: /usr/bin/Discord is a symlink to /usr/lib64/discord/Discord due to the bundled libraries. NOTES: This is my first RPMFusion package (and first desktop application package), but not my first package. I package re2c and openvpn-auth-ldap for EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 9 months

1
30
0 / 0

[Bug 3749] New: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 Bug #: 3749 Summary: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... Description: Kodi frontend for MythTV (up to MythTV 0.28). Supports streaming of live TV & recordings, listening to radio channels, EPG and timers. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 3717] New: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 Bug #: 3717 Summary: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform-1... Description: Kodi platform support library. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 4029] New: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4029 Bug #: 4029 Summary: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 4027 Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Description: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora? It depends on FS-UAE. rpmlint output: [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-documentation fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-arcade fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/utf-8.zip fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/iso-8859-1.zip 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 11 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 3747] New: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple - Kodi's IPTV Simple client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3747 Bug #: 3747 Summary: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple - Kodi's IPTV Simple client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple/kodi-pvr-... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-iptvsimple/kodi-pvr-... Description: Kodi PVR addon for IPTV support, with M3U playlists, streaming of live TV for multicast/unicast sources, listening to radio channels and EPG. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years

3
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2855] New: Flowblade

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 Bug #: 2855 Summary: Flowblade Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux released under GPL 3 license. Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible editing experience. Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips. Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites unless correct work flow is followed. spec file: ---------- http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years

1
36
0 / 0

[Bug 3694] New: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3694 Bug #: 3694 Summary: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/flowblade.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69... Description: Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux released under GPL 3 license. Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible editing experience. Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips. Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites unless correct work flow is followed. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package belongs to rpmfusion, because it uses streamripper and GStreamer-plugins (which are not in Fedora) to decode audio. rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.noarch.rpm flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multiracial flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time line, time-line, timeliness flowblade.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.src.rpm flowblade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack -> multiracial flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time line, time-line, timeliness flowblade.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/mime/packages/flowblade 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years

1
33
0 / 0

[Bug 4028] New: fs-uae-launcher - Graphical configuration frontend and launcher for FS-UAE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4028 Bug #: 4028 Summary: fs-uae-launcher - Graphical configuration frontend and launcher for FS-UAE Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 4027 Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-launcher.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-launcher-2.6.... Description: FS-UAE Launcher is a graphical configuration program and launcher for FS-UAE. Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora? It depends on FS-UAE. rpmlint output: [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-launcher-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm fs-uae-launcher.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/fs-uae-launcher-2.6.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm fs-uae-launcher.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front end, front-end fs-uae-launcher.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/fs-uae-launcher/share-dir fs-uae-launcher.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-launcher fs-uae-launcher.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-launcher/fsbc/tests/zipfile/utf-8.zip fs-uae-launcher.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-launcher/fsbc/tests/zipfile/iso-8859-1.zip 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 1 month

1
15
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2017