http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
--- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2010-11-25 11:19:06 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
ok ok, you can calm down. If you asked me, I could tell you how my
package got
approved. Its got nothing to even do with this!
I'm only doing this because I wanted to help you out.
Why, why do you say something like this if you wanted someone to review your
package for you?
I am calm :-) And I know you want to help.
I just saw you have been sponsored by Lubomir Rintel during DOSEMU review for
RPM Fusion only. Your sponsor should have verified that you have the required
understanding of Fedora guidelines before sponsoring you.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor
It is your sponsor's duty to help you through the process and verify you have a
good understanding of Fedora (and RPM Fusion) packaging processes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packager_sponsor_responsibilities
But it does seem to me that you don't have the basic understanding of Fedora
packaging guidelines. Therefore I am bound to raise this issue, at least with
your sponsor. I think you have been sponsored too fast without doing any
informal review.
I'm not happy to do this at all and I have nothing personally against you. The
real problem here is that the overall quality of our packages. We (in Fedora or
RPM Fusion) can have good quality packages only if our guidelines are well
understood and followed.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.