[Bug 588] Review Request: rpmfusion-remixes-kickstarts -- Kickstart files for creating distributions or remixes with RPM Fusion packages

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588 Robert Scheck <rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de&gt; 2009-05-10 21:38:46 --- - "URL: http://rpmfusion.org/spin-kickstarts" doesn't exist - s/remixes/remix/ seems to make sense to me because of "spin" not "spins" - You are aware about, that the licensing is not just done by putting a licensing file somewhere? At source code, the code itself e.g. needs to mention the licensing or another file such as readme has to clarify the overall licensing - as far as I got told by spot. Given that this here is only a bunch of configuration files, I'm seeing it relaxed, just as note. - "License: GPLv2+" vs. shipping GPLv3 is legally okay, but is it intended? - Files are put into %{_datadir}/%{name} currently, I assume you already have checked, whether there's maybe a common directory which not including the package name? Or was it intended to use %{name} rather something else? - You might want to explain in a comment how the versioning works as you do not ship a tarball, just a few words (looks like you now depend on spin- kickstarts versioning?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.