[Bug 5216] New: Review request: libftl - FTL audio/video streaming
library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5216
Bug ID: 5216
Summary: Review request: libftl - FTL audio/video streaming
library
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
FTL-SDK is a cross platform SDK written in C to enable sending audio/video to
mixer using FTL service.
This package is not in Fedora as it relies on codecs.
Also, it is very specific to OBS Studio which is only in RPM Fusion.
Installation RPM:
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/libftl/0.9.14/libftl-0.9.14-...
.src.rpm and .spec files:
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/libftl/0.9.14/libftl-0.9.14-...
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/Packages/libftl/0.9.14/libftl.spec
This is not my first package, I already maintain OBS Studio.
Package is actually result of a bug report[1].
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/libftl-0.9.14-1.fc29.src.rpm
libftl.src:44: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}.so*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/libftl-0.9.14-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/libftl-devel-0.9.14-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
libftl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/libftl-debuginfo-0.9.14-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Choose to ignore hardcoded library as it is actually part where it is moved to
proper location, as opposed to where install scripts puts it.
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5057
Kind regards,
Momcilo "Momo" Medic.
(fedorauser)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 5482] New: Review request: libspotify - Official Spotify API
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5482
Bug ID: 5482
Summary: Review request: libspotify - Official Spotify API
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: t-rpmfusion(a)girst.at
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
Description: "libspotify is the official Spotify API. Applications can use
this API to play music using a user's Spotify account, provided that the user
has a Spotify Premium Account."
libspotify was retired after fc26, I would like to package it again (and plan
to also package its users pyspotify and Mopidy{,-Spotify}, but one thing at a
time).
The package is not eligible for Fedora because it is nonfree.
rpmlint output:
~ % rpmlint result/libspotify-12.1.51-6.fc30.x86_64.rpm
libspotify.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspotify.so.12.1.51
_exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
~ % rpmlint result/libspotify-devel-12.1.51-6.fc30.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
~ % rpmlint result/libspotify-12.1.51-6.fc30.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
(I can't do anything about the shared-lib-calls-exit, since it is binary-only)
This is my first contribution to rpmfusion (and to any Fedora repository in
general, but I have made rpms before), so I am looking for someone to sponsor
me here (greatly appreciated).
The spec file and src.rpm are currently available at:
-
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fork-graveyard/libspotify-rpmfusion/mas...
-
https://github.com/fork-graveyard/libspotify-rpmfusion/releases/download/...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 5268] New: Review request: dptfxtract - Utility to generate a
thermald configuration from DPTF
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
Bug ID: 5268
Summary: Review request: dptfxtract - Utility to generate a
thermald configuration from DPTF
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: benjamin(a)sipsolutions.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
spec file: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract.spec
SRPM: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract-1.3-1.fc30.src.rpm
RPM: https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract-1.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
Upstream: https://github.com/intel/dptfxtract
Description:
This is a companion tool to Linux Thermal Daemon (thermald). This tool tries to
reuse some of the tables used by "Intel ® Dynamic Platform and Thermal
Framework (Intel® DPTF)" by converting to the thermal_conf.xml format used by
thermald.
Integration with thermald is included so that that a thermald configuration
will be created automatically if thermald is enabled.
This package is not eligible for Fedora as dptfxtract is a non-free executable.
The executable is freely distributable.
Note that I have chosen to enable the extraction by default when installed by
adding an appropriate symlink for thermald.service.wants.
RPM Lint:
dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) thermald -> thermals, thermal,
thermal d
dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thermald -> thermals,
thermal, thermal d
dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone, cons
dptfxtract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml
-> Wrong reports of spelling errors
dptfxtract.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone,
cons
dptfxtract.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml
-> Wrong reports of spelling errors
dptfxtract.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/dptfxtract
-> Upstream binary should not be modified
This is my first rpmfusion package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 5527] New: Review request: wf-recorder - Screen recorder for
wlroots-based compositors eg swaywm
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5527
Bug ID: 5527
Summary: Review request: wf-recorder - Screen recorder for
wlroots-based compositors eg swaywm
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: bob.hepple(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Created attachment 2139
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=2139&action=edit
wf-recorder-0.2-1.src.rpm
I am seeking a sponsor (I am not an existing Fedora sponsored packager or an
RPM Fusion sponsored packager)
spec file: http://bhepple.com/doku/doku.php?id=wf-recorder
SRPM: http://bhepple.com/doku/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=wf-recorder-0.2-1.src.rpm
wf-recorder is a utility program for screen recording of wlroots-based
compositors (more specifically, those that support wlr-screencopy-v1
and xdg-output). Its dependencies are ffmpeg, wayland-client and
wayland-protocols.
It is not eligible in fedora as it has RPMfusion dependencies.
$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/wf-recorder-0.2-1.src.rpm
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wlroots -> roots
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eg -> eh, e, g
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) swaywm -> sway
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wlroots -> roots
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wlr -> war, SLR
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screencopy -> screen
copy, screen-copy, screenplay
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xdg -> bldg
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> MPEG
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep,
reps
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dnf -> def, inf, DNA
wf-recorder.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US noarch -> no arch,
no-arch, monarch
wf-recorder.src: E: description-line-too-long C dnf -y install
https://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-$(rpm -E
31).noarch.rpm
wf-recorder.src:31: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build meson build
--prefix=%{buildroot}/usr --buildtype=release
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings.
Installation instruction line cannot be reformatted.
$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/wf-recorder-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wlroots -> roots
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) eg -> eh, e, g
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) swaywm -> sway
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wlroots -> roots
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wlr -> war, SLR
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screencopy ->
screen copy, screen-copy, screenplay
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xdg -> bldg
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> MPEG
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repo -> rope, rep,
reps
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dnf -> def, inf,
DNA
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US noarch -> no arch,
no-arch, monarch
wf-recorder.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C dnf -y install
https://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-$(rpm -E
31).noarch.rpm
wf-recorder.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/wf-recorder
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings.
Installation instruction line cannot be reformatted.
This is my first RPMfusion contribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 5642] New: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer
FFmpeg-based plug-ins
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5642
Bug ID: 5642
Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer
FFmpeg-based plug-ins
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
SPEC URL:
https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm...
SRPM URL:
https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm...
Description:
GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which
operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything
from real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything
else media-related. Its plugin-based architecture means that new data
types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new
plugins.
This package provides FFmpeg-based GStreamer plug-ins.
FAS login: rathann
Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of
proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. Also,
it depends on FFmpeg, which is in RPM Fusion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years