February 2023 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 6187] New: Review request: dcaenc - Dcaenc DTS 5.1 encoder

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6187 Bug ID: 6187 Summary: Review request: dcaenc - Dcaenc DTS 5.1 encoder Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: marik(a)yandex.ru CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: nonfree https://github.com/socketpair/dcaenc-rpm This is an Alsa plugin for encoding sound to DTS 5.1 format. Highly useful for broken HDMI or S/PDIF receivers. I want the package to be included in Fedora Fusion collection since it really helps many guys to get 5.1 sound in MUCH stable way comparing to a52 Alsa plugin. All Rpmlint warnings were fixed. It's my first RPM Fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 years

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 6565] New: Review request: kodi-inputstream-rtmp - RTMP inputstream addon for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6565 Bug ID: 6565 Summary: Review request: kodi-inputstream-rtmp - RTMP inputstream addon for Kodi Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/kodi-inputstream-rtmp/pkodi... SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/kodi-inputstream-rtmp/kodi-... Description: This is the RTMP inputstream addon for Kodi. RPM Fusion Account System Username: melmorabity Why not in Fedora: depends on kodi, in RPM Fusion. Notes: this kodi binary addon is required by latest releases of the kodi-pvr-iptvsimple addon for Kodi 20, as well as kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect (see #6387). rpmlint output: $ rpmlint kodi-inputstream-rtmp-20.3.0-1.fc38.src.rpm kodi-inputstream-rtmp-20.3.0-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm kodi-inputstream-rtmp-debuginfo-20.3.0-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm kodi-inputstream-rtmp-debugsource-20.3.0-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 4 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 years, 1 month

1
5
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2023-02-25

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.177-1.fc36 mock-rpmfusion-free-38.0-1.fc36 rfpkg-minimal-0.4.2-2.fc36 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-36-1.fc36 wormsofprey-data-20051221-16.fc36 xmltv-1.2.1-1.fc36 Pushed to stable: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc36 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc36 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc36 Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.177-1.fc37 deadbeef-1.9.5-1.fc37 mesa-freeworld-22.3.6-1.fc37 mock-rpmfusion-free-38.0-1.fc37 rfpkg-minimal-0.4.2-2.fc37 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-37-1.fc37 wormsofprey-data-20051221-16.fc37 xmltv-1.2.1-1.fc37 Pushed to stable: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc37 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc37 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc37 Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.177-1.fc38 deadbeef-1.9.5-1.fc38 mesa-freeworld-23.0.0-1.fc38 mock-rpmfusion-free-38.0-1.fc38 rfpkg-minimal-0.4.2-2.fc38 rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-38-1.fc38 rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-38-1.fc38 wormsofprey-data-20051221-16.fc38 xmltv-1.2.1-1.fc38 Pushed to stable: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc38 gpac-2.2.0-1.fc38 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.22.0-1.fc38 gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.22.0-1.fc38 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc38 libheif-1.15.1-1.fc38 mesa-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-2.fc38 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc38 x264-0.164-4.20220602gitbaee400f.fc38 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: xmltv-1.2.1-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: xmltv-1.2.1-1.el8 Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: xmltv-1.2.1-1.el9 Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-4.fc36 lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts-1.0-4.fc36 Pushed to stable: Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-4.fc37 lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts-1.0-4.fc37 Pushed to stable: Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-4.fc38 lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts-1.0-4.fc38 rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-38-1.fc38 Pushed to stable: fdkaac-1.0.5-1.fc38 zerotier-one-1.10.3-1.fc38 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

xmltv in Fedora? (was: [xmltv] Update to xmltv 1.2.0 release)

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

Is the original reason for this package being in RPM Fusion instead of Fedora even valid? https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34#c0 said: This package cannot be allowed in Fedora since it retrieve information from websites and thus could possibly violate EULA. I'm not entirely sure what the above means and I can't find anything that would forbid packaging website grabbers at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items or https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/ . I'd say youtube-dl or yt-dlp set a precedent here and xmltv could be moved to Fedora proper. What do you think? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

2 years, 1 month

3
2
0 / 0

Several multimedia packages moved to Fedora

by Neal Gompa

Hey all, I've been working on refreshing and migrating packages to Fedora for a while now, and I've completed some already. The following packages have been moved to Fedora 36+ and EPEL 9: * kdenlive * ffmpegthumbs * mlt-freeworld (obsoleted by mlt in Fedora) * xine-lib * libdca * opencore-amr * xvidcore The following packages are in-flight (awaiting package reviews in Fedora): * libopenshot-audio * libopenshot * openshot As more are done, I'll periodically announce them here. Also note, if your packages were only in RPM Fusion because of these being here, consider evaluating to move them to Fedora now. As of Fedora 36 and EPEL 9, we have FFmpeg 5.x in the distribution, which is what opened the doors for packages to move to Fedora proper. Thanks in advance and best regards, Neal -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

2 years, 1 month

3
4
0 / 0

rfpkg mock buildroot init error

by Gary Buhrmaster

I am going to presume that the error during the mock buildroot init: Error: Error downloading packages: Status code: 404 for http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everythi... (IP: 192.168.182.1) while trying to do a rfpkg build on rawhide is not something I am responsible for, and will just need to wait a bit while the various infrastructure buildroot caches get updates. Koji task reference: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=584798

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID d651ff2e: BAD

by Sérgio Basto

Hi, I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38 branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG- KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020 For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] . In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38 unless we change the defaul crypto police (update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY) , I wrote in https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/header-v3-rsa-sha1-signature-key-i... one solution . And I have checked all rpmfusion packages with fc36 have SHA1 when now we need to have SHA256 , ATM I found these 5 packages [3] , which I will rebuild it to be signed again or have you other suggestions ? Best regards, [3] rfpkg-minimal-0.4.2-1.fc36.noarch.rpm rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-35-1.fc36.noarch.rpm wormsofprey-data-20051221-15.fc36.noarch.rpm lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-3.fc36.noarch.rpm lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts-1.0-3.fc36.noarch.rpm [1] Running transaction check error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 1777 Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID d651ff2e: BAD Header SHA256 digest: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK [2] https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2023/01/31/error-rpmdbnextiterator-... https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-... -- Sérgio M. B.

2 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2023-02-19

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc36 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc36 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc36 Pushed to stable: Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc37 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc37 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc37 Pushed to stable: Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: chromium-freeworld-110.0.5481.100-1.fc38 gpac-2.2.0-1.fc38 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.22.0-1.fc38 gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.22.0-1.fc38 jellyfin-10.8.9-2.fc38 libheif-1.15.1-1.fc38 mesa-freeworld-23.0.0~rc4-2.fc38 telegram-desktop-4.6.3-1.fc38 x264-0.164-4.20220602gitbaee400f.fc38 Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: fdkaac-1.0.5-1.fc38 zerotier-one-1.10.3-1.fc38 Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[F38] Issue with i686 on build system

by Luya Tshimbalanga

Hello team, the build system failed to the broken dependencies related to rpm-build with the following line: ``` No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Fri Feb 17 17:33:24 2023. Error: Problem: problem with installed package rpm-build-4.18.0-10.fc38.i686 - package python3-devel-3.11.1-4.fc38.i686 requires (pyproject-rpm-macros if rpm-build), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ``` It seems "pyproject-rpm-macros" is missing for dependency. See https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/4290/584290/mock_output.log from the resulting build https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=584290 Could someone resolve the issue? Thanks.

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2023-02-15

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: rpmfusion-free-release-38-0.2 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 36 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 37 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 38 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-38-0.2 EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 9 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2023