[Bug 6383] New: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC
image support for Kodi
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6383
Bug ID: 6383
Summary: Review request: kodi-imagedecoder-heif - HEIF/HEIC
image support for Kodi
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: avibrazil(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Easily built using other RPMFusion's kodi spec files as template. Proven to
work with vanilla Kodi 19 from RPMFusion (after a simple Kodi restart). This
package is essential for iPhone and Mac users that store their photos on Fedora
servers and use Kodi to browse and display them. HEIF/HEIC is a new image and
photo format much more efficient and flexible than old JPEG.
This should build out of the box on newer Kodi/Fedora too with minor obvious
tweaks to SPEC file.
Please approve and include in RPMFusion for easy installation.
Thank you in advance.
SPEC: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif
SRPM: https://github.com/avibrazil/kodi-imagedecoder-heif/releases/tag/19.0.0
Output of "rpmlint SRPMS/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/kodi-imagedecoder-heif-19.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm":
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.1 s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 9 months
[Bug 5787] New: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading
HRTFs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5787
Bug ID: 5787
Summary: Review Request: libmysofa - C functions for reading
HRTFs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Group: Package Reviews
namespace: rpi
SRPM:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es-1.1.2-4.20201007git3259c93.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/gl4es.spec
Summary: OpenGL to GL ES translation library
This package is a version for the rpi namespace
I expect this package to be useful along with a proprietary driver that lacks
libGL implementation (only has gles or egl like rpi).
I plan to (automatically) build a rpi agnostic version in a copr repository.
(and not on rpmfusion-free or nonfree because it's unknown which gles
implementation to target).
It's still a question whether this is useful given rpi can use either upstream
driver (with upstream kernel) or downstream driver (using kernel-rpi). But if
using the raspberrypi-vc userspace, a particular having a libGL would be
usefull given it's an assumption by the fedora userspace.
I don't plan to exclude the libGL to avoid dependency computation error given
that for the rpi namespace
Koji scratch build for f33:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=440257
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 11 months
[Bug 6367] New: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8.
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6367
Bug ID: 6367
Summary: Update Nvidia driver to version 515 for RHEL8.
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: hmfhgzwcddhsxjfdzw(a)nthrw.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
The current version in RPMFusion of Nvidia Driver for RHEL8-based system is
510, I just want to make sure if version 515 will be available for RHEL8 in the
future.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1 year, 11 months
[Bug 6396] New: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface
documentation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6396
Bug ID: 6396
Summary: Review request: man-pages-posix - POSIX interface
documentation
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: fedora(a)sicherha.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
URLs
----
https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix.spec
https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/man-pages-posix/man-pages-posix-2017a...
Description
-----------
A collection of POSIX manual pages from the Linux Documentation Project (LDP).
Background
----------
As of August 2022, the POSIX man pages are no longer included in Fedora's
`man-pages` package because of licensing concerns. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116859 for more information.
rpmlint output
--------------
$ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.src.rpm
====================================== rpmlint session starts
======================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness;
has taken 0.1 s =======
$ rpmlint man-pages-posix-2017a-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
====================================== rpmlint session starts
======================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
man-pages-posix.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs: 100%
======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness;
has taken 0.4 s =======
Unsurprisingly, this package consists of 100 % documentation, so I feel the
'package-with-huge-docs' warning can be safely ignored.
Author information
------------------
This is my first RPM Fusion package; I am not yet a member of the packagers
group.
I do, however, officially maintain a small number of packages in the Fedora
project; namely mold, powerline and python-jenkins-job-builder.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 years
[Bug 6335] New: Review request: jellyfin - The Free Software Media
System
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
Bug ID: 6335
Summary: Review request: jellyfin - The Free Software Media
System
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: mike(a)cchtml.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
SPEC URL: https://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/jellyfin.spec
SRPM URL: https://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/jellyfin-10.8.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
(Note: Due to being 700MB in size I will be removing the SRPM after the
review.)
Description: Jellyfin is a media system based on .NET and has ships a web UI
client by default. There are many other clients that offer interfaces on
numerous devices. It is a fork of Emby, but the code base has changed
significantly since the fork.
Caveats:
- I started with upstream's SPEC so there may be a stray problem. It was almost
re-written.
- Upstream has a modified ffmpeg with non-upstream patches. They are mainly for
hardware acceleration fixes. This package still works against RPMFusion's
ffmpeg. It will take some extra investigation if they are upstreaming their
patches. Upstream may reject users asking for help if they find out they are
using our package without the ffmpeg "upgrades".
- A library shipped by the .NET runtime depends on an older library for F36+.
I've stripped the library until the issue is resolved. Noted in SPEC.
- Since it is a .NET and NodeJS app it requires Internet access to build. I've
put together a script to provide an offline cache of required dependencies.
$ rpmlint jellyfin.spec
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
jellyfin.spec: W: invalid-url Source4: jellyfin-npm.tar.xz
jellyfin.spec: W: invalid-url Source3: jellyfin-nupkgs2.tar.xz
jellyfin.spec: W: invalid-url Source2: jellyfin-nupkgs.tar.xz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.0 s
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 years, 2 months
RPM Fusion update report 2022-08-28
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.154-2.el8
nvidia-settings-390xx-390.154-1.el8
steam-1.0.0.75-1.el8
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.154-1.el8
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
2 years, 3 months
RPM Fusion update report 2022-08-28
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
crystalhd-20220825-1.fc35
Pushed to stable:
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc35
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc35
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
crystalhd-20220825-1.fc36
Pushed to stable:
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc36
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc36
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
crystalhd-20220825-1.fc37
Pushed to stable:
amule-2.3.3-8.fc37
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc37
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc37
vdr-plex-0.4.0-31.fc37
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-19.fc35
nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.154-1.fc35
nvidia-settings-390xx-390.154-1.fc35
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.154-1.fc35
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-21.fc36
nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.154-1.fc36
nvidia-settings-390xx-390.154-1.fc36
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.154-1.fc36
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-22.fc37
nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.154-1.fc37
nvidia-settings-390xx-390.154-1.fc37
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.154-1.fc37
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.154-2.el8
nvidia-settings-390xx-390.154-1.el8
steam-1.0.0.75-1.el8
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.154-1.el8
Pushed to stable:
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
2 years, 3 months
RPM Fusion update report 2022-08-26
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc35
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc35
Pushed to stable:
aegisub-3.3.3-1.fc35
mpd-0.23.9-1.fc35
ppsspp-1.13.1-2.fc35
python-ffmpeg-normalize-1.25.1-1.fc35
stella-6.7-1.fc35
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc36
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc36
Pushed to stable:
aegisub-3.3.3-1.fc36
celluloid-0.24-1.fc36
mpd-0.23.9-1.fc36
ppsspp-1.13.1-2.fc36
python-ffmpeg-normalize-1.25.1-1.fc36
stella-6.7-1.fc36
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
amule-2.3.3-8.fc37
crystalhd-20200825-1.fc37
crystalhd-kmod-20220825-1.fc37
vdr-plex-0.4.0-31.fc37
Pushed to stable:
aegisub-3.3.3-1.fc37
amule-2.3.3-7.fc37
celluloid-0.24-1.fc37
lightspark-0.8.6-1.fc37
mp4tools-3.8-8.fc37
mpd-0.23.9-1.fc37
olive-0.1.2-0.8.20220818gitb169ad9.fc37
ppsspp-1.13.1-2.fc37
python-ffmpeg-normalize-1.25.1-1.fc37
qmplay2-22.08.21-1.fc37
stella-6.7-1.fc37
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
mpd-0.23.9-1.el8
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 35
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 36
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 37
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 9
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.141.03-2.el9
nvidia-settings-470xx-470.141.03-2.el9
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-470.141.03-2.el9
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
2 years, 3 months