February 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3742] New: kodi-pvr-demo - Demo PVR for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Bug #: 3742 Summary: kodi-pvr-demo - Demo PVR for Kodi Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-demo/kodi-pvr-demo.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-demo/kodi-pvr-demo-1... Description: Demo PVR client. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3743] New: kodi-pvr-dvblink - Kodi's DVBLink client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 Bug #: 3743 Summary: kodi-pvr-dvblink - Kodi's DVBLink client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-dvblink/kodi-pvr-dvb... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-dvblink/kodi-pvr-dvb... Description: PVR plugin for DVBLink. Supports streaming of Live TV & recordings, EPG, timers. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3744] New: kodi-pvr-dvbviewer - Kodi's DVBViewer client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 Bug #: 3744 Summary: kodi-pvr-dvbviewer - Kodi's DVBViewer client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-dvbviewer/kodi-pvr-d... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-dvbviewer/kodi-pvr-d... Description: Kodi's frontend for DVBViewer. Supports streaming of live TV, timers, recordings & EPG. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3741] New: kodi-pvr-argustv - Kodi's ARGUS TV client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741 Bug #: 3741 Summary: kodi-pvr-argustv - Kodi's ARGUS TV client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-argustv/kodi-pvr-arg... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-argustv/kodi-pvr-arg... Description: Kodi frontend for the ARGUS TV PVR (http://www.argus-tv.com/). Supports streaming of live TV & recordings, listening to radio channels, EPG and schedules. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2681] New: akmods for EL6

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2681 Bug #: 2681 Summary: akmods for EL6 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jcpunk(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org May I request the akmods package be built for EL6? It seems like an excellent alternative to DKMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 6 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 4152] New: Review Request: vdr-softhddevice-openglosd - A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4152 Bug #: 4152 Summary: Review Request: vdr-softhddevice-openglosd - A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd... SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd... Description: %description A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR. With this version of the plugin softhddevice an OpenGL accelerated OSD output was added. That works only with VDPAU output on NVidia cards. Video decoder CPU / VDPAU Video output VDPAU Audio FFMpeg / Alsa / Analog Audio FFMpeg / Alsa / Digital Audio FFMpeg / OSS / Analog HDMI/SPDIF pass-through Software volume, compression, normalize and channel resample VDR ScaleVideo API Software deinterlacer Bob (VA-API only) Autocrop Grab image (VDPAU only) Suspend / Dettach Letterbox, Stretch and Center cut-out video display modes atmo light support with plugin http://github.com/durchflieger/DFAtmo PIP (Picture-in-Picture) (VDPAU only) Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package cannot go into Fedoraproject because of ffmpeg code. %changelog * Tue Jul 19 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5 - update for new git snapshot * Tue Jun 28 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.6.1-10.20160607gitdc8740b - Added ffmpeg_2.9.patch * Fri Jun 10 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.6.1-9.20160607gitdc8740b - update for new git snapshot * Tue Mar 29 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.6.1-8.20160327gitfd3db0b - update for new git snapshot * Sun Jan 31 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.6.1-7.20160131gitefd60c8 - first build of softhddevice-openglosd version rpmlint -i vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-debuginfo-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.x86_64.rpm vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resample -> re sample, re-sample, res ample The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deinterlacer -> interlace, interlard, intercede The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atmo -> atom, ammo, at mo The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resample -> re sample, re-sample, res ample The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deinterlacer -> interlace, interlard, intercede The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atmo -> atom, ammo, at mo The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 3176] New: Review Request: mscore-tahoma-fonts - Microsoft core Tahoma fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176 Bug #: 3176 Summary: Review Request: mscore-tahoma-fonts - Microsoft core Tahoma fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org TTF Tahoma fonts that was distributed by Microsoft as part of the Word Reader package having sort of a "free" license. Nowadays available from the Sourceforge mscorefonts2 project. These fonts are not redistributable, hence the lpf wrapper. spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-tahoma-fo... srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-tahoma-fo... target spec and srpm in: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-tahoma-fonts/1 Rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target packages besides spelling errors and the target package license. Since this is about building a non-free package this should go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3177] New: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3177 Bug #: 3177 Summary: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org TrueType core fonts for the web that prior to 2002 was available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ , updated in the European Union Expansion Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. The Tahoma font (often distributed with the fonts in this package) is in a separate package mscore-tahoma-fonts due to different license terms. --- spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts-2.2-1.fc20... Target spec and srpmat: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/ These fonts are not redistributable, hence the lpf wrapper. rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This is about building a non-free package, so this should go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3178] New: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178 Bug #: 3178 Summary: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Cleartype fonts made available to the public in the PowerPoint Viewer package around 2006. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-... target spec and srpm in: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1 rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This lpf package builds a non-free target and should thus go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3601] New: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 Bug #: 3601 Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org - spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec - src rpm: https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src... - descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages): Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications. - why not in Fedora: Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9 - is this my first rpmfusion package no, I've already filed another package: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 - am I seeking a sponsor: no, I am Fedora sponsored packager - rpmlint on src rpm: spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > this is why Fedora don't accept the package spread.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz > source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form - rpmlint on rpms: spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > -devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned .so in -libs spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 > let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
13
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2017