October 2022 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 6171] New: Review request: kodi-visualization-matrix - Matrix themed visualization plugin for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6171 Bug ID: 6171 Summary: Review request: kodi-visualization-matrix - Matrix themed visualization plugin for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: mike(a)cchtml.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SRPM: https://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/kodi-visualization-matrix-19.0.0-1.f... Spec: https://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/kodi-visualization-matrix.spec Description: This is a "Matrix" themed visualization plugin for Kodi. Depends on Kodi so it is not eligible for Fedora proper. $ rpmlint kodi-visualization-matrix.spec ===================================== rpmlint session starts ===================================== rpmlint: 2.1.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1 ====== 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s ====== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 6383] New: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC image support for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6383 Bug ID: 6383 Summary: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC image support for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: avibrazil(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Easily built using other RPMFusion's kodi spec files as template. Proven to work with vanilla Kodi 19 from RPMFusion (after a simple Kodi restart). This package is essential for iPhone and Mac users that store their photos on Fedora servers and use Kodi to browse and display them. HEIF/HEIC is a new image and photo format much more efficient and flexible than old JPEG. This should build out of the box on newer Kodi/Fedora too with minor obvious tweaks to SPEC file. Please approve and include in RPMFusion for easy installation. Thank you in advance. SPEC: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif SRPM: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif/releases/tag/19.0.0 Output of "rpmlint SRPMS/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm": 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 6187] New: Review request: dcaenc - Dcaenc DTS 5.1 encoder

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6187 Bug ID: 6187 Summary: Review request: dcaenc - Dcaenc DTS 5.1 encoder Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: marik(a)yandex.ru CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: nonfree https://github.com/socketpair/dcaenc-rpm This is an Alsa plugin for encoding sound to DTS 5.1 format. Highly useful for broken HDMI or S/PDIF receivers. I want the package to be included in Fedora Fusion collection since it really helps many guys to get 5.1 sound in MUCH stable way comparing to a52 Alsa plugin. All Rpmlint warnings were fixed. It's my first RPM Fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 1 month

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 6359] New: Haruna - Open source video player built with Qt/QML and libmpv

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6359 Bug ID: 6359 Summary: Haruna - Open source video player built with Qt/QML and libmpv Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zebob.m(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/haruna.spec SRPM: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/haruna-0.8.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Description: Haruna is an open source video player built with Qt/QML and libmpv. FAS: eclipseo Why? It depends on libmpv and ffmpeg. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 2 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 6404] New: Review request: atomes - An atomistic toolbox

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404 Bug ID: 6404 Summary: Review request: atomes - An atomistic toolbox Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: sebastien.leroux(a)ipcms.unistra.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free First of all thanks in advance for the person who will consider this review ;-) URL of spec file: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes-rpm-build/blob/main/atomes.spec URL of source RPM: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes-rpm-build/blob/main/atomes-1.1.0-1.src... Description: Atomes: a toolbox to analyze, to visualize and to edit/create three-dimensional atomistic models. It oﬀers a workspace that allows to have many projects opened simultaneously. The different projects in the workspace can exchange data: analysis results, atomic coordinates ... Atomes also provides an advanced input preparation system for further calculations using well known molecular dynamics codes: Classical MD : DLPOLY and LAMMPS ab-initio MD : CPMD and CP2K QM-MM MD : CPMD and CP2K To prepare the input ﬁlles for these calculations is likely to be the key, and most complicated step towards MD simulations. Atomes offers a user-friendly assistant to help and guide the user step by step to achieve this crucial step. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: The mock build failed because Atomes requires ffmpeg-dev(to build)/ffmpeg(to run) therefore I do not think that it can be included in Fedora rpmlint on the source package: 'rpmlint atomes-1.1.0-1.src.rpm' ======== rpmlint session starts ======== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ======== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s ======== rpmlint on the binary package: 'atomes-1.1.0-1.x86_64.rpm' ======== rpmlint session starts ======== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 atomes.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary atomes atomes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.0 ['1.1.0-1', '1.1.0-1'] ======== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s ======== Warnings: 1) no manual page indeed, is it mandatory ? 2) no idea how to handle the '-1' (or any other for that matter) number at the end and get a match with the version number Finally this is the program's website: https://atomes.ipcms.fr/ The sources are available at: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes It is my first RPM fusion package ! And yes I am seeking a sponsor ! Thank you very much for your consideration ;-) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 2 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 5787] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5787 Bug ID: 5787 Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading HRTFs Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: rpi SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es-1.1.2-4.20201007git3259c93.fc31.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es.spec Summary: OpenGL to GL ES translation library This package is a version for the rpi namespace I expect this package to be useful along with a proprietary driver that lacks libGL implementation (only has gles or egl like rpi). I plan to (automatically) build a rpi agnostic version in a copr repository. (and not on rpmfusion-free or nonfree because it's unknown which gles implementation to target). It's still a question whether this is useful given rpi can use either upstream driver (with upstream kernel) or downstream driver (using kernel-rpi). But if using the raspberrypi-vc userspace, a particular having a libGL would be usefull given it's an assumption by the fedora userspace. I don't plan to exclude the libGL to avoid dependency computation error given that for the rpi namespace Koji scratch build for f33: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 3 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 6367] New: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6367 Bug ID: 6367 Summary: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8. Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hmfhgzwcddhsxjfdzw(a)nthrw.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree The current version in RPMFusion of Nvidia Driver for RHEL8-based system is 510, I just want to make sure if version 515 will be available for RHEL8 in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 6396] New: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface documentation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6396 Bug ID: 6396 Summary: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface documentation Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: fedora(a)sicherha.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree URLs ---- https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix.spec https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix-2017a... Description ----------- A collection of POSIX manual pages from the Linux Documentation Project (LDP). Background ---------- As of August 2022, the POSIX man pages are no longer included in Fedora's `man-pages` package because of licensing concerns. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116859 for more information. rpmlint output -------------- $ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.src.rpm ====================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 ======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s ======= $ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.noarch.rpm ====================================== rpmlint session starts ====================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 man-pages-posix.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs: 100% ======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s ======= Unsurprisingly, this package consists of 100 % documentation, so I feel the 'package-with-huge-docs' warning can be safely ignored. Author information ------------------ This is my first RPM Fusion package; I am not yet a member of the packagers group. I do, however, officially maintain a small number of packages in the Fedora project; namely mold, powerline and python-jenkins-job-builder. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 5 months

1
17
0 / 0

Re: [intel-media-driver] Update to 22.5.4

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

On Sunday, 16 October 2022 at 17:08, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: [...] > Date: Sun Oct 16 16:59:18 2022 +0200 > > Update to 22.5.4 Thanks. I updated intel-mediasdk to 22.5.4 in rawhide as well: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93137169 Simone, would it make sense keep the oneVPL-intel-gpu package in sync with intel-media-driver (RPM Fusion), intel-mediasdk and intel-gmmlib (Fedora) in all branches? Currently, intel-media-driver and intel-mediasdk versions are the following: intel-mediasdk intel-media-driver intel-gmmlib F38: 22.5.4 22.5.4 22.2.1 F37: 22.4.4 22.4.4 22.1.7 F36: 22.3.0 22.3.1 22.1.7 F35: 21.4.3 21.4.3 21.3.5 As you can see, we're only updating to the official releases: https://github.com/Intel-Media-SDK/MediaSDK/releases https://github.com/intel/media-driver/releases not to each tagged version. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

1 year, 5 months

3
5
0 / 0

Final f37 freeze in about one week

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, According to schedule, the f37 is in the 4th of October: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html There is a need to sort out which "feature" we want to have in our GA repository, basically: - Package that need to be removed (Leigh has removed some) - Adapt comps - others ? (please state). On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal (so conflicts with fedora will be restored) and only drop a libavcodec freeworld replacement in an additional dedicated sub-package (with ldconfig override) to complement the fedora counterpart. It means the best of two worlds: - Having our ffmpeg build to be fully autonomous. Do not require small pieces of fedora ffmpeg, and don't wait for counterpart updates, which have been "dramatic" in the past, specially with chromium. - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-free one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build, maintenance). Of course, I persist in the statement from Common_Bugs https://rpmfusion.org/CommonBugs#FFmpeg-free%20conflicts So I don't want to be involved in bugs that would occur in the fedora/original/counterpart/complement packaging myself. But I'm open to review/ease anyone willing to maintain this solution. This also opens the discussion for a mesa-freeworld solution. As I have provided various hints to do so in different places (like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123998 ). Beyond that I hope Fedora 37 will be a good release! -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

1 year, 5 months

3
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2022