November 2020 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5642] New: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5642 Bug ID: 5642 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything from real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything else media-related. Its plugin-based architecture means that new data types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new plugins. This package provides FFmpeg-based GStreamer plug-ins. FAS login: rathann Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. Also, it depends on FFmpeg, which is in RPM Fusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 476] Review request: blender-freeworld - Additional parts of blender not distributed in Fedora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1028] Review Request: ogmrip-oggz - Oggz plugin for ogmrip

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1028 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1594] Review Request : Frets on Fire - A game of musical skill and fast fingers

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1823] Review request: tumbler-freeworld - Tumbler Video Thumbnailer Plugin

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1823 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2151] New: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151 Bug #: 2151 Summary: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Perle Systems makes several PCI and PCIe serial cards, but there support for linux 2.6 and 3.x is lacking. This package patches their driver tarball and builds it as per rpmfusion as kmod. ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod.spec ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0-6.1.fc16.1.sr... == description == This package provides a driver for the family of Perle serial cards. The cards supported are: Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 SI cards Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, and 8i Express cards Perle PCI-RAS V.92 (4 and 8 port) cards Perle Speed1, 2, 4, and 8 LE cards Read /usr/share/doc/perle-serial/README for more info. ==== This is a kmod package, and as such can't be included in Fedora. ==== $ rpmlint perle-serial-kmod.spec perle-serial-kmod.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 44, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ The spaces come as a result of cut&paste of taking the description directly from upstream files. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/*perle-serial* kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C perle-serial kernel module(s) for 3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64 kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/extra/perle-serial/perle-serial.ko kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: no-documentation perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland -> user land, user-land, slanderous perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Userland -> User land, User-land, Slanderous perle-serial-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0/_kmod_build_3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/perle-serial.c 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. $ "Userland" and "Metapackage" are legitimate words in this lexicon. The wrong FSF address in perle-serial.c is directly from the upstream sources. Kernel modules are unstripped (or they wouldn't load otherwise). The not capitalized warning applies to a string that's generated from a macro. The documentation is in the -common package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2696] New: ogmrip-profiles - Collection of profiles for OGMRip

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2696 Bug #: 2696 Summary: ogmrip-profiles - Collection of profiles for OGMRip Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: giallu(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org This is a very simple package containing few XML files with ogmrip profiles. http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmrip-profiles.spec http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmrip-profiles-0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 2909] New: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2909 Bug #: 2909 Summary: gtkradiant - Level design program for video games Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: bebo.sudo(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant/F18/SRPM/g... SRPM: http://sourceforge.net/projects/bebosudo-rpms/files/gtkradiant/F18/SRPM/g... Description: GtkRadiant is a powerful level editor used for various ego-shooter games. It stores level data in text format and uses compilers (q3map2 for QuakeIII, for instance) to create the binary map files. For more detailed information see: http://icculus.org/gtkradiant/ ----------- I've yet tried to submit gtkradiant to the redhat bugzilla, but it needs proprietary SDK to works, so I've to submit to rpmfusion. Here is the old bug in the rh bugzilla (now closed): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836840 I've followed all Hans' tips and I re-packaged the rpm with the last sources available. Here is the result from rpmlint on the spec and on all the rpms: $ rpmlint -i gtkradiant.spec ../SRPMS/gtkradiant-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/gtkradiant-{1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.x86_64.rpm,debuginfo-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.x86_64.rpm} ../RPMS/noarch/gtkradiant-data-1.6.3-9.20130803git.fc18.noarch.rpm gtkradiant.spec: W: invalid-url Source4: gtkradiant-1.6-gamepacks-20130805.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. gtkradiant.src: W: invalid-url Source4: gtkradiant-1.6-gamepacks-20130805.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib64/gtkradiant/installs /usr/share/gtkradiant/gamepacks The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary q3map2 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary q3map2_urt Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gtkradiant Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. gtkradiant.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/gtkradiant.desktop gtkradiant the .desktop file is for a file not present in the package. You should check the requires or see if this is not a error gtkradiant-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings. $ The first two warnings I think could be ignored because the source is created manually, because the upstream doesn't provide a package for the SDKs. All the docs are in the gtkradiant-data package, so I don't know if I have to put some docs manually to solve the third warning. in the fourth warning, rpmlint complains about a "dangling-symlink", but I think it shouldn't do it, because it refer at the gamepacks present in the data package and, as said by rpmlint itself, its a chain of packages. the other three warnings regard the lack of documentation to the three execs, but I don't know where to find it. the "desktopfile-without-binary" warning is a strange error, because the gtkradiant exec exist, and I don't know how to solve it. And finally, the error at the end I really don't know what it means and how to solve it. But the biggest problem is that package can't work because gtkradiant try to write in the folder where it is present the exec. I have already reported it to the developers but nobody helped me. here is the link at the discussion on the ML: http://icculus.org/pipermail/gtkradiant/2013-February/011841.html Any sort of help is appreciated :) Thanks for your time, have a nice day! Alberto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 3001] New: Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3001 Bug #: 3001 Summary: Review request: nouveau-firmware - Firwmare files used by the nouveau Linux kernel driver Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: chemobejk(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spawned from discussion in bug #2633 ---------------------------------------------------------- SPEC: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1199 FYI: The SRPM will use the same Nvidia blob files as xorg-x11-drv-nvidia. ---------------------------------------------------------- %description This package includes firmware files required for the nouveau kernel driver to activate Video acceleration on certain Nvidia devices. ---------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint SRPMS/nouveau-firmware-325.15-1.fc19.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/nouveau-firmware-325.15-1.fc19.noarch.rpm nouveau-firmware.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Firwmare -> Firmware, Firearm - Oops will fix that of course :-) nouveau-firmware.src: W: file-size-mismatch extract_firmware.py = 11218, https://raw.github.com/imirkin/re-vp2/master/extract_firmware.py = 10692 - I made modifications to this script to enable use in "packaging mode" nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Firwmare -> Firmware, Firearm - see above nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - No idea. The binary package has only firmware files for the kernel, i.e. /usr/lib/firmware/nouveau/* nouveau-firmware.noarch: W: no-documentation - Good point. I guess I could add a README with a URL pointing to the nouveau Video Acceleration page 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------- This is my first RPMFusion package. I'm a Fedora sponsored package though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 4105] New: Review request: sdcc-nonfree - Small Device C Compiler - nonfree files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4105 Bug #: 4105 Summary: Review request: sdcc-nonfree - Small Device C Compiler - nonfree files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rrankin(a)ihug.com.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: https://github.com/rrankin/sdcc-nonfree/blob/master/sdcc-nonfree.spec Source URL: https://github.com/rrankin/sdcc-nonfree/blob/master/sdcc-nonfree-3.6.0-1.... Description: Files derived from Microchip files which are licensed for use for Microchip devices only. Files used for compiling code for 14 and 16 bit PIC processors. The sdcc --use-non-free flag must be used to access these files during compilation and linking. License: Restricting use for Microchip devices only makes license on the files in this package non-free from a Fedora perspective. Rpmlint: rpmlint sdcc-nonfree.spec sdcc-nonfree.spec:51: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. note: %configure is not used as files end up in wrong directory $ rpmlint sdcc-nonfree-3.6.0-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: W: invalid-license Redistributable but use for Microchip devices only sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/sdcc/non-free/lib/pic16/libdev18f66j60.lib sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/share/sdcc/non-free/lib/pic16/libdev18f66j60.lib readelf: Error: /tmp/rpmlint.sdcc-nonfree-3.6.0-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm.fjysaswk/usr/share/sdcc/non-free/lib/pic16/libdev18f66j60.lib: did not find a valid archive header ... Repeated for each .lib file in package sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: W: no-documentation sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sdcc/non-free/include/pic14/pic16lf1829.h ... Repeats for each .h file in package sdcc-nonfree.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sdcc/non-free/include/pic16/pic18lf4580.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 724 errors, 1452 warnings. Notes: 1 W: invalid-license - Licence not suitable for Fedora 2 E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share - The .lib files are not lib files to be run on the host machine but rather to be included in the generated PIC code. The .libs files may be arch dependant only do to the endian of the host machine. /usr/share is where sdcc expects to find them. 3 W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed - The .lib files are not elf files. 4 W: no-documentation - All documentation is in sdcc package 5 W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package - The .h files are required for sdcc operation on PIC code and thus should not be in a -devel package $ rpmlint sdcc-nonfree-devel-3.6.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm sdcc-nonfree-devel.noarch: W: invalid-license Redistributable but use for Microchip devices only sdcc-nonfree-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Notes: 1 Invalid license is keeping these files out of Fedora 2 Contains source files which are own documentation This is my first rpmfusion package I am a sponsored Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 6 months

1
3
0 / 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2020