May 2018 - rpmfusion-developers

RPM Fusion update report 2018-05-13

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 26 ------------- Pushed to testing: VirtualBox-5.2.12-1.fc26 VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.12-2.fc26 mythtv-29.1-17.19.20180510.g0849e99596.fc26 Pushed to stable: kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc26 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc26 Fedora 27 ------------- Pushed to testing: VirtualBox-5.2.12-1.fc27 VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.12-2.fc27 deadbeef-0.7.2-6.fc27 mythtv-29.1-17.19.20180510.g0849e99596.fc27 qtox-1.15.0-2.fc27 Pushed to stable: devedeng-4.10.0-1.fc27 devedeng-4.11.0-1.fc27 kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc27 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc27 Fedora 28 ------------- Pushed to testing: VirtualBox-5.2.12-1.fc28 VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.12-2.fc28 compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.14-2.fc28 deadbeef-0.7.2-6.fc28 mlt-freeworld-6.8.0-1.fc28 mythtv-29.1-17.19.20180510.g0849e99596.fc28 qtox-1.15.0-2.fc28 shotcut-18.05.08-1.fc28 Pushed to stable: VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-3.fc28 devedeng-4.10.0-1.fc28 devedeng-4.11.0-1.fc28 kodi-17.6-9.fc28 kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc28 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc28 libmpeg2-0.5.1-15.fc28 vdr-vaapidevice-0.7.0-6.20180401gita17c110.fc28 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: VirtualBox-5.2.12-1.el7 VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.12-2.el7 Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 26 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: discord-0.0.4-3.fc26 discord-0.0.5-1.fc26 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc26 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc26 Fedora 27 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: caja-dropbox-1.20.0-1.fc27 discord-0.0.4-3.fc27 discord-0.0.5-1.fc27 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc27 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc27 Fedora 28 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: caja-dropbox-1.20.0-1.fc28 discord-0.0.5-1.fc28 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc28 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc28 nemo-dropbox-3.8.0-1.fc28 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4826] New: Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 Bug ID: 4826 Summary: Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: uklotz(a)mixxx.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free, nonfree Pull Request: https://github.com/rpmfusion/mixxx/pull/1 The individual commits in this branch can be viewed as a changelog: - Update (remove/add) the build requirements for the upcoming release 2.1 - Modify the build options to result in an almost feature complete executable and plugins with portable optimizations enabled 2 Remarks: - I noticed that Mixxx is currently part of the free repository, although with inclusion of the FAAD2 plugin it should actually be placed in the nonfree repository? - We already pulled the included patch into our current 2.1 release branch. This can be removed when upgrading to the latest snapshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 4835] New: Review Request: b43-firmware - Firmware for Broadcom wireless devices

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4835 Bug ID: 4835 Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - Firmware for Broadcom wireless devices Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: nonfree SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/b43-firmware-6.30.163.46-1.fc26.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/b43-firmware.spec Summary: Firmware for Broadcom wireless devices This package target the nonfree (tainted) section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
5
0 / 0

Building issue on F28

by Robert-André Mauchin

Hello, My build of qTox fails on F28 with the following error: > No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(toxcore)' http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=224710 I'm pretty damn certain that toxcore is available for F28 in the updates repo. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1073692 Also F27 and Rawhide builds work fine. Any idea what could cause this? Are F28 chroot missing the "updates" repo? Best regards, Robert-André

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4197] New: Package Review: deadbeef - An audio player for GNU/Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4197 Bug #: 4197 Summary: Package Review: deadbeef - An audio player for GNU/Linux Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: vascom2(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org URL: http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/about.html Description: DeaDBeeF (as in 0xDEADBEEF) is an audio player for GNU/Linux systems with X11 (though now it also runs in plain console without X, in FreeBSD, and in OpenSolaris). Main features (the list is most likely far from complete): mp3, ogg vorbis, flac, ape, wv/iso.wv, wav, m4a/mp3 (aac and alac), mpc, tta, cd audio, and many more nsf, ay, vtx, vgm/vgz, spc and many other popular chiptune formats SID with HVSC song length database support for sid tracker modules - mod, s3m, it, xm, etc ID3v1, ID3v2.2, ID3v2.3, ID3v2.4, APEv2, Xing/Info, VorbisComments tag reading and writing, as well as reading many other tag/metadata formats in most supported formats automatic character set detection for non-unicode id3 tags - supports cp1251, iso8859-1, and now chinese cp936 (optional), as well as SHIFT-JIS and MS-DOS CP866 for selected formats unicode tags are fully supported as well (both utf8 and ucs2) cuesheet (.cue files) support, including charset detection/conversion clean fast GUI using GTK2 and GTK3, you pick what you like more! no GNOME or KDE dependencies minimization to system tray, with scrollwheel volume control, etc drag and drop, both in playlist, and from other apps control playback from command line global hotkeys multiple playlists using tabbed interface album cover display OSD notifications about current playing songs 18-band graphical equalizer and other DSP plugins built-in high quality tag editor, with custom fields support customizable groups in playlists customizable columns with flexible title formatting streaming radio support for ogg vorbis, mp3 and aac streams gapless playback for correctly encoded files lots of plugin, such as global hotkeys, last.fm scrobbler, converter, and many more, sdk is included comes with advanced Converter plugin, which allows to transcode files to other formats was tested on x86, x86_64, powerpc, arm, mips architectures, should work on most modern platforms new features are being added all the time -- check for updates frequently! SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/deadbeef/master/deadbeef.... SRPM: http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/packages/deadbeef/0.7.2/3.fc26/sr... I am know about rpmlint message E: call-to-mktemp /usr/lib64/deadbeef/converter.so But author don't want rewrite working code because of automatic cheking tool message. I think we could make an exclusion for this package because it in rarely using converter plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

3
29
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2018-05-06

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 26 ------------- Pushed to testing: kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc26 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc26 Pushed to stable: Fedora 27 ------------- Pushed to testing: devedeng-4.10.0-1.fc27 devedeng-4.11.0-1.fc27 kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc27 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc27 Pushed to stable: shotcut-18.03.06-1.fc27 Fedora 28 ------------- Pushed to testing: VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-3.fc28 devedeng-4.10.0-1.fc28 devedeng-4.11.0-1.fc28 kodi-17.6-9.fc28 kodi-inputstream-adaptive-2.0.20-0.1.20180329gitc51b9a9.fc28 kodi-visualization-spectrum-1.1.4-1.fc28 libmpeg2-0.5.1-15.fc28 nvidia-video-codec-sdk-8.1.24-1.fc28 vdr-vaapidevice-0.7.0-6.20180401gita17c110.fc28 Pushed to stable: audacity-freeworld-2.2.2-5.fc28 shotcut-18.03.06-1.fc28 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 26 ------------- Pushed to testing: discord-0.0.4-3.fc26 discord-0.0.5-1.fc26 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc26 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc26 Pushed to stable: Fedora 27 ------------- Pushed to testing: caja-dropbox-1.20.0-1.fc27 discord-0.0.4-3.fc27 discord-0.0.5-1.fc27 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc27 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc27 Pushed to stable: Fedora 28 ------------- Pushed to testing: caja-dropbox-1.20.0-1.fc28 discord-0.0.4-3.fc28 discord-0.0.5-1.fc28 lpf-spotify-client-1.0.79.223-1.fc28 mednafen-1.21.3-1.fc28 nemo-dropbox-3.8.0-1.fc28 Pushed to stable: EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

5 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4806] New: Review Request: vdr-vaapidevice - A VA-API output device plugin for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4806 Bug ID: 4806 Summary: Review Request: vdr-vaapidevice - A VA-API output device plugin for VDR Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: mgansser(a)online.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-vaapidevice.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-vaapidevice-0.7.0-1.20... %description A VA-API output device plugin for VDR. Based on softhddevice by Johns: http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-softhddevice Video decoder CPU / VAAPI Video output VAAPI Audio FFMpeg / Alsa / Analog / Digital HDMI/SPDIF pass-through VDR ScaleVideo API Autocrop Grab image (no OSD!) Suspend / Detach Letterbox, Stretch and Center cut-out video display modes Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package cannot go into Fedoraproject because of ffmpeg code. %changelog * Sun Feb 25 2018 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.7.0-1.20180220git6372704 - Initial build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
21
0 / 0

[Bug 4535] New: Review request: kodi-visualization-spectrum - Spectrum visualizer for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4535 Bug ID: 4535 Summary: Review request: kodi-visualization-spectrum - Spectrum visualizer for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: development-K9RvgheM1OmXW9pm(a)dcrdev.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Hello, I'd like to submit a package for the inputstream.adaptive Kodi plugin, to be reviewed. The spec, debuginfo and source rpm can be found here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/... https://github.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/releases/downlo... https://github.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-visualization-spectrum/releases/downlo... A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file): An OpenGL Spectrum visualizer for Kodi - this is the default visualization for Kodi on other platforms i.e. Ubuntu, Windows etc... Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. This is an extension of Kodi and therefore for the same reasons as Kodi this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. 1 Error in opengl_spectrum.cpp - this is relation to the wrong address being used on the license upstream. I will file a bug upstream. Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. I have another package awaiting review, I have never previously had a package approved. Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I am not a sponsored packager, so yes I am seeking a sponsor. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
15
0 / 0

Couple of Questions

by development-k9rvghem1omxw9pm＠dcrdev.com

Hi, I have a couple of questions regarding package maintenance - apologies if this is covered elsewhere; I couldn't find anything. - How long does it usually take between updating a package and it being pulled into the repo? - In regards to updating a package what is the process in regards to review. I'm presuming that anything more than a version bump - requires a review? Or am I wrong - does every commit have to be reviewed? Thanks in anticipation, Dominic

5 years, 11 months

3
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2018