[Bug 2222] New: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222
Bug #: 2222
Summary: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path
Library
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Spec URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp-0.0.2-0.1.20111219giteb97a6...
Description:
The libactp (Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library) is an implementation of the
GPL'ed algorithm demonstrated in FreeSteel as a set of C library functions
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
"Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external
code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those
external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only
[...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in
Fedora"[1]
Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE
(HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume
the term "not useful" applies here.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
rpmlint output:
SPECS/libactp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
libactp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball.
Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 9 months
[Bug 2363] New: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
Bug #: 2363
Summary: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedora(a)marionline.it
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec
SRPMS:
http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.bui...
Description:
Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator
that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo!
and many other useful features.
Why here:
This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream
use ffmpeg library.
Rpmlint:
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I
include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this
two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository.
This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for
another SIP software, homer:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 9 months
nVidia howto question or solution
by Sérgio Basto
Hello,
After on IRC another fellow, had problems on install nVidia drives on
first installation and reboot, I also had a similar problem that make
me think. And I think I found the issue, instead try blacklist nouveau
on boot we should run:
dracut -f /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r)
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia package have blacklist-nouveau.conf [1] but just
install a new kernel nouveau enter in blacklist isn't it ? , so after
installing nVidia drives (for the first time) we should also run dracut
to generate initramfs without nouveau module isn't it ? anyway like
blacklist-nouveau.conf text says.
Conclusion we should/need update https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
Best regards,
[1]
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.git/tree/bl
acklist-nouveau.conf
--
Sérgio M. B.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 4441] New: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text
chat for gamers
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441
Bug ID: 4441
Summary: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text
chat for gamers
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: seancallaway(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord.spec
SRPM URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord-0.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
DESCRIPTION:
Discord is a free-of-cost proprietary VoIP application designed for gaming
communities.
WHY NOT IN FEDORA?
Discord is a proprietary application *and* relies on nonfree libraries (such as
ffmpeg), which the developer has bundled into the application.
RPMLINT OUTPUT (SRPM):
discord.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers
discord.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
RPMLINT OUTPUT (RPM):
discord.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers
discord.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed
/usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_voice.zip readelf: Error: Not an
ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
discord.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/discord/Discord
['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/lib/']
discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed
/usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_toaster.zip readelf: Error: Not
an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed
/usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_utils.zip readelf: Error: Not an
ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
discord.x86_64: W: no-documentation
discord.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary Discord
discord.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary
/usr/share/applications/discord.desktop /usr/bin/Discord
JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ERRORS AND WARNINGS:
* spelling-error: gamers is the proper plural of gamer.
* invalid-license: rpmlint doesn't seem to support nonfree licenses
* binaryinfo-readelf-failed: It's right. There's aren't ELF binaries, as
they're ZIP files. Not sure how to remove this error, but am more than willing
to do something to fix this.
* binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath: The developer has built their proprietary
binary to use bundled libraries. It's not ideal, but it's what they've done. I
can try to convince them to just include those libs as a requirement in their
Linux release.
* no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary: No documentation is provided
for Discord outside of their website.
* desktopfile-without-binary: /usr/bin/Discord is a symlink to
/usr/lib64/discord/Discord due to the bundled libraries.
NOTES:
This is my first RPMFusion package (and first desktop application package), but
not my first package. I package re2c and openvpn-auth-ldap for EPEL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 4029] New: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4029
Bug #: 4029
Summary: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Depends on: 4027
Blocks: 2
Spec file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade.spec
Source RPM:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-...
Description:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-...
Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora?
It depends on FS-UAE.
rpmlint output:
[andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen,
Full-screen, Firescreen
fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full
screen, full-screen, firescreen
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full
screen, Full-screen, Firescreen
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen ->
full screen, full-screen, firescreen
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-documentation
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-arcade
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip
/usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/utf-8.zip
fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip
/usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/iso-8859-1.zip
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years
[Bug 2855] New: Flowblade
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Bug #: 2855
Summary: Flowblade
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux
released under GPL 3 license.
Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible
editing experience.
Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually
automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing
clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by
trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips.
Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts
and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites
unless correct work flow is followed.
spec file:
----------
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 1 month
[Bug 3694] New: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3694
Bug #: 3694
Summary: Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video
editor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/flowblade.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69...
Description: Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for
Linux
released under GPL 3 license.
Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible
editing experience.
Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually
automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing
clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by
trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips.
Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts
and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites
unless correct work flow is followed.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
This package belongs to rpmfusion, because it uses streamripper and
GStreamer-plugins (which are not in Fedora) to decode audio.
rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.noarch.rpm
flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial
flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack ->
multiracial
flowblade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time
line, time-line, timeliness
flowblade.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
rpmlint flowblade-1.0.0-1.git94f69ce.fc22.src.rpm
flowblade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multitrack -> Multiracial
flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multitrack ->
multiracial
flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> time line,
time-line, timeliness
flowblade.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/mime/packages/flowblade
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 1 month
