July 2020 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4960] New: Review request: sch_cake - Kernel module (kmod) for sch_cake

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4960 Bug ID: 4960 Summary: Review request: sch_cake - Kernel module (kmod) for sch_cake Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dagofthedofg(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free URLs: https://github.com/survient/sch_cake/raw/master/sch_cake.spec https://github.com/survient/sch_cake/raw/master/sch_cake-0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: sch_cake common files. https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/CakeTechnical/ Justification: Kernel modules are not allowed in the stock Fedora Repositories rpmlint: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/sch_cake-0-1.fc28.src.rpm sch_cake.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) kmod -> mod, k mod, mood sch_cake.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C sch_cake sch_cake.src:1: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # Summary follows convention of other rpmfusion kmods including crystalhd # Not sure what spacing warning is, spec file looks clean $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sch_cake-0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm sch_cake.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) kmod -> mod, k mod, mood sch_cake.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C sch_cake sch_cake.x86_64: E: no-binary sch_cake.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. # Summary follows convention of other rpmfusion kmods # userland package, no binaries included # No documentation provided upstream Notes: This is my first RPMFusion package submission I am seeking a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 5074] New: Review request: raspberrypi-vc - VideoCore GPU libraries, utilities and demos for Raspberry Pi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5074 Bug ID: 5074 Summary: Review request: raspberrypi-vc - VideoCore GPU libraries, utilities and demos for Raspberry Pi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: arm OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: rpi Why not Fedora? --------------- As far as I understand it, this package is too specific (rpi only) to be eligible for inclusion into the Fedora repos. I can of course research this more thoroughly if needed. FAS account name: kni SPECFILE --------- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/raspberry... SOURCE RPM ---------- http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3940/273940/raspberrypi-vc... Description ------------- Libraries, utilities and demos for the Raspberry Pi BCM283x SOC GPUs Essentially, this library will be a needed dependency for any package in the rpi namespace that accesses the PI's GPU. e.g. omxplayer NOTES ----- Credit goes to Vaughan Agrez with the FedBerry project for doing the majority of the work with this specfile. I have modified it to better fit RPMFusion packing standards and have removed requirements specific to FedBerry. This package represents a snapshot from an upstream project that does not have any releases. Hence, the unusual package name. This package places the following symlink for compatibility: /opt/vc -> %{_libdir}/vc I can see why this has been created, but I'm still on the fence on this one. I have not tested whether this is truly needed and can look into this further, if someone thinks we should leave /opt alone. This will be the first of multiple package requests for the rpi namespace, and I'm looking forward to receiving feedback for this package request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
43
0 / 0

[Bug 5082] New: Review request: dtv-scan-tables - Digital TV scan tables

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5082 Bug ID: 5082 Summary: Review request: dtv-scan-tables - Digital TV scan tables Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: anto.trande(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free 'dtv-scan-table' is required by 'tvheaded' This package is provided on Fedora but cannot be branched on el7 for missing dependencies (v4l-utils >= 1.4.0). This must be built for RPMFusion-el7 only, 'v4l' tools are compiled inside the builddir of 'dtv-scan-tables' RPM and just executed (and not installed) to convert the files provided in the 'dtv-scan-tables' source archive. SPEC file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/dtv-scan-tables/dtv-scan-tables.spec SRPM file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/dtv-scan-tables/dtv-scan-tables-1-1.201... Scratch build: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=275441 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 5022] New: Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5022 Bug ID: 5022 Summary: Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zebob.m(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC url: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard/wireguard.spec SRPM url: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard/wireguard-0.0.20180910-1.fc30... Koji scratch-build: F30: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=258182 EL7: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=258162 Description: WireGuard is a novel VPN that runs inside the Linux Kernel and utilizes state-of-the-art cryptography. It aims to be faster, simpler, leaner, and more useful than IPSec, while avoiding the massive headache. It intends to be considerably more performant than OpenVPN. WireGuard is designed as a general purpose VPN for running on embedded interfaces and super computers alike, fit for many different circumstances. It runs over UDP. FAS username: eclipseo Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.? It's the kmod common package. RPMlint output: $ rpmlint wireguard-0.0.20180910-1.fc28.noarch.rpm wireguard-0.0.20180910-1.fc28.src.rpm wireguard.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance wireguard.noarch: W: no-documentation wireguard.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US performant -> perform ant, perform-ant, performance 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The Wireguard packages have been tested successfully on F28 with Mullvad VPN service. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 5104] New: Review request: glmixer - Graphic Live Mixer

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104 Bug ID: 5104 Summary: Review request: glmixer - Graphic Live Mixer Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: mgansser(a)online.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/glmixer.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/glmixer-1.7.1837-1.fc29.sr... Description:Real-time video mixing software for live performance. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg this package belongs to rpmfusion, due x264 dependencies. $ rpmlint -i -v glmixer.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/glmixer-1.7.1837-1.fc29.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-debugsource-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-debuginfo-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-debuginfo-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm glmixer.spec: I: checking glmixer.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: GLMixer-1.7.1837-Source.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. glmixer.src: I: checking glmixer.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/glmixer/ (timeout 10 seconds) glmixer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: GLMixer-1.7.1837-Source.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. glmixer.x86_64: I: checking glmixer.x86_64: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/glmixer/ (timeout 10 seconds) glmixer-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking glmixer-debugsource.x86_64: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/glmixer/ (timeout 10 seconds) (none): E: no installed packages by name /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-debuginfo-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glmixer-debuginfo-1.7.1837-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. %changelog * Sat Dec 08 2018 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.7.1837-1 - Initial package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 5103] New: New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5103 Bug ID: 5103 Summary: New Package: kodi-vfs-libarchive Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: klaasdemter+rpmfusion(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Created attachment 1991 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1991&action=edit Working specfile Hi, the support to playback from archive files was removed from kodi and moved into a vfs module. I tried to integrate it myself but I'm not fully understanding everything in the spec file. https://github.com/xbmc/vfs.libarchive latest release that should work with the current version: https://github.com/xbmc/vfs.libarchive/archive/1.0.4-Leia.tar.gz I've attached my idea of the spec file. sources file: b7fe9ddfd1db41c2d586c711d2e21b09 1.0.4-Leia.tar.gz Greetings Klaas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 5114] New: Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans integration with Google

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 Bug ID: 5114 Summary: Review request: ungoogled-chromium - Chromium, sans integration with Google Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dotqvint(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free Full URLs to the spec file, source RPM and binary RPM: - https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung... - https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung... - https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2018-12-18_1/ung... A short description for the package: ungoogled-chromium is Chromium, sans integration with Google. It also features some tweaks to enhance privacy, control, and transparency (almost all of which require manual activation or enabling). ungoogled-chromium retains the default Chromium experience as closely as possible. Unlike other Chromium forks that have their own visions of a web browser, ungoogled-chromium is essentially a drop-in replacement for Chromium. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because of proprietary codecs. This is my first RPM Fusion package. I wish to keep on improving it. I also seek a sponsor as I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager nor an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. ----------------------- rpmlint on source RPM ----------------------- This package is primarily based on Tom Callaway's <spot(a)fedoraproject.org> work. All rpmlint warnings and errors are also reproducible for the source RPM of the Fedora `chromium` package. * E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so Caused by this line: BuildRequires: /lib/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/libc.so Tom Callaway commented it as follows: # Really, this is what we want: # BuildRequires: glibc-devel(x86-32) libgcc(x86-32) # But, koji only offers glibc32. Maybe that's enough. # This BR will pull in either glibc.i686 or glibc32. * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(boringssl) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(bspatch) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(crashpad) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(dmg_fp) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(iccjpeg) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(mozc) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(re2) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(skia) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(xdg-mime) * W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(xdg-user-dirs) These warnings are caused by `Provides: bundled(...)` lines. Chromium uses its own forks of third-party libraries -- unbundling or versioning seem to be impossible. * E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel} * E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}/%{chromium_browser_channel}.sh * E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/chrome-sandbox These errors are caused by `semanage` invocations: semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel} semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t /usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}/%{chromium_browser_channel}.sh semanage fcontext -a -t chrome_sandbox_exec_t /usr/lib/chrome-sandbox Tom Callaway commented that semanage itself adjusts the lib directory naming. * W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 60, tab: line 98) * W: invalid-url Source2: depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz Revision of the file is accessible only from the Fedora Lookaside Cache. ----------------------- rpmlint on x86_64 RPM ----------------------- The most of the following warnings and errors are reproducible for the Fedora `chromium` package. * E: explicit-lib-dependency libcanberra-gtk3(x86-64) Chromium expects this GTK module for some reason. * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chromedriver * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/headless_shell * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/protoc * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/swiftshader/libEGL.so * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/swiftshader/libGLESv2.so * W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/ungoogled-chromium I'm not sure how to resolve this. Fedora package has similar warnings. * W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ungoogled-chromium/master_preferences Contains distro-specific settings, noreplace flag seems to be needless. * E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox * E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/ungoogled-chromium * E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/headless_shell * E: setuid-binary /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox root 4755 * E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/chrome-sandbox 4755 I'm not sure what can I do here. Both Fedora package and chromium-vaapi have similar errors. * E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/pyproto/google/protobuf/internal/__init__.py * E: htaccess-file /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/.htaccess * E: zero-length /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/emulated_devices/emulated_devices_module.js * E: zero-length /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/js_profiler/js_profiler_module.js * E: zero-length /usr/lib64/ungoogled-chromium/resources/inspector/node_debugger/node_debugger_module.js Resource files. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
28
0 / 0

[Bug 5522] New: Review request: mopidy-spotify - Mopidy extension for playing music from Spotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 Bug ID: 5522 Summary: Review request: mopidy-spotify - Mopidy extension for playing music from Spotify Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: t-rpmfusion(a)girst.at CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: nonfree SRPM: https://github.com/fork-graveyard/libspotify-rpmfusion/releases/download/... SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fork-graveyard/libspotify-rpmfusion/mop... Description: Mopidy extension for playing music from Spotify. (Mopidy itself is free software, and packaged for Fedora already) Why not eligible for Fedora: requires python-pyspotify from rpmfusion-nonfree % rpmlint result/*rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Question for the reviewer: This package has a dependency that is ExclusiveArch -- do I need to declare this one EA too? Thanks in advance. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 5154] New: Review request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154 Bug ID: 5154 Summary: Review request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: gombosg(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Repo: https://pagure.io/libldac Spec: https://pagure.io/libldac/blob/master/f/libldac.spec SRPM: https://pagure.io/libldac/blob/master/f/libldac-2.0.2.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: LDAC library from AOSP. LDAC is an audio coding technology developed by Sony. It enables the transmission of High-Resolution Audio content, even over a Bluetooth connection. pulseaudio-modules-bluetooth-aptx cannot be included in Fedora due to a build dependency on ffmpeg. For compatible headsets, this package enables LDAC encoding over Bluetooth for pulseaudio-modules-bluetooth-aptx. Rpmlint output - spec: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint output - binary: libldac.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libldacBT_abr.so.2.0.2.2 libldac.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libldacBT_enc.so.2.0.2.2 libldac.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Please let me know if binary stripping is needed and how to do it. The .so file names are libldacBT.so... in the source cmake files, libldac and libldacBT are both used, but IMHO the package should simply be named libldac. This is my first RPM(Fusion) package. I'm looking for a sponsor because of this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 5478] New: Review Request: retroarch - Cross-platform, sophisticated frontend for the libretro API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478 Bug ID: 5478 Summary: Review Request: retroarch - Cross-platform, sophisticated frontend for the libretro API Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: nonfree https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/retroarch/fedora-31-... https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/retroarch/fedora-31-... Description: libretro is an API that exposes generic audio/video/input callbacks. A frontend for libretro (such as RetroArch) handles video output, audio output, input and application lifecycle. A libretro core written in portable C or C++ can run seamlessly on many platforms with very little to no porting effort. While RetroArch is the reference frontend for libretro, several other projects have used the libretro interface to include support for emulators and/or game engines. libretro is completely open and free for anyone to use. Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/retroarch Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora? Requires ffmpeg and NVIDIA Cg Toolkit for non-free version. --- We trying to package two versions - free and non-free. Non-free version requires free version from main Fedora repo. Also would be nice to package non-free libretro cores in RPM Fusion in future. RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778299 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
34
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2020